Reverse the Tire Ban in California

The House debated a measure calling on California to reverse a new state rule banning most tires that do not meet certain performance standards. Kevin Kiley urged Governor Newsom and the state legislature to end the ban, saying it would force people to buy more expensive tires that wear out faster, raising costs and creating more waste.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Kevin Kiley, CA

Independent

Linked statement

“I want California's leaders to end the state's new ban on most tires. The rule will force people to buy more expensive tires that wear out faster, which costs too much and creates more waste.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, today I am calling on Governor Newsom and the California Legislature to reverse the tire ban. Yes, that is right. In case you didn’t hear, California has banned tires, or at least 70 percent of them that don’t meet performance standards, under a new mandate, the likes of which exists nowhere else in the country. So what does this mean? Californians will now be forced to pay hundreds of dollars more by some estimates. Also, these tires are likely to wear out quicker, which means they are going to have to buy more expensive tires, and they are going to have to buy them more often. By the way, there is going to be more waste with the tires that get used, so it is probably bad for the environment, as well. Mr. Speaker, Californians simply cannot afford this when the cost of living in our State is already higher than anywhere else in the country. When the State tried to ban gas cars without any sort of vote of an elected representative or the voters, we got that reversed through bipartisan legislation here. I am hoping that we can find a way to reverse this, as well. California needs to stop doing things to make life unaffordable and needs to stop banning things without the vote of any elected representative.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 138

  1. House of Representatives Providing for Consideration of H.R. 1501, Protecting Domestic Mining Act of 2025; Providing for Consideration of H.R. 9436, Northeast Lobsterman Protection Act of 2026; Providing for Consideration... 16 statements
  2. House of Representatives Agoa Extension Act 8 statements
  3. House of Representatives In the Matter of Allegations Relating to Representative Chuck Edwards 8 statements
  4. House of Representatives Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Michael Joseph in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply with Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Ethics 6 statements
  5. House of Representatives Resolution Recommending That the House of Representatives Find Hector Roos in Contempt of Congress for Refusal to Comply with Subpoenas Duly Issued by the Committee on Ethics 5 statements
  6. House of Representatives Northeast Lobsterman Protection Act of 2026 23 statements
  7. House of Representatives Providing for the Condemnation and Denouncement of Socialism in All Its Forms, and for Other Purposes 23 statements
  8. House of Representatives Reverse the Tire Ban in California 1 statement
  9. House of Representatives Liberty and Justice for All 19 statements