Ndo Fairness Act of 2025

The House debated H.R. 6048, the NDO Fairness Act of 2025, which changes how the government gets nondisclosure orders that keep people from being told when law enforcement obtains their online communications or records. The bill raises the showing the government must make to a court, limits most secrecy orders to 90 days, and requires the Justice Department to report annually on their use. Representative Fitzgerald, who sponsored the bill, said it adds needed safeguards to the secrecy order process and noted it passed the House nearly unanimously last Congress. Representative Raskin spoke in support as well, saying the bill addresses a flaw in surveillance law by requiring prosecutors to prove they need the secrecy orders. The debate showed support from both parties for the bill.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

3 statements

Scott Fitzgerald, WI

Republican
“I want the House to pass this bill.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6048) to amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed notice requirements, and for other purposes, as amended. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

Scott Fitzgerald, WI

Republican
“I want the House to pass this bill. Right now, the government can secretly look at people's online data by ordering tech companies not to tell them. This bill limits those secrecy orders to 90 days and makes the government prove to a judge why a search must stay secret.”
  • Speech on a bill

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 3 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of my legislation H.R. 6048, the NDO Fairness Act of 2025, and urge its passage. This bill makes much-needed changes to the way law enforcement obtains and utilizes nondisclosure orders, also known as secrecy orders. Before modern advancements in cloud computing, when a law enforcement officer wanted to search someone’s office, they would be required to obtain a search warrant based on probable cause. When the officer executed the search, they would notify the individual, who would then have an opportunity to challenge the search in court. However, the era of cloud computing has ushered in a new method of storing sensitive information, whereby individuals are replacing file cabinets with digital file folders. Unbeknownst to them, by surrendering the physical office in favor of the digital one, individuals are also surrendering their expectation of privacy. That is because a provision within the Electronic Communications Privacy Act allows law enforcement to access an individual’s data by subpoenaing the third-party service provider, such as Microsoft, Google, or Apple, rather than the individual. The law enforcement officer then imposes a secrecy order on the company, preventing them from notifying the individual of the search. The secrecy order is often boilerplate and without a time limit, leading to abuse or overuse. According to Microsoft, between July and December 2024, Federal authorities requested U.S. citizen data from more than 5,500 accounts, an average of 15 requests per day. Over the same period, Google received more than 24,000 subpoenas for nearly 54,000 accounts. In nearly all these cases, a secrecy order was imposed on the company to prevent the disclosure of the search. Look no further than the recent revelations by the House Judiciary Committee that Special Counsel Jack Smith sought and obtained nondisclosure orders to prevent phone carriers from notifying Members of Congress that their phone records were searched. For nearly 2 years, Members of Congress were unable to be notified that their information was searched, all because a Federal judge accepted the government’s boilerplate secrecy order, suggesting disclosure would seriously jeopardize an ongoing investigation. Regardless of your politics, this should alarm every sitting Member of Congress. The NDO Fairness Act of 2025 would stop this abuse, which has allowed the circumvention of the Fourth Amendment protections in favor of convenience. This legislation ends indefinite secrecy orders. Instead, it requires the court to certify that disclosing the search is likely to jeopardize an investigation, result in the destruction of evidence, or endanger the life of an individual. This legislation also imposes a 90-day limit on secrecy orders, with an extension available if, and only if, the need for secrecy is justified based on arguable facts and approval by a judge. Finally, this legislation gives the individual subject to the search a chance to be heard and a chance to request a copy of the information that was disclosed. Today’s legislation, while not a major overhaul of the ECPA, provides us with an opportunity to address the threat to our constitutional freedoms, not just for elected officials, but for all Americans. These changes, I believe, will bring searches of the cloud more closely in line with the Fourth Amendment searches. Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from New York (Mr. Nadler) for co- leading this bill. I also thank the chairman of the committee, Chairman Jordan, for his leadership on the issue. Mr. Speaker, I urge swift passage of this bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Scott Fitzgerald, WI

Republican
“I want the House to pass this bill. It makes it harder for the government to secretly get people's communications data.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I reiterate my strong support for this bipartisan bill, H.R. 6048, which will provide much-needed safeguards on the secrecy order process. This bill passed the House nearly unanimously last Congress, and it is my hope it does so again today. Mr. Speaker, I urge all my colleagues to again vote ``aye’’ on this, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 137

  1. House of Representatives Recognizing Jesi Jetnarayan and Will Davis 4 statements
  2. House of Representatives Hershel "Woody" Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act 6 statements
  3. House of Representatives Ndo Fairness Act of 2025 4 statements
  4. House of Representatives Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act 4 statements
  5. House of Representatives Kayleigh's Law Act of 2026 6 statements
  6. House of Representatives Local Access to Courts Act 4 statements
  7. House of Representatives Protecting American Industry and Labor from International Trade Crimes Act of 2026 6 statements
  8. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Provisions Reclassified to Title 34, United States Code, and to Correct Related Technical Errors 4 statements
  9. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Title 49, United States Code, as Necessary to Improve the Code 3 statements
  10. House of Representatives Amending Chapters 4, 10, and 131 of Title 5, United States Code, as Necessary to Keep Those Chapters Current and to Correct Related Technical Errors 3 statements
  11. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Certain Provisions Classified to Title 2, United States Code, Title 50, United States Code, and Title 52, United States Code, and To... 3 statements
  12. House of Representatives Making Improvements in the Enactment of Title 41, United States Code, into a Positive Law Title and to Improve the Code 3 statements
  13. House of Representatives Making Revisions in Title 51, United States Code, as Necessary to Keep the Title Current, and to Make Technical Amendments to Improve the United States Code 3 statements
  14. House of Representatives Making Improvements in the Enactment of Title 54, United States Code, into a Positive Law Title and to Correct Related Technical Errors 3 statements
  15. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Certain Provisions Which Were Formerly Classified to Chapters 14 and 19 of Title 25, United States Code, and to Correct Related... 2 statements
  16. House of Representatives Moment of Silence Honoring Representative Kay Granger 2 statements
  17. House of Representatives Honoring the Life of Carl Johnson, Sr. 24 statements
  18. House of Representatives Congressional Black Caucus Hit the Ground Running in August 8 statements