Kayleigh's Law Act of 2026

The House debated H.R. 8481, the Kayleigh’s Law Act of 2026, which would require federal courts to issue lifetime no-contact orders against defendants convicted of violent crimes or sex crimes, upon request by the victim or the government, with no fee charged to victims. Supporters, including Republicans Laurel Lee and Abraham Hamadeh and Democrat Jamie Raskin, said victims of serious crimes should not have to keep returning to court to renew protective orders, and noted some states already have similar permanent orders. Hamadeh described the case of Kayleigh Kozak, whose abuse as a child led to repeated contact by her abuser as an adult. Lee closed by thanking groups and members from both parties who worked on the bill and urged passage.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

No matching statements

No statements match this filter

Choose another party or return to all statements.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 137

  1. House of Representatives Recognizing Jesi Jetnarayan and Will Davis 4 statements
  2. House of Representatives Hershel "Woody" Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act 6 statements
  3. House of Representatives Ndo Fairness Act of 2025 4 statements
  4. House of Representatives Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act 4 statements
  5. House of Representatives Kayleigh's Law Act of 2026 6 statements
  6. House of Representatives Local Access to Courts Act 4 statements
  7. House of Representatives Protecting American Industry and Labor from International Trade Crimes Act of 2026 6 statements
  8. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Provisions Reclassified to Title 34, United States Code, and to Correct Related Technical Errors 4 statements
  9. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Title 49, United States Code, as Necessary to Improve the Code 3 statements
  10. House of Representatives Amending Chapters 4, 10, and 131 of Title 5, United States Code, as Necessary to Keep Those Chapters Current and to Correct Related Technical Errors 3 statements
  11. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Certain Provisions Classified to Title 2, United States Code, Title 50, United States Code, and Title 52, United States Code, and To... 3 statements
  12. House of Representatives Making Improvements in the Enactment of Title 41, United States Code, into a Positive Law Title and to Improve the Code 3 statements
  13. House of Representatives Making Revisions in Title 51, United States Code, as Necessary to Keep the Title Current, and to Make Technical Amendments to Improve the United States Code 3 statements
  14. House of Representatives Making Improvements in the Enactment of Title 54, United States Code, into a Positive Law Title and to Correct Related Technical Errors 3 statements
  15. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Certain Provisions Which Were Formerly Classified to Chapters 14 and 19 of Title 25, United States Code, and to Correct Related... 2 statements
  16. House of Representatives Moment of Silence Honoring Representative Kay Granger 2 statements
  17. House of Representatives Honoring the Life of Carl Johnson, Sr. 24 statements
  18. House of Representatives Congressional Black Caucus Hit the Ground Running in August 8 statements