Kayleigh's Law Act of 2026

The House debated H.R. 8481, the Kayleigh’s Law Act of 2026, which would require federal courts to issue lifetime no-contact orders against defendants convicted of violent crimes or sex crimes, upon request by the victim or the government, with no fee charged to victims. Supporters, including Republicans Laurel Lee and Abraham Hamadeh and Democrat Jamie Raskin, said victims of serious crimes should not have to keep returning to court to renew protective orders, and noted some states already have similar permanent orders. Hamadeh described the case of Kayleigh Kozak, whose abuse as a child led to repeated contact by her abuser as an adult. Lee closed by thanking groups and members from both parties who worked on the bill and urged passage.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Jamie Raskin, MD

Democrat
“I support this bill. It requires federal courts to give lifetime no-contact orders to victims of violent crimes and sex crimes if they ask for one. Millions of people suffer from domestic and sexual abuse, and this bill helps protect them.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this bill to strengthen protection for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence. Kayleigh’s Law Act of 2026 would require Federal courts to issue lifetime no-contact orders against defendants who are convicted of certain offenses, including child sexual exploitation, sex trafficking, stalking, and sexual abuse, upon request or consent of a victim but independent of the criminal case. Hundreds of thousands of people live under conditions of sexual violence, intimate partner violence, and other kinds of sexual abuse, and this legislation will help many of them escape that trap and turn their lives around. According to the National Domestic Violence Hotline, an average of 24 people every single minute become victims of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner. That is more than 12 million American women and men every single year. Nationwide, more than one in five women have been raped or subjected to attempted rape, and 60 percent of the rapes are committed by someone they know, a number that increases dramatically for minor victims, going up to 93 percent who actually knew their abuser. The lives of survivors of sexual and domestic violence can be radically altered even long after the abuse has ended, and many suffer from a wide range of chronic physical, mental, and professional problems. They pay a heavy price financially for medical and therapeutic treatment, lost work, and legal expenses. The weight of these burdens is even greater for survivors who have fewer resources and smaller networks to draw upon. In recent years, some States have passed laws to strengthen protections, often thanks to the advocacy of survivors themselves, like Kayleigh Kozak, who was abused by her soccer coach beginning when she was only 12 years old. Because of her undaunted advocacy in her home State of Arizona, survivors of sex crimes and other violent crimes may now petition the court in their State for a permanent order of protection against their abusers, totally separate and apart from the criminal case. Other States have enacted similar laws. I am proud to say that my State, Maryland, is one of them. These laws empower victims and survivors to feel a lot safer and to move forward with their lives. It is wonderful that we are advancing a version of the Kayleigh’s Law Act that will allow Federal courts to issue no-contact orders to victims and survivors of the worst offenses. I am pleased we were able to work together in committee on a bipartisan basis to ensure that this legislation would advance and prioritize the protection and the needs of victims and survivors. Mr. Speaker, I strongly support H.R. 8481. I urge all of my colleagues to do the same, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Jamie Raskin, MD

Democrat
“I want the House to pass this bill. It lets federal courts ban violent criminals and sex offenders from ever contacting their victims again.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Some States have already moved to institute permanent, lifelong no- contact orders, but right now there is nothing at the Federal level that would allow a victim to receive a lifelong, permanent no-contact order, and that is what we are doing. There is no way of undoing a violent act like a rape that has taken place in the life of a victim, but at least we can seal off the victim’s future from further harassment, taunting, leering, insulting, intimidation, and so on from someone who committed the crime. I am proud that we are moving this on a bipartisan basis, and I hope that all of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle will vote ``yes’’ to ensure the protection, the security, and the peace of mind that will result from this legislation. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 137

  1. House of Representatives Recognizing Jesi Jetnarayan and Will Davis 4 statements
  2. House of Representatives Hershel "Woody" Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act 6 statements
  3. House of Representatives Ndo Fairness Act of 2025 4 statements
  4. House of Representatives Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act 4 statements
  5. House of Representatives Kayleigh's Law Act of 2026 6 statements
  6. House of Representatives Local Access to Courts Act 4 statements
  7. House of Representatives Protecting American Industry and Labor from International Trade Crimes Act of 2026 6 statements
  8. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Provisions Reclassified to Title 34, United States Code, and to Correct Related Technical Errors 4 statements
  9. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Title 49, United States Code, as Necessary to Improve the Code 3 statements
  10. House of Representatives Amending Chapters 4, 10, and 131 of Title 5, United States Code, as Necessary to Keep Those Chapters Current and to Correct Related Technical Errors 3 statements
  11. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Certain Provisions Classified to Title 2, United States Code, Title 50, United States Code, and Title 52, United States Code, and To... 3 statements
  12. House of Representatives Making Improvements in the Enactment of Title 41, United States Code, into a Positive Law Title and to Improve the Code 3 statements
  13. House of Representatives Making Revisions in Title 51, United States Code, as Necessary to Keep the Title Current, and to Make Technical Amendments to Improve the United States Code 3 statements
  14. House of Representatives Making Improvements in the Enactment of Title 54, United States Code, into a Positive Law Title and to Correct Related Technical Errors 3 statements
  15. House of Representatives Making Technical Amendments to Update Statutory References to Certain Provisions Which Were Formerly Classified to Chapters 14 and 19 of Title 25, United States Code, and to Correct Related... 2 statements
  16. House of Representatives Moment of Silence Honoring Representative Kay Granger 2 statements
  17. House of Representatives Honoring the Life of Carl Johnson, Sr. 24 statements
  18. House of Representatives Congressional Black Caucus Hit the Ground Running in August 8 statements