Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 811 (Executive Calendar)

Senator Hoeven asked the Senate to pass by unanimous consent a resolution calling for greater action from the Canadian government to combat wildfires whose smoke crosses into the United States, saying the smoke affects millions of Americans and that the two countries should work together. Senator Murray objected, saying the resolution unfairly blames Canada, a partner in fighting fires, and that Congress should instead focus on U.S. wildfire response, including funding the Forest Service and rehiring fired wildfire workers. Hoeven said the resolution is about cooperation and benefits both countries, and Senator Moreno supported it, saying it targets Canada’s leaders rather than its people and that Canada declines to admit American firefighters. Murray’s objection blocks the resolution for now.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Patty Murray, WA

Democrat
“I object to this resolution. It wrongly blames Canada for wildfire smoke instead of working with our neighbors who help us fight fires. We should focus on fixing our own fire problems by funding the Forest Service and rehiring the wildfire workers who were fired.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, reserving the right to object. I am going to ask pretty bluntly, what on earth are my colleagues doing here? I don’t know why Republicans are focused on making a really petty and offensive statement to Canada, saying they need to do a better job of containing wildfire smoke as if the Canadian Government is letting their forest burn and its own citizens inhale wildfire smoke just to spite us. This is a joke. Maybe my colleagues across the aisle don’t realize this, but Canadian firefighters cross that border to help us fight our wildfires right here all the time. And guess what. Our firefighters do the exact same when they are able. In fact, for the information of all Senators, a firefighter actually just passed away who was helping us fight a wildfire in Colorado; he was from British Columbia. Now, what we don’t do is pass resolutions here telling our friends and our neighbors to do a better job of handling wildfire smoke. And also, maybe somebody should alert the President and my colleagues, but wildfire smoke from the United States often makes its way into Canada. It is happening right now where wildfires are burning in Oregon and in Washington. I think what this might be really about is telling Trump that, Mr. President, look how much we agree with you. This is a waste of everybody’s time. So, respectfully, to my colleagues, understanding that time on the Senate floor is precious, here are my suggestions: Maybe we should pass legislation to rehire all of the red card holders that Trump fired. Those are the Forest Service employees who are trained here to help fight wildfires. Or how about we pass legislation to stop the Trump administration’s so-called reorganization of the Forest Service, which would actually shutter offices across our country, including the research labs that helped us study the wildfires and pushed out even more Forest Service employees. Or maybe instead of entertaining Trump’s outrageous requests for a $1.5 trillion war budget, Republicans could work with us to adequately fund our needs here at home. Our Forest Service, right here in the United States, is understaffed and underresourced. Maybe my colleagues don’t realize it, but Trump’s chaotic funding cuts and freezes, along with the chaotic mass layoffs, have actually hurt our public lands and leave us here less prepared to prevent and respond to wildfires here at home. I remember speaking with a Forest Service ranger last year. He was a longtime dedicated employee. He was a former marine. He served our country in more ways than one, and he did an incredible job. He literally saved people’s lives on forest trails, and he fought wildfires here and even saved a small rural town in my State from being burned to the ground. Know what happened to him? Trump and DOGE fired him. No cause, just fired him. That was a huge loss for our State and for our country. So I do want my colleagues to get serious about the wildfires. And I will just say this, the President should actually apologize to our Canadian neighbors for the many threats and insults and, of course, drop those absurd tariffs he is imposing on these wildfires. I am not holding my breath, so enough with gimmicks, Mr. President. You want to work together to prevent wildfires? My door is wide open, and I hope we can all work together to do that. But I will tell you what I am not going to do: insult our Canadian friends to suck up to a President who does nothing but threaten our neighbors. Thank you, Mr. President, I object.

Patty Murray, WA

Democrat
“I object to this resolution. It insults Canada by claiming they are not trying to fight their forest fires. Canada is already working hard to fight fires, just like we are. We should focus on fighting our own fires instead of upsetting our neighbor.”
  • Speech in the House

    Signal 41 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, let me just say to my friend, and he is a friend, and I do hear his quiet, calm tone. I appreciate it. It is not something we all often hear here. But I will say this, in the words that you hear from this resolution, if you are a Canadian, it is that we are insulting them by saying you are not trying to fight your forest fires. And I will tell you this, I am working my tail off to help us fight our wildfires; our Canadian friends are as well. And I think, in this very heightened time--when I know I don’t live far from the border either; we have a lot of trade with our Canadian friends; we go back and forth--they feel very insulted by a lot that is going on. So I think this adds fuel to that fire. So what I say to my friend, let’s work on our country, making sure that we are fighting our forest fires, which I outlined in my response to you, of some of the things we can do, and I believe that our Canadian friends are doing the same. But that is why I object at this time.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 120

  1. House of Representatives National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 36 statements
  2. House of Representatives Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2027 38 statements
  3. House of Representatives Stop Insider Trading Act 25 statements
  4. House of Representatives Directing the President Pursuant to Section 5(C) of the War Powers Resolution to Remove United States Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran 16 statements
  5. House of Representatives America 250 7 statements
  6. House of Representatives Honoring Cassy Dornbusch on Her Retirement 9 statements
  7. House of Representatives Honoring Darlyn Martin 7 statements
  8. Senate Working Families Tax Cut Act (Executive Session) 2 statements
  9. Senate Vote on Flowers Nomination (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  10. Senate Cloture Motion (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  11. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 1804 (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  12. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 811 (Executive Calendar) 6 statements
  13. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--H.R. 1689 (Executive Calendar) 7 statements
  14. Senate Protecting American Taxpayers Act (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  15. Senate Unanimous Consent Request (Executive Calendar) 3 statements
  16. Senate Executive Reports of Committees 2 statements