MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Pat Harrigan

Follow by RSS

Pat Harrigan, a Republican from North Carolina on the Armed Services Committee, concentrates on defense-related legislation and veterans’ issues, often tied directly to his own district and personal history—he cites his time as a Green Beret training at and deploying from Fort Bragg when advocating a veterans’ home there. His specific asks are concrete: convey Fort Bragg land for a veterans’ home, ban automated speed cameras on installations, and fund next-generation geothermal research. He makes his case with stated reasons rather than rhetoric alone—he supports claims with figures (600,000 veterans in North Carolina, 90 gigawatts of potential geothermal capacity) and anticipates objections by spelling out what a bill would not do, such as leaving commanders’ enforcement authority intact. He frequently crosses party lines, cosponsoring with a Democratic colleague and praising a bill as bipartisan, and frames arguments around servicemembers’ interests rather than party messaging. In debate he tends to answer the question asked, offering counterarguments on the merits rather than personal attacks.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
86 / 100 over 5 statements
Signal 79 / 100
Relevance 93 / 100
Respect Not scored yet
Clarity 85 / 100
Averaged over the 5 of 6 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Statements 6

House of Representatives ·

Land Conveyance, Fort Bragg, Harnett County, North Carolina

“I want the House to pass this bill. It gives land to North Carolina to build a home for veterans. The Army supports it, and our veterans deserve this care. I will work to include this plan in our final defense bill.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, one of the benefits of sitting on the House Committee on Armed Services is that we have a lengthy legislative streak of enacting the National Defense Authorization Act. It is a bill that sets the policies for the national security of our Nation. I will provide some assurance to the sponsoring Member that I will work diligently to have this provision incorporated into the conference discussions of the National Defense Authorization Act that I hope will be finalized this Congress. In summary, this is a strong bipartisan bill that is worthy of being enacted. The Army supports this bill, and it is the minimum support that we can provide to support the veterans who have labored so hard for our Nation. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

“I want the House to pass this bill. It gives land at Fort Bragg to North Carolina so the state can build a new nursing home for aging veterans.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, what does it say about our priorities if North Carolina has the land to train our soldiers for war but not the space to care for them when they grow old? That is the problem H.R. 10159 helps solve, and it is why I am proud to cosponsor this bill. North Carolina is home to more than 600,000 veterans, but today the 150-bed Fayetteville State Veterans Home is closed after serious structural problems forced every resident out. The building has closed. The need that it served has not changed. Just a few miles away at Fort Bragg, there are approximately 20 acres that can give that new home a place to be built. I know Fort Bragg well. I trained there as a Green Beret and deployed from there to Afghanistan. The men I served alongside are veterans now. So am I. The 20-year-old soldier eventually becomes the 70-year-old veteran. The country that needed him at 20 still has a responsibility to him at 70. Fort Bragg has spent generations preparing Americans for service. Now, we have an opportunity to use a small part of it to care for them after that service is over. Give North Carolina the land. Let us build the home, and let us take care of the people who spent their lives taking care of our country. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

“I want the House to pass this bill. It lets the Army give land at Fort Bragg to North Carolina to build a home for veterans.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 10159) to authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey to the State of North Carolina a certain parcel of real property located at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on which the State shall construct a veterans’ State home, and for other purposes. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows:

House of Representatives ·

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027

“I want you to support this amendment. Speed cameras on military bases unfairly cost junior troops money. Military police already enforce the speed limits. Also, the computer network these cameras would use is not secure from our enemies.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Chair, I appreciate my colleague from California’s concern about overall base safety. I think if we step back and actually look at the big picture here, what we are talking about is simply a tax on our lower enlisted personnel. We have military police to enforce safety standards that are already issued by the base commanders across every installation that we have. At the end of the day, we cannot deny that NIPRNet has been compromised by over 90 percent of our most serious and significant adversaries--the exact same net that these speed cameras would live on. I think that is a significant concern for the safety and security of our installation personnel and the operations that are ongoing on our installations. For that reason, I encourage my colleagues to strongly support this amendment. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.

“I want the House to pass my amendment to ban automated speed cameras on military bases and remove existing ones. These cameras unfairly take money from our troops. They are also a security risk because foreign enemies could hack them to track our military.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Chairman, I rise today in strong support of my amendment. This amendment does one thing: It bars the Department of War from buying, installing, or operating automated speed cameras on military installations and requires any that are already in place to be decommissioned within 180 days. These systems are not about safety. They are about revenue. They hand out fines without context, without discretion, and without due process for our servicemembers. We just spent the last few years working hard through the NDAA to increase lower enlisted pay, only to seemingly try to take it away from them. Make no mistake, this is not just a financial risk. It is a security risk. We have seen what happens when camera networks tied to critical infrastructure get compromised. Reporting this year revealed that foreign intelligence services spent years secretly accessing Tehran’s traffic camera network to track the movements of Iran’s top leadership ahead of a strike that killed its Supreme Leader. These network systems are an open door for our adversaries to exploit. To be clear about what this amendment does not do, installation commanders still keep the full authority to enforce speed limits through military police, exactly as they do today. Force protection, access control, and criminal investigation cameras at our facility gates will remain untouched. This amendment targets one narrow thing: automated speed enforcement, and nothing else. Our troops should not be a captive customer base for a ticketing vendor or a soft target for our adversaries. This amendment closes that door while preserving every legitimate tool that a commander needs to keep a base safe. Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to support this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.

House of Representatives ·

Next-Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act

“I want Congress to pass this bill to support research into advanced geothermal energy. We need more reliable power for our growing electric grid, but we lack the technology to use heat deep underground. This bill directs the Department of Energy to help solve those technical problems.”
Official Congressional Record

Madam Speaker, when Americans think about energy, they usually think about things that we can see: oil fields, natural gas pipelines, nuclear power plants, wind farms. One of the greatest energy opportunities in our country isn’t aboveground. It is beneath our feet. That is why I am proud to rise in support of my Next-Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act, legislation I am leading with Congresswoman Salinas. America has an extraordinary opportunity to unlock a new source of reliable, around-the-clock power. A single supercritical geothermal well has the potential to produce more than seven times the energy of a conventional geothermal well. Experts estimate next-generation geothermal could ultimately provide up to 90 gigawatts of electricity right here at home. The problem is not that our country lacks the resources, but we lack the technology to fully unlock it. This bill helps close that gap. It directs the Department of Energy to tackle the engineering challenges that still stand in the way of commercialization, expands real-world testing, and strengthens the partnerships between our national labs, universities, and private industry that have always driven American innovation. This is exactly what the government should be doing, not picking winners and losers, but helping solve the kinds of technical challenges the private sector can’t solve alone. Reliable baseload power is no longer a luxury. As AI transforms our economy, manufacturing returns to America, and electricity demand continues to grow, we need to be investing in the technologies that will power the next generation. More reliable American energy means lower costs for hardworking families, a stronger electric grid, and less dependence on foreign adversaries. This bill does exactly that. Madam Speaker, I thank Congresswoman Salinas for her partnership, and I urge all of my colleagues to support the Next-Generation Geothermal Research and Development Act.