Unanimous Consent Request--S. 1804 (Executive Calendar)

Senator Schumer asked the Senate to pass by unanimous consent his bill S. 1804, which he described as barring taxpayer money from being spent upgrading a luxury jet for President Trump, a plane he called unsafe and unnecessary given existing government aircraft. Senator Fischer objected, saying the bill had already been voted down earlier in the year and would prevent the use of foreign-acquired aircraft that she said are needed to protect the president and support nuclear command and control. The request was not agreed to.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Deb Fischer, NE

Republican
“I oppose this bill. It stops us from using planes bought from other countries. We need those planes to protect the president and control our nuclear weapons during a war.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, reserving the right to object, I would like to say a few words about Senator Schumer’s legislation on the Presidential airlift. This has been discussed before, and it was voted down earlier this year as part of a vote-arama that we participated in. Senator Schumer’s legislation would prevent any funding to be used to modify a foreign aircraft for Presidential airlift. We made this point during the vote-arama. The Senator is trying to make a political point today, of course, about the VC-25 Bridge aircraft, which was made in America and then owned by Qatar. Unfortunately, this legislation would also apply to a different aircraft, the Survivable Airborne Operations Center aircraft, or SAOC. Those aircraft were actually purchased from Korean Air. So this legislation would hamper a crucial program that ensures Presidential safety in the event of a nuclear war. Thus, Senator Schumer’s bill would significantly harm our U.S. nuclear deterrents. To be clear, the SAOC is the cornerstone of our NC3 modernization. This is the plane that will command and control our nuclear weapons on America’s worst day. We cannot play these political games with the NC3. So with that, I object.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 120

  1. House of Representatives National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 36 statements
  2. House of Representatives Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2027 38 statements
  3. House of Representatives Stop Insider Trading Act 25 statements
  4. House of Representatives Directing the President Pursuant to Section 5(C) of the War Powers Resolution to Remove United States Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran 16 statements
  5. House of Representatives America 250 7 statements
  6. House of Representatives Honoring Cassy Dornbusch on Her Retirement 9 statements
  7. House of Representatives Honoring Darlyn Martin 7 statements
  8. Senate Working Families Tax Cut Act (Executive Session) 2 statements
  9. Senate Vote on Flowers Nomination (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  10. Senate Cloture Motion (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  11. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 1804 (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  12. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 811 (Executive Calendar) 6 statements
  13. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--H.R. 1689 (Executive Calendar) 7 statements
  14. Senate Protecting American Taxpayers Act (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  15. Senate Unanimous Consent Request (Executive Calendar) 3 statements
  16. Senate Executive Reports of Committees 2 statements