Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act

The House debated the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act (H.R. 6556), which would make it harder for federal regulators to waive the usual cap on how much of the nation’s insured deposits a single institution can control when that institution buys a failing bank. Under the bill, such a waiver could only be granted if the merger is needed to prevent significant economic disruption and if no other qualified bid from a company not subject to the cap exists. Supporters, including the bill’s sponsor Stephen Lynch and Chairman French Hill, said it would create a fairer process so smaller, healthy banks can compete to buy failed banks instead of the largest banks growing bigger, which they said hurts competition and closes local branches. Members also referenced the official cost estimate, and the discussion included examples of recent bank failures and past banking crises.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Stephen F. Lynch, MA

Democrat
“I want the House to pass this bill. It stops giant banks from buying up failing banks when smaller, healthy banks want to buy them instead. Letting giant banks take over failing banks hurts competition, closes local branches, and makes the biggest banks too powerful.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 6556, the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act, which I introduced in December 2025. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill) and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters), our ranking member, who advanced this legislation unanimously within the committee. Specifically, the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act will prevent megabanks from dominating the bidding process for acquiring a failed bank if there are other eligible bids from well-capitalized and well- managed small and midsized banks. In the three decades since 1994, the number of commercial banks has declined in this country by approximately 50 percent, hollowing out the small and midsized institutions that have traditionally housed local community capital. Small to midsized banks are unable to compete with the larger institutions in the failed bank acquisition process, even when attainable opportunities arise which might result in a more favorable result for depositors and impacted businesses and communities. For example, after the collapse of the First Republic Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank in 2023, which were the second, third, and fourth largest bank failures in U.S. history, as part of the resolution process, Federal regulators, including the FDIC, structured an immensely favorable acquisition process to allow JPMorganChase, America’s biggest bank at the time, to acquire the nearly $230 billion in assets and $103 billion in deposits from the failed First Republic Bank. Multiple midsized banks sought to acquire First Republic Bank but failed to compete with J.P. Morgan’s sheer asset holdings, estimated to be close to $4 trillion. As part of that deal, the FDIC also entered into a comprehensive loss sharing agreement with JPMorganChase to incentivize that purchase. In fact, the FDIC agreed to absorb 80 percent of all credit losses. After effectively winning the government auction, J.P. Morgan quickly announced plans to shut down one quarter of First Republic’s 84 branches rather than preserving consumer access to their local branches. The closure also led to the firing of approximately 1,000 bank employees. Acquisitions such as these are now the norm rather than the exception. This year, U.S. bank mergers and acquisitions have hit a 7- year high, up 45 percent since 2024. Consumer advocacy organizations such as Americans for Financial Reform and Better Markets have raised serious concerns about the advantages afforded to large interconnected financial institutions like JPMorganChase in bidding for these failing banks, and as a result growing ever larger while accelerating the process of consolidation. To that end, I introduced this legislation, the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act, which if it were law at the time would have created a more level playing field between healthy medium-sized as well as larger banks to both stabilize markets but also to better serve depositors, businesses, and the impacted communities in which those banks are located while avoiding megabanks gobbling up smaller banks in the steady march toward consolidation. Megabanks should not be allowed to take advantage of financial crises to increase their domination and pad their own profits. This legislation would take an important step toward increasing competition and improving the resilience of our financial system from economic shocks. I am proud that this bill was passed unanimously in committee by every Democrat, every Republican, and has the support of Americans for Financial Reform to boot. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Stephen F. Lynch, MA

Democrat
“I want the House to pass this bill. It stops giant banks from buying failing banks when smaller banks want to buy them instead.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Let me first of all thank Chairman Hill for his kind remarks and his astute observations on the circumstances that have brought us to this point. I will add that I believe this morning it was announced that JPMorganChase, which was the benefactor of this previous transaction, is now approaching $5 trillion in assets. That is indeed remarkable. Their market cap is about a trillion dollars, as well. I think this legislation does point to that loophole that allows megabanks to acquire failing banks even when other eligible, well- managed small and midsize banks have submitted competing bids improving community and regional bank competitiveness and preventing further consolidation among our largest financial institutions. Again, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 114

  1. House of Representatives Celebrating 70th Anniversary of Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 2 statements
  2. House of Representatives Supporting Ukraine 3 statements
  3. House of Representatives Congratulating Pella High School Marching Dutch 3 statements
  4. House of Representatives Honoring Beatrice Lumpkin 3 statements
  5. House of Representatives Honoring Clara Martin 4 statements
  6. House of Representatives Recognizing Charlotte King 2 statements
  7. House of Representatives Congratulating Tanque Verde High School Softball Team 3 statements
  8. House of Representatives Honoring Jim Walden 3 statements
  9. House of Representatives Honoring the Front Royal Rotary Club 4 statements
  10. House of Representatives Recognizing William "Buddy" Bennett 3 statements
  11. House of Representatives Recognizing Door County Sheriff Deputies 4 statements
  12. House of Representatives Congratulating Tony Brads 5 statements
  13. House of Representatives Providing for Consideration of (H.R. 139) Sunshine Protection Act of 2025; Providing for Consideration of (H.R. 8595) National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act... 20 statements
  14. House of Representatives Common Cents Act 10 statements
  15. House of Representatives Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act 6 statements
  16. House of Representatives Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act 14 statements
  17. House of Representatives Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 17 statements
  18. Senate Remembering Lindsey Graham (Executive Session) 2 statements
  19. Senate National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027--Motion to Proceed 9 statements