MERIT Act (Executive Session)

A Senate debate on the MERIT Act, which would require anyone serving as Director of National Intelligence, including in an acting capacity, to have substantial national security experience. Senator Slotkin, a Democrat, supported the bill, saying the position holds significant power and that a leader without relevant experience could misuse it against the American people. Other statements from the sampled discussion are not available.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Elissa Slotkin, MI

Democrat

Linked statement

“I want Congress to pass this bill. It requires anyone who leads our national intelligence agencies to have strong national security experience. This leader has a lot of power, and an unqualified person could abuse that power against the American people.”
  • Speech in the House

    Signal 44 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, I rise today to discuss the MERIT Act, the Minimum Experience Requirements for Intelligence Transition Act--a lot of words, but the bill is simple. It requires anyone serving as the Director of National Intelligence--even in a temporary capacity--to have extensive national security experience. It is common sense. You don’t hand the keys to America’s intelligence community to someone who has no experience, regardless of party or political loyalty. The Director of National Intelligence is a powerful job, and I know because I was there at the creation. I was one of the first people at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, when it was stood up. I was seconded there as a CIA officer. I helped stand it up after Congress created it so that we never again miss a terrorist attack, like we did on 9/11. The Office uses powerful tools to gather secrets from our foreign adversaries, like China and Russia, from terrorist networks, and from threats to our homeland. But it is that power in the wrong hands that I want to talk about today. America’s national intelligence community can be used to gather information not just from our foreign adversaries but, if turned against us, against the American people, it can be used to monitor Americans, to target political opponents, to dig through records, to punish critics, to help any President relitigate an election. Right now, that is where we are.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 116

  1. House of Representatives Take Care of America's Veterans Act 26 statements
  2. Senate Remembering Lindsey Graham (Executive Session) 2 statements
  3. Senate Cloture Motion (Executive Session) 2 statements
  4. Senate Legislative Session 5 statements
  5. Senate Providing for Congressional Disapproval Under Chapter 8 of Title 5, United States Code, of the Rule Submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human... 7 statements
  6. Senate MERIT Act (Executive Session) 1 statement
  7. Senate Statements on Introduced Bills and Joint Resolutions 2 statements