MEMBER OF CONGRESS

John W. Hickenlooper

Follow by RSS

Hickenlooper, a Colorado Democrat, returns most often to his home state’s wildfires and firefighting community, pushing specific asks such as an Interior Department investigation into the deaths of four wildland firefighters, and to oversight of the administration’s war in Iran and Justice Department nominations. He frequently cites figures and personal Colorado detail to build a case, but he often draws strong conclusions from thin reasoning—a single self-correction at a hearing becomes proof a nominee will not be impartial, and disagreement between the President and the nominee is taken as evidence not to believe him—and he makes open-ended commitments like promising to ‘do everything we can’ or to work on ‘commonsense solutions’ without naming who will act, by when, or how. He opposes the administration squarely and speaks of it in sharp terms, while working across the aisle on narrower bills such as the Down syndrome research act, and he mostly sticks to Democratic messaging with home-state framing.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B–
72 / 100 over 5 statements
Signal 80 / 100
Relevance 50 / 100
Reasoning 80 / 100
Respect Not scored yet
Clarity 89 / 100
Averaged over the 5 of 6 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it.2.9 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.9

Statements 6

Senate ·

Protect College Sports Act of 2026

“I want the Senate to vote this week to end the war in Iran. The war has cost over $43 billion, killed at least 19 American troops, and hurt hundreds more. It is draining our military supplies and driving up the cost of gas, food, and mortgages for everyday Americans. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, not the president. We need to vote to stop this war.”
  • Speech on a bill

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this speech addressed the bill under debate and what it would change.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, $43.6 billion and counting--that is the Pentagon’s estimate for how much it has spent on this illegal war in Iran. Now, that is a lot of money. In fact, it is so much money that if every American family gave $500, you still wouldn’t have enough to pay for this war--the missiles, the munitions, the warships. Over $43 billion of taxpayer money with no discernible benefit--wasted. But I don’t want to talk about what $43 billion includes. Today, I want to talk about what that number doesn’t include. Wars aren’t measured just in dollars and cents; they are measured in lives lost, whether Americans feel safer at home, better off. And by all these accounts, the costs are enormous. Take the 19 brave servicemembers whose deaths have been disclosed by the Pentagon. That is 19 families who have lost someone irreplaceable. In just a few weeks, children are going to trick-or-treat without their parent. A few weeks later, parents and families will gather for Thanksgiving with an empty seat at the table. ``I will never recover from this,’’ one widow wrote on social media. What is even more heartbreaking is that we don’t know exactly how many servicemembers have died in the Middle East amid this war. Reports say that the Pentagon is not being transparent with Congress or the American people. What we know is that every one of those lives lost deserves our gratitude, and every one of those families deserves an accurate accounting of this war’s human cost. Since February, more than 800 servicemembers have been wounded in the Middle East. Some went days without receiving adequate hospital care. Many face life-altering injuries. Tens of thousands of their fellow servicemembers are still deployed, fighting a war that this administration still refuses to call a war. Back at home, their loved ones are left worrying and wondering whether their loved ones will get home for the holidays. You are not going to find any of those costs in the $43 billion pricetag. There has also been a staggering cost in America’s loss to national security. Since June, the war has consumed between one-half and two- thirds of our key missile defense interceptors. Even with increased production rates, it will take at least 5 years to rebuild those stockpiles. Every interceptor we fire in Iran is one that we don’t have protecting this country in the future. Iranian strikes have damaged or destroyed hundreds of buildings and structures on U.S. bases, along with our relationships with the allies and partners who agreed to host them as a bulwark against the aggressions of Iran. That premise has been turned on its head. At the same time, we have shown Iran that it can seize control of one of the world’s most critical waterways and literally bring global trade to a stop, bring it to its knees. A quarter of the world’s oil and a third of the world’s fertilizer trade used to flow through the Strait of Hormuz. No longer. We have given our adversaries a roadmap and even a test drive for holding the global economy hostage, which the Houthis have already exploited in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. America’s adversaries are celebrating our distraction, this futility, and the mounting costs. Every dollar we spend on Iran is a dollar we are not spending modernizing our military to protect against the threat of an ascendant China. Every warship that is deployed to the Arabian Sea is one fewer warship that is available to protect the South China Sea. But you are not going to find those costs in the $43 billion pricetag either. And then there is the cost, well, to you, the American people. You are paying for this war every day when you fill up your tank, when you buy groceries, when you pay your rent. Before the war, the national average for diesel was $3.72 per gallon. This week, it is over $6.50 per gallon for diesel. That is nearly a 75-percent increase. That means that a small farmer using 1,000 gallons of diesel during a harvest is paying roughly $2,800 more just to do the same work as before the war. Even Republicans have said it: This is ``killing farmers’ income’’-- that that is what this war is doing: ``killing farmers’ income.’’ The war is also impacting Americans’ grocery bills. Between July of 2025 and July of 2026, fresh vegetable prices increased over 6 percent, beef rose over 9 percent, and tomatoes are up over 13 percent. You shouldn’t have to be a millionaire to drive to the grocery store and feed your family. Few have felt the financial cost of this war more than prospective home buyers. Before the Iran war, the average 30-year mortgage rate was hovering right around 6 percent--still too high for many families. Today, it is above 7 percent. For the average Colorado home buyer, that difference adds up fast. That is a mortgage that is $280 more every month, almost $4,000 a year, and over $100,000 over the course of a 30- year mortgage. That is real money that could go to childcare, to a child’s college savings, or just their lifetime savings. For many, it means buying a home just doesn’t make financial sense right now, even if you have been saving up for years. You won’t see those tradeoffs reflected in the Pentagon’s $43 billion pricetag for this war. Let me ask, finally, what is the cost of this war on our democracy? James Madison once wrote to his friend Thomas Jefferson that ``the Executive is the branch of power most interested in war, and most prone to it.’’ That is why the Founders gave Congress the power to declare war--not the President, not the Supreme Court; Congress. Yet, so far, not a single Senator has introduced a legislative measure to formally declare war on Iran. The Presiding Officer may have noticed that up until now, I haven’t mentioned President Trump. That is not because the President bears no responsibility for this war. He certainly does. President Trump unilaterally made the decision to enter this costly--for most people, unwarranted--war. But the decision about whether it continues does rest with Congress. To my colleagues, Republicans and Democrats, who are wrestling with this issue, just ask yourself, is this war making the lives of your constituents any better? That isn’t a partisan question; it is a question every Senator has an obligation to ask and a responsibility to get the response for. Because whether the President is a Republican or a Democrat, Congress cannot surrender its constitutional power simply because the President belongs to our party. We all, each and every Senator--we all took an oath to defend the Constitution, not a President. We all took an oath to serve the American people, not a party. President Trump made the decision to enter this war, but whether this war continues is now a decision for all of us. What is the true cost of this war and the cost of allowing it to continue? Well, this week, the Senate is going to get another chance to decide. I urge, as I have been--I urge all of my colleagues to join me in voting to end this war now and for good. I yield the floor.

Senate ·

Deondra Dixon Include Project Act of 2026

“I want to recognize the groups working on Down syndrome research, care, and advocacy. These include the Global Down Syndrome Foundation, the Linda Crnic Institute, the Alzheimer's and Cognition Center, and the Sie Center at Children's Hospital Colorado.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, I also would be remiss if I didn’t recognize, once again, the incredible partners that have been behind these Down syndrome advocacy, research, and medical care--primarily the Global Down Syndrome Foundation, but also the Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, the Alzheimer’s and Cognition Center, and the Sie Center at Children’s Hospital Colorado. I yield the floor.

“I want the Senate to pass this bill. It makes a government research project for Down syndrome into official law. People with Down syndrome need more research to find new treatments.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent for the Senate to pass S. 1838, the DeOndra Dixon INCLUDE Project Act. Thousands of Americans live with Down syndrome, and yet research has been underfunded for decades. In 2017, Congress encouraged the National Institutes of Health, the NIH, to launch the INCLUDE Project--an effort to make groundbreaking discoveries about conditions that disproportionately affect people with Down syndrome, like Alzheimer’s disease. The INCLUDE Project brings together multiple NIH institutes under a coordinated approach that is already delivering significant scientific discoveries as well as new treatments. The bipartisan, bicameral DeOndra Dixon INCLUDE Project Act will officially authorize the INCLUDE Project into law. The bill will ensure that Congress and the American people have visibility into the scientific breakthroughs that are so needed for this community. The INCLUDE Project is already yielding significant scientific results, and Colorado is at the core of these scientific advances. Today, Colorado is proudly home to the world’s leading Down syndrome advocacy, research, and medical care partners at the Global Down Syndrome Foundation, the Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, the Alzheimer’s and Cognition Center, and the Sie Center at Children’s Hospital Colorado. We need to make sure that improving health outcomes for individuals with Down syndrome remains a priority and do so in honor of DeOndra Dixon, an extraordinary person who was an advocate leaving a legacy that will help improve lives for generations. This bill has support on both sides of the aisle, including Senators Jerry Moran and Cory Booker and Representatives Diana DeGette and Richard Hudson. We also thank Senators Bennet, Padilla, Capito, Coons, Van Hollen, and Ossoff for their support. We are determined to get this bill across the finish line for DeOndra and for the thousands of Americans who will see their lives improve for the better by this critical research. Mr. President, as if in legislative session and notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions be discharged and the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of S. 1838.

Senate ·

Nomination of Todd Blanche (Executive Session)

“I oppose confirming Todd Blanche as Attorney General, and I want other senators to vote against him too. He is loyal to President Trump instead of the law. I do not trust his promises to stop a fund that could pay people who attacked the Capitol. He also wants to ban abortion everywhere and will target states like mine.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, the Senate is currently considering the nomination of Todd Blanche to serve as Attorney General of the United States. The Attorney General is one of the most important positions in the U.S. Government. Not only does the Attorney General serve as a trusted member of the President’s Cabinet, but he also leads the Department of Justice, the Agency responsible for enforcing the laws of the land and, hopefully-- traditionally--enforcing them in a nonpartisan way. That is a difficult job in any administration, but under this President, who values personal loyalty above pretty much all else, it may well be impossible. During his confirmation hearing, Mr. Blanche was asked about his relationship with the President. He responded, ``I’m his lawyer,’’ before quickly correcting himself to say that he previously ``was’’ his lawyer. Now, this wasn’t a slip; this was a tell. Mr. Blanche will not be an impartial check on the President. And here is another tell: For months, Mr. Blanche has insisted the Department of Justice slush fund is dead. Yet, as recently as this weekend, President Trump was saying the exact opposite. He defended the fund. So when Mr. Blanche says the slush fund is dead, the slush fund isn’t moving forward, don’t believe him, not for 1 second. His word is worth about as much as the Trump meme coin. During reconciliation, we introduced an amendment to permanently-- permanently--end the DOJ slush fund. Despite bipartisan support, it ultimately was voted down. That means taxpayers could still be on the hook for paying bounties, rewards to people who attacked our democracy, attacked this Capitol. At a time when working families are struggling with rising costs, the last people the Federal Government should seek to reward, to subsidize are those who assault our elections, people like convicted election criminal Tina Peters, who tried to undermine Colorado’s free and fair elections; people like the January 6 rioters--my first full day of work in this position--the rioters who stormed this very Chamber in an attempt to tear apart our democracy. The DOJ slush fund isn’t dead; it is dormant. Until Congress permanently closes this avenue through legislation, we shouldn’t rely on assurances alone. If there is even a chance that this fund could be revived, this confirmation, this moment, is when this Chamber and its Members have the greatest leverage to act. We should not surrender that leverage for promises that can be undone at the President’s whim. A DOJ letter promising to end the slush fund isn’t law, it isn’t binding, and it is certainly not enough. Now, to be clear, we don’t believe Mr. Blanche will break all of his promises. When he says behind closed doors that he wants the Dobbs v. Jackson decision to become, in his words, ``permanent in every state,’’ we should believe him. When someone reveals themselves to you, it is generally a good idea to believe them. Whether it is abortion access or access to the ballot box, we should have little confidence that this new Attorney General will not target Colorado or other blue States because that is exactly what his boss wants. We cannot allow a fox to guard the henhouse. We need an Attorney General who is loyal to the Constitution, not to President Trump. Mr. Blanche does not seem to be that person. Mr. Blanche is not that person. I strongly, strongly oppose his confirmation and urge all of my colleagues to do the same. I yield the floor.

Senate ·

Colorado Wildfires (Executive Session)

“Drought and wildfires will keep getting worse and more expensive unless we take action. I want Congress to work together on solutions to make our communities safer.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, block after block, all that remained was heavy smoke and heartbreak, charred chimneys, and maybe a hearth here and there. Drought and wildfires aren’t going away. Unless we act, they will only become more frequent, more destructive, and more expensive. That is why we need to work together on commonsense solutions to make everything we do safer. That is why we are fighting here. That is what we are fighting for here in Washington, and I hope my colleagues will join me in this effort. I yield the floor.

“Four firefighters died in a Colorado wildfire, and I want the Department of the Interior to investigate what went wrong. Colorado has far more fires now because of bad drought and climate change. The Senate should pass my bill to manage our forests better and stop fires from spreading. The Trump administration has wrongly held back money for our water projects and denied disaster aid to our communities because of politics. Congress should pass my bill to review those decisions and keep disaster help fair.”
  • Speech in the House

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 9 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, June 27 was one of the worst days in recent Colorado history. As the Knowles fire rolled along the Colorado- Utah border, the Rifle Helitack team put on their uniforms and rushed toward danger. While battling the blaze, one firefighter was badly injured and four others--Nick Hutcherson, Emily Barker, Sydney Watson, and Nathan Matthews--ultimately lost their lives. There is bravery--and then there is wildland firefighting. The word ``hero’’ gets used a lot. Nick, Emily, Sydney, and Nathan embodied that word. They came from across the country to Colorado to form a unit united by one common mission: protecting lives, protecting property, and the landscapes we all cherish. Their commitment to our public lands wasn’t a hobby; it was their life’s work. Together, they collectively spent decades fighting fires. And as dedicated as they were to their vocation, they were equally devoted to their friends and to their families, making this loss even more devastating. Our hearts break for these firefighters and their families and all who loved them. These families deserve answers, and we need to understand what went wrong so we can prevent future tragedies. That is why I am calling on the Department of the Interior to conduct a swift and thorough investigation into what happened, including whether the administration’s recent shift to the Wildland Fire Service played any role in this event. This isn’t about playing politics or gotcha, trying to find blame. With wildfires still raging across Colorado, we can’t afford to wait months and months to learn lessons that could save lives right now. Colorado’s firefighting community is close-knit. They are almost like an athletic team. The loss of one firefighter is felt by everyone. The loss of four is quite simply unimaginable. So we have to get to the bottom of what happened and do everything we can to make sure that we prevent a repeat tragedy. As we do that, we are also mourning the loss of Nicholas Dale of British Columbia. Nicholas was a helicopter pilot who was tragically killed while battling a fire near Ouray in southwest Colorado. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family as well. Last month, I traveled to the Snyder fire command post, and there I met with some of Nick, Emily, Sydney, and Nate’s fellow firefighters and heard some of their stories. It brought me back to my time as Governor, standing with crews after a terrible tragedy. The heartbreak never gets easier; it only gets worse over time. And Colorado’s wildfires keep getting worse too. In the 1990s, Colorado averaged 13 wildfires a year. By the 2020s, that number has climbed from 13 to 70 a year. And that is why I am here today--because we have a responsibility, all of us, regardless of politics, to prevent wildfires, to protect our communities, and to help people recover from disasters. We know we are not going to stop every wildfire, but we also know that many of the worst wildfires could have been less destructive if we had taken certain commonsense steps sooner, both from a shorter and a longer term perspective. First, we need to treat climate change like the emergency it is, and that is a long-term horizon but an important one. On a visit outside of Leadville earlier this year, one individual told our office that the annual snowpack averaged 240 inches. That is 20 feet. The thinnest snowpack in that equal period, that last 100 years--and, again, these are data collected every March for 100 years--the smallest, thinnest snowpack was 182 inches--not 240, which was the average--but 182 inches, roughly 15 feet. Two-hundred forty inches is 20 feet. This winter, it was about 60 inches. That is 5 feet. So the average was 20 feet, the alltime low in 100 years was 15 feet, and suddenly this year it is 5 feet. And this isn’t an isolated incident. Colorado is facing its worst drought in 1,200 years, according to sediments from the Grand Canyon. Let me say that again because it is hard to believe. Colorado is facing its worst drought in 1,200 years. That means you have to go back to the 9th century to find drought conditions this bad in Colorado. Lake Mead and Lake Powell, two of our biggest reservoirs in the West, have now fallen to their lowest levels on record. If the water in Lake Powell falls just another 33 feet, we will hit what they call the power pool, meaning that point where there won’t be enough water to generate hydroelectric power. Not every wildfire is caused by climate change, but scientists widely agree that climate change is making the problem far worse. Heat, drought, a moisture-starved atmosphere all increase wildfire risk, and each of these factors can be connected back to climate change. Since joining the Senate, tackling wildfires and drought has been among my top priorities. That is why we passed the Inflation Reduction Act, which included the largest climate investment in American history. We won $4 billion for the Colorado River Basin and $8 billion for western water infrastructure. We have brought Senators from seven States together to form the Colorado River Caucus, a bipartisan caucus, to build consensus on how to use our shared resources, and we have introduced legislation that would help manage our forests better as well. Overgrown woodlands are tinderboxes that let wildfires spread faster and farther, but too often government bureaucracy blocks the projects that we most need in order to reduce that risk before disaster strikes. Together with Senators Alex Padilla, John Curtis, and Tim Sheehy, we introduced the bipartisan Fix Our Forests Act. The idea is simple: streamline forest management and speed up new technologies for wildfire prevention, detection, and response. Our bill has passed through committee, and it is waiting for a full vote on the Senate floor. It shouldn’t take another tragedy for the Senate to act. We need to pass Fix Our Forests now. Solving our drought and our wildfire challenges requires cooperation across every level of government, but recently, that cooperation has been strained. Last year, the Trump administration froze over $150 million in already-obligated funding for 17 Colorado water and drought resiliency projects. At a time of unprecedented drought, that is quite simply unconscionable. We refused to accept it, and we pushed the administration to release that money. So far, we have gotten roughly two-thirds of the funds released. We will not stop pushing until Colorado communities get every dollar they are entitled to. Colorado is also home to one of the world’s great scientific resources, the National Center for Atmosphere Research, which is in Boulder, CO. For years, NCAR has given weather, climate, and wildfire forecasts that firefighters and emergency managers rely on to fight disasters. And we are going to keep fighting for NCAR and for science. And, finally, solving our wildfire problem and responding to disasters requires all of us to work together. So I want to, for a moment, just speak directly to our President. Last summer, one of the largest wildfires in Colorado history tore through Rio Blanco County. President Trump should know this county well. Can’t expect him to know every county, but this is a special county. They love him. They voted overwhelmingly to support him in 2024, but there are now a lot less campaign signs there than there were in 2024. When Colorado filed a disaster declaration to help these same people rebuild and prevent future tragedies, the White House denied their request. These are people who did everything right their entire lives, only to lose it all in a natural disaster. They paid their taxes, believing that if the worst ever did happen, their government would be there for them. I think President Trump broke that promise. Disasters should never be political, but this administration has politicized it. And if you are a Republican living in a blue State, you had better hope that disaster doesn’t strike your community or, if you live in a red State and our next President happens to be a Democrat, you better hope this new Democratic President doesn’t stick to these new rules created by President Trump. The President has approved 80 percent of disaster requests from Republican Governors but only about 60 percent from Democratic Governors. That is not normal. To my knowledge, that has never happened before at that scale. Under prior administrations, the approval rate was roughly the same no matter which way a State had voted. And that is the way it should be. That is the way it has to be in a democracy. Politics should never decide whether you can rebuild your house after a fire. The Aspen Acres fire in south-central Colorado has already destroyed over 300 houses. Colorado is slowly getting that fire under control, thanks to the brave firefighters who are working day and night, addressing it. It is the seventh-largest wildfire in State history, and we are grateful FEMA has authorized fire management assistance grants for that fire, as well as for the Gold Mountain fire and the Willow fire. The Aspen Acres fire will likely require a major disaster declaration. If it does, we will push this administration with everything we have to make sure Colorado gets the resources it needs and deserves. We are also fighting to take politics out of disaster relief. Congress needs to pass our bipartisan Disaster Declaration Transparency Act. It gives Congress the power to review disaster relief denials driven--or at least apparently driven--by politics because disaster relief should never be political. In the meantime, it is important that every single Coloradan do their part to help reduce wildfire risks. They have got to follow local restrictions, practice campfire safety, and create defensible space around their property. On a recent trip to Beulah--which was engulfed by the Aspen Acres fire--I saw firsthand the devastation that wildfires leave behind.