MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Brett Guthrie

Follow by RSS

Guthrie, a Republican on the Energy and Commerce Committee, spends most of his floor time managing consideration of largely bipartisan bills on health (ALS, breast cancer screening, traumatic brain injury, fentanyl and xylazine) and energy (grid capacity, battery recycling, critical minerals), typically urging a yes vote. His speech is heavily procedural—the signature phrase ‘I yield myself such time as I may consume’ opens nearly every statement, and closing remarks often consist mainly of thanking bill sponsors and yielding time, so much of his airtime goes to floor mechanics rather than argument, far more than most members. When he does argue, he is concrete and mostly free of invective: he cites figures (DERA’s $2.30 in outside funding per federal dollar, 47 million seized fentanyl pills), names bill sponsors across both parties, stresses competition with China on technology and minerals, and frequently ties bills back to Kentucky, as with bluegrass music’s origins in ‘my district.’ His main recurring weak spot is staying on the question: much of his speaking time answers something other than the issue under discussion, usually procedure or thanks, and he occasionally asserts conclusions like California’s emission waiver lacking ‘meaningful, measurable decrease in emissions’ with little supporting detail.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B+
81 / 100 over 41 statements
Signal 63 / 100
Relevance 97 / 100
Respect Not scored yet
Clarity 95 / 100
Loses points more than most for Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.1.8 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.8 Loses points less than most for Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 41 of 81 statements graded so far.

Statements 81

House of Representatives ·

Sunshine Protection Act of 2025

“I support this bill to make daylight saving time permanent. People want more daylight in the winter, and they are tired of changing their clocks twice a year. States can still choose to stay on standard time if they prefer.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate my friend from Florida yielding. It is fun today because I have my friend from Florida controlling time. I have another friend from Florida (Mr. Soto) speaking for the bill, and we have the sponsor from Florida. I will say also to the American people, Mr. Speaker, through you, that a very famous resident of Florida mentioned this to me in the Oval Office a few weeks ago, so I know there is strong support. It is actually called the Sunshine Protection Act, and the reason is people like the longer daylight hours. They like daylight even in the wintertime. I live on the very eastern end of central time. My district is split almost down the middle. I represent people who are on the very western end of eastern time, and I live on the very eastern end of central time. It does get dark at approximately 4:30 in the afternoon where I live. People want more time, and they want more daylight. The thing is that they just don’t want to have to change their clocks. As my friend from New Jersey talked about, in 1974, we did vote to change. It was because of the energy crisis going on when I was a kid. They changed it in the middle of winter. It created all kinds of disturbance. What we have done with this bill is let people know ahead of time, you are not going to have to change your clock. We have General Assemblies that can lock in which time they want. We all know that Arizona and Hawaii stay on standard time. They will stay on standard time if their General Assembly so chooses. Any other State has the opportunity, whether they are in session or not. There is always a provision. I know in Kentucky they are not in session, but there is a provision that if Kentucky wants to stay on standard time, the Governor can call them into session and do so. I don’t think they are going to do that. We have given States flexibility, but we have given our country consistency. I really appreciate the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Buchanan) for working hard on this bill. I believe it is the right time to do it, so I encourage my colleagues to support H.R. 139, the Sunshine Protection Act, and I believe it will be good for the American people.