Stop Insider Trading Act

The Senate debated a motion to proceed to the Stop Insider Trading Act, a bill aimed at restricting stock trading by members of Congress. Senator Klobuchar said she supports banning congressional stock ownership and trading but voted against the motion to proceed because, in her view, the bill would still allow members to own and trade stocks and also contains voting-related provisions she opposed, including ones she described as making vote-by-mail harder.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Amy Klobuchar, MN

Democrat
“I voted against this bill. I want to ban members of Congress from owning or trading stocks, but this bill still lets them do that. It also includes harmful rules that would make it harder for people to vote by mail.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, I rise to discuss my vote on rollcall vote No. 253, the motion to proceed to the Stop Insider Trading Act. I strongly support efforts to remove potential conflicts of interest, promote strengthened ethical standards, and restore public trust in government. That is why I voted for commonsense legislation--the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act--which became law and bans lawmakers from trading on nonpublic information and requires lawmakers to disclose stock trades. And, it is why I am a cosponsor of the Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act, led by Senator Ossoff, which would ban Members of Congress from owning or trading individual stocks and similar investments while in office. But instead of voting on that legislation today, Senate Republicans brought to the floor a bill that would continue to let members own and sell stocks and to trade stocks in privately held companies and therefore potentially profit from insider knowledge. As someone who has never owned individual stocks, I believe this bill simply isn’t strong enough. I am also disappointed that congressional Republicans have attached unrelated provisions to this legislation that would undermine voting rights. The bill includes provisions to restrict access to the ballot box that are more severe than any law in any state. The bill would effectively end voting by mail and create new burdens for voters and election officials. Nothing is more fundamental to our democracy than our free and fair elections and the right of Americans to exercise their constitutional right to vote. Voting is how the American people make their voices heard and ensure their elected leaders are held accountable. While I have long supported efforts to ensure that lawmakers cannot use insider information to profit off of their elected office, we should not be making it harder for eligible Americans to cast their ballot. For that reason, I opposed the bill.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 155

  1. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--H.r. 4238 3 statements
  2. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 5438 3 statements
  3. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 5435 (Executive Session) 3 statements
  4. Senate National Park System Long-Term Lease Investment Act 13 statements
  5. Senate Taxpayer Assistance and Service Act 43 statements
  6. Senate House Bills 2 statements
  7. Senate License to Drill Act 3 statements
  8. Senate Health Care Cybersecurity and Resiliency Act of 2026 2 statements
  9. Senate Executive Calendar 2 statements
  10. Senate Mystic Alerts Act 2 statements
  11. Senate End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act 13 statements
  12. Senate Stop Insider Trading Act 1 statement
  13. Senate Statements on Introduced Bills and Joint Resolutions 3 statements
  14. Senate Privileges of the Floor 2 statements