Ratepayer Protection Act

The Senate considered a motion to proceed to the Ratepayer Protection Act, a bill about who pays for electric grid upgrades needed to serve very large customers like data centers. It would require state regulators and utilities to consider a standard under which large-load customers cover the full incremental cost of any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrades needed to serve them, including financial assurances before upgrades are made. Senator Heinrich spoke in opposition, saying electricity demand is growing largely because of data centers and tech companies’ promises to pay their share have not held; he argued the bill only asks states to consider such a standard rather than requiring it, and urged a no vote.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

No matching statements

No statements match this filter

Choose another party or return to all statements.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 155

  1. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--H.r. 4238 3 statements
  2. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 5438 3 statements
  3. Senate Ratepayer Protection Act 1 statement
  4. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 5435 (Executive Session) 3 statements
  5. Senate National Park System Long-Term Lease Investment Act 13 statements
  6. Senate Taxpayer Assistance and Service Act 43 statements
  7. Senate House Bills 2 statements
  8. Senate License to Drill Act 3 statements
  9. Senate Health Care Cybersecurity and Resiliency Act of 2026 2 statements
  10. Senate Executive Calendar 2 statements
  11. Senate Mystic Alerts Act 2 statements
  12. Senate End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act 13 statements
  13. Senate Statements on Introduced Bills and Joint Resolutions 3 statements
  14. Senate Privileges of the Floor 2 statements