Directing the President, Pursuant to Section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to Remove United States Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran

This was a War Powers Resolution directing the President to remove U.S. armed forces from hostilities with Iran. Democratic senators including Kim, Schiff, Klobuchar, Murphy, Baldwin, Welch, and Kaine argued the President began the war without congressional approval, that it had lasted over six months, cost billions of dollars, killed around 18 or 19 U.S. servicemembers, strained the military, and driven up fuel and other prices, and they urged the Senate to pass the resolution to bring troops home. Much of the floor time was spent on unrelated matters, including a bipartisan connected-vehicle security bill, a resolution on Chinese government intimidation abroad, the farm bill, artificial intelligence safety legislation, and tributes to departing chiefs of staff. The resolution was rejected by a vote of 49 to 50.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Bernie Moreno, OH

Republican
“I want to thank the senator from Michigan for working with me on this bill. We do not agree on much, but we worked well together here.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, I would like to acknowledge my colleague from Michigan for working so well together on this bill. We don’t agree on a lot. We do agree 100 percent that Ohio State has a better football team.

Bernie Moreno, OH

Republican
“I want the Senate to pass the Connected Vehicle Security Act next week, and I want the House to pass it soon after. China is trying to take over the car market and destroy American car companies. Millions of good American manufacturing jobs depend on us protecting our car industry from China.”
Official Congressional Record

But, look, I think, for the people watching, Americans ultimately--whether you are a Democrat or a Republican or an Independent, you just want a government that works for you. You want a government that functions, that isn’t chaotic, that is actually laser- targeted on not only fixing problems but avoiding problems. This is a huge problem that is coming up. If you were to go back in a time machine about 26 years, in this Chamber, they passed a bill called the China Normalization Act. The idea was that if we could normalize relations with China, China would enter the World Trade Organization, and it would be absolutely phenomenal for the United States because we would get a place to make things really inexpensively. But what has happened over 25 years, 26 years is that China has built a massive military machine. We go into meeting after meeting, and whether it is election integrity and the assault on that, whether it is the assault on our critical infrastructure, whether it is the fact that they have blatantly stolen our intellectual property--you were the Ambassador to Japan. You dealt with this every day, with the Japanese saying: Look, the threats from China are real; they are ever present. If we only could have avoided that vote 26 years ago. I can tell you that what we are talking about here today is even more existential. As my colleague from Michigan mentioned, it was the auto industry uniquely that built the middle class in this country. I believe that in a future time, a future Congress, we are going to unite, Republicans and Democrats, around one simple concept: that our job here collectively is to make certain that an American citizen can graduate from high school and get a good enough paying job that they can afford a home, afford to get married, afford to start a family, be able to live in a safe community, and most importantly, retire with dignity. It seems to me that is actually the essence of the American dream. But these jobs are few and far between. They are hard to get. The auto industry can do that. Let me show just a little chart here for my colleagues. It shows just how important the auto industry is to America--963,000 factory jobs, direct factory jobs. In your State, I don’t have to tell you--I can only imagine how many auto plants you have visited, whether it is Nissan in Smyrna, GM in Spring Hill, or Volkswagen in Chattanooga. You have autos all over your State. These are really, really good jobs. The people who work in those factories meet the definition I just said. We have to make certain, as policymakers, that we do everything possible to make certain those jobs are protected. If you look at the entire auto industry, when you look at the supply chain--because there are a lot of pieces and parts that go into a car. It is the second largest purchase somebody will make after their home. Mr. President, 2.4 million good, high-paying jobs--these are not minimum-wage jobs; these are family-sustaining wages--and 11 million jobs when you think about the effects. In Chattanooga, TN, the fact that Volkswagen is there, you have all kinds of businesses that exist because of the employment there, because of those wages that allow people to buy homes, spend money. Now, what is the counter? What is the threat here? What are we really doing? China understands this, I think, better than we do, honestly-- the importance of building their middle class--so what they have done over the last two decades is targeted the auto industry, not to compete in the auto industry but to conquer the auto industry, to create what I have dubbed ``automotive fentanyl’’ where they create these predators that go out and don’t just compete--because General Motors, Ford, Toyota--you name it--can compete with any car company on Earth. They can’t compete with a country that is hell-bent on total conquest. They now make almost four times as many cars as we do here in America. They export almost as many cars as we make here in America. While their domestic market is dropping, they are producing ever more cars. They need to feed that beast. They need to feed that machine. So what do they do? They go into countries like Germany where, when you are born, the first words from your parents are ``You have to buy a German car.’’ Thirty-four percent of hybrids sold in Germany last month were Chinese--in a country that is culturally inclined to buy German vehicles. You look at countries like Ecuador. Fifty-seven percent of the new cars sold in Ecuador are Chinese vehicles. Mexico and Canada are starting to go there. All over the world, you are starting to see this total domination. In the case of Germany again, Volkswagen Group, which is partially owned by a government entity in Germany, for the first time in their history had to lay off 150,000 workers. Why? Because they can’t compete with the nation of China that is hell-bent on destroying their industries. This is the reality of what we are talking about--$1.2 trillion in GDP. This is what is at stake. So I will conclude with this. It is really hard to pass legislation. We know that. Our Founders wanted it that way. They wanted to make certain that two Senators from every State, big or small, would have to come together to figure out how to get to a compromise. That requires enormous effort. Introducing bills that will never pass--that is easy. We keep the clerks very busy with papers for bills that will never pass. This is a bill that has almost 100 out of 100 Senators on board. People have totally different ideological points of view, but on this, we have united, which is we cannot allow this threat to happen. I am confident and hopeful that I can come back to you, Mr. President, next week with my colleague from Michigan and that we can pass the Connected Vehicle Security Act and that when the House comes back on November 8, that the House take up an identical version of this bill that Congressman Moolenaar and Congresswoman Dingell have been working on and that we can get this bill in the hands of the President. I know that he feels the same way I do, which is that we are not going to let these cars into our market; we are going to make certain that we defend the U.S. auto industry. So thank you again to my colleague for the hard work. Thank you to all of my colleagues in the U.S. Senate that have provided input and have gotten us to the point where we have a phenomenal piece of legislation. I am very, very hopeful that we will absolutely get this done next week. I yield the floor.

Rand Paul, KY

Republican
“I oppose this resolution. I am strongly against Chinese communism, but passing symbolic insults against visiting leaders hurts our diplomacy. We need a working relationship with China, and this measure does not help American interests.”
  • Speech in the House

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 5 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, reserving the right to object, as the author of ``The Case Against Socialism,’’ I take a backseat to no one in my opposition of socialism, communism, or any other form of collectivism. In ``The Case Against Socialism,’’ I wrote: My concern is far greater that America will succumb to socialism by choice than by foreign invasion. The question is, Will this next generation follow the path of previous generations? Will today’s youth emerge from their parents’ basements and begin to earn a living, discover that their success depends on their merit and hard work or will they succumb to the allure of something for nothing? In ``The Case Against Socialism,’’ I pull no punches about the tyranny and violence of Mao and the panopticon of China’s surveillance state today. But I draw a distinction between articulating the horrors of Chinese authoritarianism and Senate resolutions intended to embarrass Chinese leaders who are visiting our country. The art of diplomacy is the art of pulling punches, avoiding insult, attempting to find common ground. Diplomacy creates a space to refer to someone as ``President’’ even though the world knows they were elected by a small group in a single-party state. The leadership between the United States and China is the most consequential of the 21st century. As such, we should strive to at least have decent working relations with one another. That is why I fully support President Trump’s overture to meet with President Xi. We should not advance symbolic condemnation that unnecessarily undermines United States-China diplomacy with no tangible benefit to United States’ interests. Instead, we should encourage more United States-China dialogue given the consequences of a hostile relationship, not symbolically poke them in the eye before the first state visit in 10 years. Diplomacy is fast becoming a lost art. I, for one, hope that President Trump’s diplomacy will lessen the tensions between the United States and China. I, therefore, object.

Deb Fischer, NE

Republican
“I want the Senate to pass the new farm bill. Our farmers and ranchers are struggling with drought and high costs, and the old farm law expired years ago. This bill permanently allows year-round sales of E15 fuel, helps farmers buy new technology, protects food programs for Native American tribes, and helps ranchers rebuild after wildfires.”
  • Speech in the House

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 8 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, the last time that Congress passed a full farm bill was in 2018; that was 8 years ago, and that law expired in 2023. We should have passed a new bill by then, but Congress has only passed short-term extensions. A lot has changed over the past 8 years, and the farm economy looks vastly different. To be frank, America’s farmers and ranchers are struggling. Drought, high input costs and low yields have made it a very trying time. I heard some of these concerns firsthand in August during a livestock roundtable in Crawford, NE. I also heard this at our State fair where I listened to ag producers from across our State. These producers are in dire need of a modern farm bill, and we owe it to them--the people who feed, fuel, and clothe us all--to enact policies that promote stability and markets to sell their products. I keep this goal front and center as a member of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee. And I am proud to say that last week, we advanced the farm bill out of committee. We are one step closer to giving America’s farmers and ranchers the long-term certainty that they need. But I am disappointed in how long it took us to get there. You know, we first tried to move the farm bill in July. The Agriculture Committee took a vote, but it failed. Every Republican voted yes. Every single Democrat voted no. This was particularly disappointing given that this year’s farm bill includes numerous priorities led by Democrats. Republicans worked in good faith to include their legislation to help the producers in their States. I am proud of those bipartisan priorities in this bill. I worked with Chairman Boozman to build policies that support a safe, steady supply of food, fuel, and fiber. Importantly, our bill also includes locking in permanent year-round E15. This is one of the most direct ways that Congress can provide relief without subsidies, by strengthening domestic demand for corn and ethanol. We cannot continue to operate on the current waiver system. For 8 years now, we have needed a Presidential waiver for E15 to be sold during the summertime. And these waivers, they have been granted every year. But this uncertainty makes it harder for producers and retailers to invest and plan. Permanent year-round E15, well, that would create a consistent, predictable market. It would allow farmers, ethanol plants, and fuel stations to operate with confidence. Our biofuels producers and our retailers need that certainty. They deserve a stable market 12 months out of the year, and I have been fighting for this for over a decade. It is long overdue. Unfortunately, there is a lot of misinformation out there circulating around E15. Let me be clear: This bill is not a government mandate. It simply gives fuel retailers the choice if they want to sell E15 at their gas station. And it also gives consumers a choice to fill up with E15 at the gas pump and to save some money. The Environmental Protection Agency confirmed that E15 is completely safe in cars made in 2001 or later. Let me repeat that. If you have a vehicle manufactured in 2001 or later, E15 can be used in your car. It does not hurt your engine. So please, colleagues, public, quit saying that. E15 expands domestic fuel options using American-grown corn. This reduces vulnerability to global supply shocks. A more diverse energy mix of oil, gas, renewables, nuclear, and biofuels makes the United States harder to pressure, and it makes us more resilient in times of conflict and disruption. In addition to E15, this year’s farm bill includes my precision ag package, three bills that will help America’s producers harness the full potential of precision agriculture. We need to make it more affordable for our farmers and ranchers to be able to access these cutting-edge tools. In turn, we can help their operations become more productive, more efficient, and less resource intensive. This farm bill also includes my legislation to prevent future food shortages in our Tribal nutrition programs. By incorporating input from Tribes on contracting decisions, we can strengthen this important resource for communities that depend upon it. And I was very, very happy to work with my Tribes in making sure that we got that included in this bill. Additionally, I secured a provision to safeguard Federal conservation funds from being exploited by America’s adversaries. This is going to protect U.S. taxpayers and our domestic manufacturers from being taken advantage of. And, finally, I am very pleased to see my colleague Senator Ricketts’ FENCE Act included, a bill that I cosponsored. Senator Ricketts’ bill will give farmers and ranchers an opportunity to use virtual fencing as they build and recover from natural disasters, and this is especially helpful after the historic and devastating wildfires that blazed across Nebraska earlier this year. All of these provisions are needed. Together, they make a 2026 farm bill a strong bipartisan legislation that truly serves our farmers, our ranchers, and rural Americans. As a committee, we did the work. We agreed to include good bills from both Democrats and Republicans. We built strong bipartisan support for year-round E15. We offered a fair compromise on SNAP cost-share concerns. We compromised on many items, and now we need to get this done. Let’s pass the farm bill. Let’s give America’s farmers and ranchers the stability that they need. To my colleagues, please, join me, and let’s get this over the finish line. I yield the floor.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 152

  1. Senate Legislative Session 5 statements
  2. Senate Directing the President, Pursuant to Section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to Remove United States Armed Forces from Hostilities with Iran 23 statements
  3. Senate Statements on Introduced Bills and Joint Resolutions 6 statements
  4. Senate Resolutions Submitted Today 2 statements