Nomination of Daniel Mack Traynor (Executive Session)
The Senate considered the nomination of Daniel Mack Traynor during an executive session. Senator Durbin spoke against the nomination, saying that before his confirmation to the district court Judge Traynor showed himself to be a partisan, and that in more than six years on the bench he has not acted as a neutral arbiter, ruling in favor of Donald Trump and bringing political bias into the courtroom. Durbin urged senators to vote against the nomination. No other substantive statements appear in the sampled discussion.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .
No matching statements
No statements match this filter
Choose another party or return to all statements.
More from issue 121
- House of Representatives Removing Barriers to Work for Disabled Americans Act 8 statements
- Senate Legislative Session 6 statements
- Senate Directing the Removal of United States Armed Forces from Hostilities Within or Against the Islamic Republic of Iran That Have Not Been Authorized by Congress--Motion to Discharge 6 statements
- Senate Nomination of Daniel Mack Traynor (Executive Session) 1 statement
- Senate Vote on Pozos Nomination (Executive Calendar) 2 statements