SAVE America Act (Executive Calendar)

The Senate debated the SAVE America Act, which would require people to provide proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote and to show photo identification when voting. Senator Lummis, a Republican, spoke in favor, saying the requirements are simple and popular with most Americans, and compared the ID requirement to rules requiring athletes to compete based on birth sex. This was a single floor statement in support of the bill, with no opposing statements in the sample provided.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Cynthia M. Lummis, WY

Republican
“I want the Senate to pass the SAVE Act. It requires people to prove they are citizens to register to vote, and to show photo ID when they cast a ballot. Most Americans support this, just like most Americans want athletes to compete only against people of their same birth sex.”
  • Speech in the House

    Signal 43 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, I rise today to talk about a bill that, at its core, asks for something almost embarrassingly simple: That the person registering to vote in an American election is actually an American citizen and that the person showing up to cast the ballot is actually who they say they are. The SAVE Act does not reinvent our elections. It does not add redtape for the sake of redtape. It asks for documentary proof of citizenship at registration and identification at the ballot box--the same basic verification we already accept without complaint when we board an airplane, open a bank account, or pick up a prescription. If we trust that system to protect a checking account, we should trust it enough to protect the vote. That is not extremism. That is common sense, and it is long past time this Chamber treated it that way. This past Saturday, I was riding in the Cheyenne Frontier Days parade alongside Senator Barrasso. Cheyenne is my hometown. It is the world’s largest outdoor rodeo. And we have great parades--four of them--during the course of the week of the world’s largest outdoor rodeo. It is an exceptional tradition in my hometown. Senator Barrasso and I are riding along the parade route, the same parade route Wyoming has watched for generations. And as we came down the street, I could hear it from my constituents over and over: Pass the SAVE Act, Senator. Pass the SAVE Act. Not once. Not from just one corner of the crowd, all along the parade route. That is not a talking point; that just happened last weekend. That is the people of Wyoming telling us what they want. So, I came home from that parade wondering if Wyoming was maybe a little ahead of the country on this. It turns out, Wyoming is right where the country already is. And it turns out these constituents aren’t just in line with the people of Wyoming; they are in line with the country. A Gallup poll found 84 percent of U.S. adults favor requiring photo identification to vote. In that same poll, 83 percent--just one less-- support requiring proof of citizenship for new voter registrants. Mr. President, 83 percent. That includes 71 percent of self-identified Democrats and an overwhelming majority of Independents. In this town, we can’t get 83 percent of anybody to agree on the weather. This is not controversial outside the walls of this building. It has simply become controversial inside them. Would we expect to go to Mexico or Canada and walk into an election booth and have them let us vote in their elections without an ID, without proving we’re a Canadian citizen or a Mexican citizen? They would have nothing to do with the process that allowed a U.S. citizen to vote without identification in their elections. No country would. So is the opposition to this bill just another symptom of Trump derangement syndrome, where any policy this administration touches becomes reflexively toxic the moment it reaches this floor? Or do my colleagues across the aisle actually believe it is bad policy for only American citizens to decide American elections? Because, really, those are--as near as I can tell--the only two explanations on offer. The same is true of protecting girls’ and women’s sports. Gallup has found 69 percent of Americans believe athletes should compete on teams that match their biological sex. I am surprised it is not a higher number, but it is 69 percent. This is not a fringe position. It is the plainly stated view of most people in this country, arrived at through a basic, widely shared sense of fairness: That girls who train and compete deserve a level playing field where they can compete safely. They don’t have to worry about a man who identifies as a woman or as a transperson spiking a volleyball so hard that it does brain damage and causes concussions and lifelong injury to a young high school athlete. We owe that to our female athletes. Wyoming didn’t send me here to just spew political jargon, to play politics, because these things are simple; they are timeless; they are understood values. We can’t bend and shape thousands of years of common sense with new, woke ideology. Wyoming sent me here to conduct myself in a manner that reflects their common sense, their values. So it is time to send the SAVE Act to President Trump’s desk. I heard that on the parade route in Cheyenne, WY, last weekend, and I hear it on this floor. We need to pass the SAVE Act. I yield the floor.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 119

  1. House of Representatives High Cost of War 3 statements
  2. House of Representatives The Wonderful Mccourt Family 2 statements
  3. House of Representatives Recognizing University at Buffalo President Satish Tripathi 2 statements
  4. House of Representatives Recognizing Robert Bentley 3 statements
  5. House of Representatives Recognizing Pamela Irvine 3 statements
  6. House of Representatives Remembering Wes Anderson 3 statements
  7. House of Representatives Legacy of American Liberty 3 statements
  8. House of Representatives Honoring James Robert Yaroszeufski 4 statements
  9. House of Representatives Recognizing Colorado Army National Guard Aviators 5 statements
  10. House of Representatives No Data Centers 2 statements
  11. House of Representatives Recognizing Final Flight of A-10 at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2 statements
  12. House of Representatives Recognizing Vance Taylor on His Retirement 5 statements
  13. House of Representatives Providing for Consideration of H.R. 8800, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027; Providing for Consideration of H.R. 8884, Removing Barriers to Work for Disabled Americans Act... 15 statements
  14. House of Representatives Main Street Capital Access Act 24 statements
  15. House of Representatives Continuing Appropriations Act, 2027 7 statements
  16. House of Representatives National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 23 statements
  17. House of Representatives National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 29 statements
  18. Senate SAVE America Act (Executive Calendar) 1 statement
  19. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 807 (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  20. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 808 (Executive Calendar) 4 statements
  21. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 557 (Executive Calendar) 3 statements
  22. Senate Artificial Intelligence (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  23. Senate Authority for Committees to Meet 2 statements
  24. Senate Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act 2 statements