Spending Aviation Fees for Equipment, Guaranteeing Upgraded and Advanced Risk Detection and Safety Act of 2026

The House debated the SAFEGUARDS Act (H.R. 8770), which redirects revenue from the 9/11 passenger security fee into funds for TSA aviation security, increasing money available for checked baggage explosives detection equipment and creating a new fund for checkpoint screening technology. Republicans, including bill sponsor Dale Strong, said the fee revenue should be spent on airport security as passengers expect rather than diverted elsewhere, and that the bill does not raise taxes or add fees. Democrat James Walkinshaw said the goal of getting TSA newer screening equipment faster is a good one but raised concerns that the bill does not pay for the equipment and could lead to cuts in TSA workers’ pay and benefits; he said he would work with both parties to avoid unintended consequences for TSA workers. The debate stayed on the bill itself.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

James R. Walkinshaw, VA

Democrat
“This bill helps TSA buy newer airport screening equipment faster. That is a good goal, but the bill does not pay for this new equipment. I worry it will lead to pay and benefit cuts for TSA workers. We must support the workers who use this equipment, not just buy new machines.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, since the Transportation Security Administration was created after the 9/11 attacks, the agency has been working to deploy the latest innovative security screening technology to ensure prohibited items carried inside bags and on individuals do not make it past a security checkpoint and onto an aircraft. However, with thousands of TSA screening lanes across the country in need of technology, Congress has at times struggled to provide funding to recapitalize technology expeditiously across all airports. H.R. 8770, the SAFEGUARDS Act, would ensure there are increased dedicated funds available to TSA to procure the latest screening technology so that the agency can replace aging technology deployed at airports at a more rapid pace. Although speeding up the deployment of new screening technology is an important goal, I do have some reservations about the bill. The increased investments in technology are not paid for, and I am concerned that these increases could result in cuts to funding for TSA workforce salaries and benefits if TSA’s overall budget does not increase. Although the bill does contain language reinforcing the sense of Congress that diversions of passenger security fees away from TSA’s coffers should end, the bill does not actually do anything to end those diversions sooner than already scheduled under current law or otherwise to bring in more money to TSA. House Democrats have long been supportive of investments in new and innovative security technologies, but we must also make sure that we are supporting the workforce that operates those technologies. To start, the House should take up Ranking Member Thompson’s bill, H.R. 2086, the Rights for the TSA Workforce Act, which would codify fair pay and collective bargaining rights for this critical workforce. This bill has more than 185 bipartisan cosponsors, and the Republican majority should bring it to this floor. In the meantime, I look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, as well as our colleagues in the Senate, to ensure that the SAFEGUARDS Act, if enacted, drives investments in technology without causing cuts to pay, benefits, or staffing at TSA. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

James R. Walkinshaw, VA

Democrat
“I support this bill because it gives TSA workers better safety tools faster to protect travelers. I want to work with both parties to make sure it does not harm TSA workers.”
  • Speech on a bill

    Clarity 11 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 8770 will help ensure TSA’s frontline staff get more of the tools they need to keep travelers safe, and at a faster pace. I look forward to working with our colleagues on both sides of the aisle to ensure there are no unintended consequences for TSA’s workforce if this bill becomes law. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 113

  1. House of Representatives Honoring Life and Career of Don Detwiler 5 statements
  2. House of Representatives Congressman Gerald E. Connolly Post Office Building 7 statements
  3. House of Representatives Ulysses S. Grant Post Office Building 5 statements
  4. House of Representatives Spending Aviation Fees for Equipment, Guaranteeing Upgraded and Advanced Risk Detection and Safety Act of 2026 7 statements
  5. House of Representatives Improving Travel for Military Members Act 5 statements
  6. House of Representatives Homeland Security Capabilities Preservation Reporting Act of 2026 5 statements
  7. House of Representatives Reimbursable Screening Services Program Extension Act of 2026 3 statements
  8. House of Representatives One-Stop Pilot Program Extension Act 7 statements
  9. House of Representatives Weatherizing Infrastructure in the North and Terrorism Emergency Readiness Act of 2025 5 statements
  10. House of Representatives Improving Travel for American Families Act 5 statements
  11. House of Representatives Major Non-Nato Ally Terror Threat Assessment Act 4 statements
  12. House of Representatives Measuring Illicit Fentanyl Trafficking Act 4 statements
  13. House of Representatives Elo Realignment and Strategic Engagement Reform Act of 2026 6 statements
  14. House of Representatives Stop Foreign Funds in Elections Act 8 statements
  15. House of Representatives Fec Administrative Improvements Act 4 statements
  16. House of Representatives In Memory of Senator Lindsey Graham 2 statements
  17. Senate Remembering Lindsey Graham (Executive Session) 2 statements
  18. Senate National Defense Authorization Act (Executive Session) 2 statements
  19. Senate Vote on Jones Nomination (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  20. Senate Orders for Tuesday, July 14, 2026 2 statements