Elo Realignment and Strategic Engagement Reform Act of 2026

The House debated H.R. 7574, the ELO Realignment and Strategic Engagement Reform Act of 2026, which requires the Department of Homeland Security to develop and submit to Congress a plan to reorganize its Engagement, Liaison, and Outreach (ELO) Office, identify redundant or non-essential positions and functions, and realign essential functions within the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, with certain staffing and budget limits applying until the plan is submitted. Republicans, including Representatives Garbarino and Evans, said the bill would cut duplication and improve intelligence sharing among federal, state, and local partners. Representative Walkinshaw, a Democrat, said he supported the bill’s goals for engaging state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement but asked that the department consult Congress before any staff reductions and raised concern that the language on redundancies could be used to cut funding for intelligence work. Republicans responded that they were aligned on the bill’s aims, and members urged its passage.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

James R. Walkinshaw, VA

Democrat
“This bill reorganizes an office in the Department of Homeland Security so it can work better with local police. It also looks for duplicate jobs to cut. I want the department to talk with Congress before it cuts any workers. Firing staff could hurt our ability to share intelligence and stop cyber attacks.”
Official Congressional Record

Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, engagement with State, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement is essential to the Department of Homeland Security’s mission to secure the homeland. State and local law enforcement partners must have clear points of contact within DHS to maximize information sharing and collaboration on issues like emergency and cybersecurity incident response. H.R. 7574 aims to ensure this by directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to realign the functions and personnel within the Office of Intelligence and Analysis’ Engagement, Liaison, and Outreach office. Madam Speaker, while it is important for State and local officials to have clear points of contact at DHS for information sharing and collaboration, H.R. 7574’s requirement to identify redundancies at the Office of Intelligence and Analysis should not, I hope, be viewed as a pretext to reduce I&A’s workforce. I&A is charged with delivering timely and actionable intelligence to our law enforcement on the front lines and unnecessarily slashing their capacity could unintentionally create security gaps and make our communities more vulnerable to cyber terror attacks and other threats. While I understand that H.R. 7574 seeks to improve DHS relationships with law enforcement agencies by establishing clear communication protocols and centralizing points of contact for law enforcement engagement, I urge DHS to consult with Congress on the implementation of this bill and before any staffing changes or reductions are made. We need to strengthen, not undermine I&A’s ability to protect the homeland. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

James R. Walkinshaw, VA

Democrat
“I support this bill. I just want to make sure it is not used to cut funding for intelligence work at the Department of Homeland Security.”
  • Speech on a bill

    Signal 35 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Madam Speaker, I appreciate the gentleman’s and the committee’s work on H.R. 7574, and it sounds like, I think, that we are in alignment. I just want to be sure that the language in the bill referring to redundancies isn’t used to defund the I&A at the Department of Homeland Security. It sounds like the gentleman and I are on the same page. Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 113

  1. House of Representatives Honoring Life and Career of Don Detwiler 5 statements
  2. House of Representatives Congressman Gerald E. Connolly Post Office Building 7 statements
  3. House of Representatives Ulysses S. Grant Post Office Building 5 statements
  4. House of Representatives Spending Aviation Fees for Equipment, Guaranteeing Upgraded and Advanced Risk Detection and Safety Act of 2026 7 statements
  5. House of Representatives Improving Travel for Military Members Act 5 statements
  6. House of Representatives Homeland Security Capabilities Preservation Reporting Act of 2026 5 statements
  7. House of Representatives Reimbursable Screening Services Program Extension Act of 2026 3 statements
  8. House of Representatives One-Stop Pilot Program Extension Act 7 statements
  9. House of Representatives Weatherizing Infrastructure in the North and Terrorism Emergency Readiness Act of 2025 5 statements
  10. House of Representatives Improving Travel for American Families Act 5 statements
  11. House of Representatives Major Non-Nato Ally Terror Threat Assessment Act 4 statements
  12. House of Representatives Measuring Illicit Fentanyl Trafficking Act 4 statements
  13. House of Representatives Elo Realignment and Strategic Engagement Reform Act of 2026 6 statements
  14. House of Representatives Stop Foreign Funds in Elections Act 8 statements
  15. House of Representatives Fec Administrative Improvements Act 4 statements
  16. House of Representatives In Memory of Senator Lindsey Graham 2 statements
  17. Senate Remembering Lindsey Graham (Executive Session) 2 statements
  18. Senate National Defense Authorization Act (Executive Session) 2 statements
  19. Senate Vote on Jones Nomination (Executive Calendar) 2 statements
  20. Senate Orders for Tuesday, July 14, 2026 2 statements