← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal and Clarity. Average 57 / 100
Signal
65 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
49 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 33% Claims 67%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Thanks · 19 words Fortunately, for--let me say to Senator Murray that I so appreciate your presentation, and particularly talking about the algorithms. Thanks Claims · 41 words And, also, the fact is that under what you have described very clearly, the big winner under this flawed experiment is a bunch of middlemen who are trying to profit off denials, Unearned certainty and not the people who really desperately need care. Thanks · 6 words So I very much appreciate it, Thanks Claims · 23 words and Oregon is proud to be a partner with Washington State in leading the country to get rid of this very flawed idea. Thanks · 7 words And I thank you for your remarks. Thanks
At a glance
Lost points for Thanks ×4 Unearned certainty Vague Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 65
4 of 5 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Fortunately, for--let me say to Senator Murray that I so appreciate your presentation,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “and particularly talking about the algorithms.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “So I very much appreciate it,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “And I thank you for your remarks.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · no score
No score: nothing is concluded. Excluded from the average.
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Conclusions found · 0
None: nothing is concluded.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 49
1 of 5 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “the fact is” A fact-framing formula stands in for a source for the claim about who benefits.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
