Michael Guest

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 9 wordsI yield myself such time as I may consume.Procedure Mr. Speaker, Claims · 615 wordsas the chair of the Committee on Ethics, I rise in support of the resolutions which call for Michael Joseph and Hector Roos to be held in contempt of Congress for their failure to comply with documentary and testimonial subpoenas issued on September 11, 2025, ¹and August 12, 2026, respectively. Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution provides that each House may punish its Members for disorderly behavior, ²and with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a Member. The House has charged the Committee on Ethics with the duty of implementing this provision on its behalf. The committee recommends and enforces ethical standards that ensure Members and staff act in a manner befitting the public trust. Pursuant to that authority, the House has authorized the committee and its subcommittees to require by subpoena or otherwise the attendance and testimony of such witnesses and their production of such books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, ³and documents as it considers necessary to carry out its investigative functions. House rules do not specify that personal service is the only method of effecting service of its subpoenas. An individual has a legal obligation to comply with a duly issued and valid congressional subpoena, unless a valid privilege or other legal justification excuses compliance. An individual who fails to comply with a House subpoena may be cited for contempt of Congress. In this case, the committee impaneled an investigative subcommittee to inquire into certain allegations regarding former Representative Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick.⁴ In order to conduct a thorough investigation, the investigative subcommittee authorized, and the committee issued, subpoenas for documents and testimonies to Mr. Joseph and Mr. Roos. Mr. Roos was a senior campaign staffer who filed inaccurate reports with the Federal Election Commission and made in kind contributions to the campaign.⁵ Mr. Roos was served with documentary and testimonial subpoenas issued on August 12, 2025, by the United States Marshals Service.⁶ He did not appear for his deposition on September 25, 2025, ⁷nor did he produce the documents at any time. Mr. Roos did not provide a valid legal justification for his noncompliance. Mr. Joseph was the President of a company that improperly provided corporate funds for the Congresswoman’s campaign and influenced her staff to submit community funding project requests for entities that he supported.⁸ Mr. Joseph was served with documentary and testimonial subpoenas issued on March 11, 2025.⁹ Mr. Joseph accepted service.¹⁰ Later, he responded he could not comply because as an attorney it would violate attorney-client privilege.¹¹ Committee rules provide that the presiding member of the subcommittee may consider objections on the basis of privilege and request his objection be put in writing. Although Mr. Joseph did not do so, the investigative subcommittee nonetheless considered his objection and determined it was not a valid assertion of the attorney-client privilege.¹² Nonetheless, Mr. Joseph did not appear for his deposition on October 7, 2025, ¹³nor did he produce documents at any time. Mr. Joseph did not provide a valid legal justification for his noncompliance. The investigative subcommittee offered both Mr. Roos and Mr. Joseph a final opportunity to comply with subpoenas, but neither did so. Therefore, the investigative subcommittee voted on March 18, 2026, to adopt reports recommending the committee submit a resolution recommending the House cite Mr. Roos and Mr. Joseph for contempt of Congress pursuant to 2 U.S.C.¹⁴ 194 and 192. On May 13, 2026, the committee adopted its own reports incorporating by reference the reports of the investigative subcommittee and concurring with this recommendation.¹⁵ The reports were transmitted to the Clerk of the House and made public on June 22, 2026, ¹⁶and have been made available to Members of the House and the public on the committee’s website since Friday.¹⁷ Reasoning · 29 wordsThe committee cannot fulfill its obligations to safeguard the integrity of the House when witnesses ignore its subpoenas, and the House cannot accept such willful disregard of its authority. Claims · 48 wordsMr. Roos and Mr. Joseph willfully failed to comply with multiple subpoenas issued by the committee.¹⁸ They impeded the investigative subcommittee’s investigations into the allegations concerning former Representative Cherfilus-McCormick. Those allegations were serious and included violations of Federal law to which Mr. Roos and Mr. Joseph were party.¹⁹ Reasoning · 15 wordsTheir conduct warrants referrals to the United States Department of Justice for contempt of Congress. Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsI reserve the balance of my time.Procedure