Stop Insider Trading Act

The Senate debated the Stop Insider Trading Act, a bill about stock trading by members of Congress. Senator Schumer, a Democrat, spoke against a Republican stock trading bill, saying it does not actually ban trading because it would let members keep owning, selling, and in some cases buying stocks, and saying it does not address trading by Donald Trump. He also objected to voting-related provisions he described as extreme, and said Congress should pass a bill that fully bans congressional stock trading instead.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Charles E. Schumer, NY

Democrat

Linked statement

“I oppose the Republican stock trading bill. It does not actually ban trading. It lets members of Congress keep owning, selling, and even buying stock in companies they oversee. It also does nothing to stop Donald Trump from trading stocks, and it adds extreme voting restrictions meant to make the bill fail. We should pass real bills that close these loopholes and ban congressional stock trading.”
  • Speech on a bill

    Respect 95 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “twisted, radical schemes Trump has ever dreamed up to rig our election”.

    See full analysis
  • Speech on a bill

    Reasoning 100 of 100

    This statement drew 9 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.

    See full analysis
Official Congressional Record

Mr. President, on stock trading, only Senate Republicans would dare call a bill that permits Members of Congress to continue to own, sell, and in some instances buy stocks a stock trading ban. They can’t be serious. The Republican bill is a permission slip for corruption, not a stock trading ban. There has been a real bipartisan effort to ban Members of Congress from trading stocks and profiting off their insider information. I have supported those efforts for years. Last year, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs advanced a strong bipartisan bill that would actually ban stocks, not pretend to do so. Senate Republicans didn’t want it. The Senate GOP let their counterparts in the House take out all of the ban’s teeth and fill it with poison pills so it could never pass. This bill has no reform, no accountability, no substance. Republicans want to explicitly allow Members to continue trading stocks in privately held companies, including in companies the Members oversee; a formula for disaster and corruption. That is as clear a conflict of interest as one can imagine. Under the Republican bill, Members would still get to own and sell stocks, and most importantly, this bill doesn’t do anything--anything--to stop Donald Trump from trading stocks. I guess Republicans forgot that Trump has made nearly 30,000 stock trades in the past year and raked in billions--more than all of Congress combined. Democrats have offered multiple bills that would close all these loopholes. Republicans have done nothing to stop corruption; not in the White House, not in Congress, nowhere. The Republican toothless stock trading bill is as ineffective as a screen door on a submarine. Let’s be clear: They don’t even want it to pass. They designed the bill to fail. They loaded their legislation with poison pills that they knew would make this bill dead on arrival. They are even afraid of this wet noodle, weak milquetoast bill. The voting restrictions in this bill and the voting restrictions that they added as a poison pill are more extreme than any law in any State. It would make voting more difficult in every State than it is now. They are some of the most twisted, radical schemes Trump has ever dreamed up to rig our election. Republicans know no one wants these provisions, so they included them to kill their own bill. This hollow bill isn’t a stock trading ban; it is Republicans’ last-ditch effort to save face. If Republicans’ closing pitch is a bill that would let them continue to profit off their office and allow Trump to rig the election, that is their problem. Americans don’t buy it.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from issue 155

  1. Senate Stop Insider Trading Act 1 statement
  2. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--H.r. 4238 3 statements
  3. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 5438 3 statements
  4. Senate Unanimous Consent Request--S. 5435 (Executive Session) 3 statements
  5. Senate National Park System Long-Term Lease Investment Act 13 statements
  6. Senate Taxpayer Assistance and Service Act 43 statements
  7. Senate House Bills 2 statements
  8. Senate License to Drill Act 3 statements
  9. Senate Health Care Cybersecurity and Resiliency Act of 2026 2 statements
  10. Senate Executive Calendar 2 statements
  11. Senate Mystic Alerts Act 2 statements
  12. Senate End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act 13 statements
  13. Senate Statements on Introduced Bills and Joint Resolutions 3 statements
  14. Senate Privileges of the Floor 2 statements