MEMBER OF CONGRESS

Nydia M. Velazquez

Follow by RSS

Velazquez’s most recent floor statement, opposing a banking deregulation bill, centers on financial regulation and its effects on small businesses and underserved communities, drawing on her role as ranking member of the House Small Business Committee. She makes her case in concrete terms: she distinguishes what she supports (‘sensible tailoring’) from what she opposes, spells out specific harms she expects from the bill, and cites the number and types of outside organizations opposed to it. In this statement she argues from stated consequences rather than personal attacks on the bill’s supporters, though the reasons for some claims, such as the link between the bill and a future publicly financed bailout, are asserted rather than spelled out. With only one statement available, this is a narrow read rather than a settled pattern.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Not enough statements graded yet for an average.

Statements 1

House of Representatives ·

Main Street Capital Access Act

“I oppose this bill. It removes too many bank rules, weakens consumer protections, and makes another public bank bailout more likely.”
Official Congressional Record

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 6955. Community banks and credit unions are the foundations of our financial system. As ranking member of the House Small Business Committee, I understand better than most the role they play in our communities, offering small business loans, farm loans, and mortgages. They are critical lifelines to our rural and underserved communities that have been left behind by our biggest banks. While I believe in sensible tailoring to help community banks and credit unions do what they do best--deliver personalized products to meet the needs of their customers--this bill moves far beyond sensible tailoring. Instead of focusing on modest improvements, this package represents the largest amount of bank deregulation since before the financial crisis. It includes sweeping reforms that will not only significantly roll back necessary safeguards and weaken oversight, but it will also undermine consumer protection and antidiscrimination measures and hamper the CFPB’s ability to issue new rules. This deregulation package will push risk into the shadows and make the next publicly financed bailout more likely. This is especially concerning at a time when financial regulatory agencies are under political attack, pursuing industry-friendly agendas, and are starved of resources. That is why more than 25 labor, consumer, housing, economic justice, and public interest organizations are opposing this bill.