Discussion · Senate

Maria Cantwell Democrat

“College athletes got money from a court settlement, but that deal is not permanent. The Supreme Court left this issue to Congress, and that money could be lost. We need to pass this bill to permanently protect college athletes' right to share in this revenue.”
Official Congressional Record

I am asking a question. I would respectfully say to my colleague, without the $2.8 billion record revenue-sharing agreement in what is called Grant House v. NCAA, there would not be revenue sharing. The Court has not recognized revenue sharing. If you read the decision by Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh said Congress can decide these are not employees and they do not deserve revenue. Kavanaugh’s decision on NIL basically says: Congress, you can come back and say they don’t deserve a damn thing. A settlement agreement by injured athletes basically got that right, but that settlement agreement is tedious and could fall apart. Our recognizing that money and recognizing the revenue-sharing rights is a historic first. So I don’t know if you understand that $2.8 billion on behalf of athletes won in a settlement agreement is not a permanent right, but it will be after we pass this law.

No comments yet.

Comment rules