Discussion · House of Representatives
Brendan F. Boyle Democrat
“Republicans are avoiding the real issue, which is high costs for everyday people. Russia started the war in Ukraine, and we support Ukraine to protect peace in Europe. Republicans also claim they cut the debt, but their earlier plan actually added 4.7 trillion dollars to it. Congress should focus on bringing down high prices.”
“Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume. This has been a remarkable debate. It seems the other side wants to talk about pretty much any other issue than affordability. They want to talk about Ukraine, which I heard cited. Let me just correct what the chair said a few minutes ago. This is not the Democrats’ war in Ukraine. It is Mr. Putin’s war in Ukraine because he launched a brutal, unprovoked invasion on the people of Ukraine. The reason why the United States and our NATO allies have stood together in financially supporting freedom in Ukraine is because it is not just about Ukraine. It is about whether we will have peace in Europe or whether we will repeat the mistakes that got us into World War II. That used to be a bipartisan consensus, by the way, in this country for the last 80 years until this recent President. We also then heard an absurd charge that somehow the folks on the other side have brought down the deficit and debt. They even cited the CBO. That is funny because they have tended to ignore the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office when the CBO pointed out their bill last year, their big reconciliation 1.0, according to the CBO, added $4.7 trillion to our national debt, the biggest debt buster bill in American history. We can talk about all of these ancillary issues, or we can talk about what is the number one issue on people’s minds, which is that things are too damn expensive. They want costs to come down. Instead, under this Republican Congress, costs are only going through the roof. Mr. Chair, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. Omar), a very distinguished member of the Budget Committee.”
-
Speech on a bill
Relevance 7 of 100
Only 7% of this speech directly addressed the bill under debate.
See full analysis
Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume. This has been a remarkable debate. It seems the other side wants to talk about pretty much any other issue than affordability. They want to talk about Ukraine, which I heard cited. Let me just correct what the chair said a few minutes ago. This is not the Democrats’ war in Ukraine. It is Mr. Putin’s war in Ukraine because he launched a brutal, unprovoked invasion on the people of Ukraine. The reason why the United States and our NATO allies have stood together in financially supporting freedom in Ukraine is because it is not just about Ukraine. It is about whether we will have peace in Europe or whether we will repeat the mistakes that got us into World War II. That used to be a bipartisan consensus, by the way, in this country for the last 80 years until this recent President. We also then heard an absurd charge that somehow the folks on the other side have brought down the deficit and debt. They even cited the CBO. That is funny because they have tended to ignore the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office when the CBO pointed out their bill last year, their big reconciliation 1.0, according to the CBO, added $4.7 trillion to our national debt, the biggest debt buster bill in American history. We can talk about all of these ancillary issues, or we can talk about what is the number one issue on people’s minds, which is that things are too damn expensive. They want costs to come down. Instead, under this Republican Congress, costs are only going through the roof. Mr. Chair, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. Omar), a very distinguished member of the Budget Committee.