← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little. Not graded
Signal
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. President, Procedure · 54 words I ask unanimous consent that privileges of the floor be granted to Michael Kellermann, serving a detail from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Committee on Natural Resources, 1 and Francisco Alvarez, serving a fellowship from Sandia National Laboratories to the Committee on National Resources, for the duration of their assignments to the committee.2 Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×2
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 0
2 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I ask unanimous consent that privileges of the floor be granted to Michael Kellermann, serving a detail from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Committee on Natural Resources,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “and Francisco Alvarez, serving a fellowship from Sandia National Laboratories to the Committee on National Resources, for the duration of their assignments to the committee.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · no score
No score: nothing is concluded. Excluded from the average.
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Conclusions found · 0
None: nothing is concluded.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · no score
No score. Excluded from the average.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “serving a detail from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Committee on Natural Resources” Michael Kellermann was serving a detail from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources as of September 30, 2026. search 2 “serving a fellowship from Sandia National Laboratories to the Committee on National Resources” Francisco Alvarez was serving a fellowship from Sandia National Laboratories with the Senate Committee on Natural Resources as of September 30, 2026. search
