Claims 61% Procedure 9% The question 1% Reasoning 8% Positioning 20% The ask 2%
Structure · 41 steps
Claims · 20
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. President, Claims · 38 words 2 years ago, the American people elected a new Congress and a new President.1 Partly on point The American people did so based on a promise that the President and his allies in Congress would work to bring down high costs. Procedure · 27 words So now it is worth asking a simple question, one that the American people will ask their elected representatives when they return home in a few days: Procedure The question · 20 words Did the President and his allies in Congress make good on their pledge to bring down costs for American families? Procedure · 4 words The answer is clear: Procedure Unearned certainty Claims · 262 words No. Not only has the President failed to make good on his pledge to bring down costs, not only is it evident that he never even bothered to try, Unearned certainty but it is clear that on virtually every metric, it costs more to be an American than it did 2 years ago when this President was sworn in and the 119th Congress began.2 Logical leap It is worth taking a moment to go line by line, cost by cost, broken promise by broken promise, to examine the ways in which the President’s policies--including his tariffs and his war--have driven costs higher and higher. Before the President took office, he promised that he would bring gas prices down from $3 a gallon to less than $2.3 But under this President and his majorities in Congress, gas prices haven’t just failed to go down, they have instead shot up to around $4.50 a gallon, meaning gas costs 50 percent more now than when Donald Trump entered office.4 Since the President began his reckless war with Iran without a plan to win, the American people have paid an additional $93 billion on gas in less than a year, 5 Logical leap and, on average, each American family has had to spend $790 more on gas since this war began.6 And the President failed even more catastrophically to bring down diesel prices. Diesel now costs around $3 more a gallon than it did when the President took office.7 Farmers and truckers are weathering the highest prices for diesel in American history, with costs at the pump exceeding $6.50 a gallon last week.8 Reasoning · 36 words Now, it is one thing to fail on a promise to lower the price of something; it is quite another to be responsible for the highest price of that good ever recorded in our country’s history. Claims · 211 words The President also promised to make healthcare ``affordable again.’’ Of course, this is not at all what happened. Instead, the President gutted Medicaid to take away healthcare for millions of Americans in order to pay for tax giveaways to billionaires like himself. He also allowed health insurance premiums to surge, meaning more families now pay more for insurance every single month, even if they don’t get sick. Just before the President took office, the average monthly cost for health insurance was $468 a month.9 The President did not reduce those premiums by a dime. Instead, families now pay $611 a month.10 That is almost $150 more monthly, almost $2,000 more per year--$2,000--dollars that could otherwise be spent on the mortgage, the rent, repairs for the car, let alone parents just using it to do something nice for their kids.11 And what about the cost of groceries? The President promised repeatedly that he would bring down grocery costs. Well, let’s look at the numbers. Since the President took office, ground beef has risen to $7 a pound, 12 and coffee has risen from about $7 a pound to more than $9.13 Now, I don’t know if the President is right when he says that ``groceries’’ is an ``old-fashioned word,’’ as he often claims, Off point Reasoning · 16 words but I do know that old-fashioned math tells us that $9 is more expensive than $7. Procedure · 22 words And let’s say we take everything all together--all the goods and services that we pay for every day--and add it all up. Procedure Positioning · 15 words How much, if at all, did the President and his allies in Congress reduce costs? Positioning Claims · 48 words They failed to reduce costs at all. The American people have had to pay an additional $4,200 on goods and services since the President took office.14 The President had nearly 2 years to try to lower costs, and instead, families had $4,200 more taken out of their pockets. Logical leap Logical leap Procedure · 8 words This isn’t a partisan point. This isn’t spin. Procedure Claims · 23 words This is just basic mathematical facts--facts that make evident that the President both completely failed to lower costs and honestly didn’t even try. Positioning · 19 words So if the President failed to bring down costs, what has he been working on these last 2 years? Positioning Procedure · 8 words Well, the President’s been clear about his priorities. Procedure Off point Positioning · 18 words He is not interested in lowering costs for families. Partly on point He is interested in raising monuments to honor himself. Positioning Claims · 76 words He hosted military parades in his honor.15 He destroyed the East Wing to build himself a golden ballroom.16 He has been trying to put his name on other monuments. He is running taxpayer-funded ad campaigns praising himself. And, according to a new report from the Joint Economic Committee Minority, Off point while the American people are paying more to keep up with high costs, the President wants to spend $1.8 billion on projects to flatter his own vanity.17 Partly on point Procedure · 21 words Now, we throw lots of numbers around in Washington, but it is worth remembering what the American people know full well: Procedure Unearned certainty Reasoning · 14 words This is real money we are talking about. It is the American people’s money. Procedure · 7 words We owe it to them to ask: Procedure Positioning · 45 words How could that same $1.8 billion help them? Positioning What can $1.8 billion buy when it is not being diverted by an apprentice dictator, who, rightly fearing that no one will ever honor his Presidency after he is gone, rushes to build gilded tributes to himself? Off point Insult Mr. President, Procedure · 9 words $1.8 billion, it can buy a lot of things: Procedure Claims · 85 words It can pay for the electric bills for 12 million families for a month; it can fill up more than 35 million tanks of gas, even at the President’s new high prices; Partly on point it can buy 600 million school lunches, fully paid for, so our children can have a good, healthy meal at school; $1.8 billion could hire around 30,000 new firefighters to keep our communities safe; and it can pay all the medical expenses--every medical bill--for more than 88,000 American veterans for an entire year. Reasoning · 16 words If the President insists on spending the people’s money on himself, he owes them an explanation. Off point Procedure · 10 words So if I have one request today, it is this: Procedure The ask · 25 words I want the President to explain why a monument to honor himself is a better use of taxpayer dollars than paying for healthcare for veterans. Positioning · 75 words Is a ballroom to make one man feel like a King more important than healthcare for a year for the heroes who fought to keep our country free? Partly on point What more did America’s heroes--people who have given everything to this country--what more do they need to do to deserve the $1.8 billion that the President would rather spend to honor himself? And when in America did honoring service become less important than honoring one man’s ego? Positioning Claims · 20 words I know that a majority of Americans, including many of my Republican colleagues, also find the President’s vanity projects distasteful, Positioning · 36 words but I think we are all doing a bit of play-acting if we forget that the President’s determination to shower himself in honors is not simply excessive or distractions but is wrong and is distinctly un-American. Positioning Procedure · 4 words Consider our other Presidents. Procedure Claims · 99 words George Washington didn’t order the construction of the Washington Monument.18 Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson didn’t pick out sculptors to build their memorials. John F. Kennedy didn’t name the Kennedy Center.19 And none of them tried to put themselves on our currency. They received these honors from grateful citizens after their time in office. The current President is the only exception to this rule. George Washington was a rich man as well, but he used his wealth to support the Continental Army. He didn’t use his office to enrich himself, nor did he have any interest in being King. Off point Reasoning · 41 words The reason why this matters is because the President’s desire to appease his own vanity and his failure to bring down costs are linked because it is deeply telling that the President will go to such extravagant lengths to honor himself. Partly on point Motive imputed Claims · 89 words He will break with American values and precedent when they stand in the way of his whims; he will use a wrecking ball to tear down buildings; he will spend great time and effort planning every detail; he will file court appeals while defying court orders; he will pilfer taxpayer funds and even ignore the law and the Constitution--all just in his mission to leave a gilded tribute to himself. Off point But he can’t be bothered to lift a finger to bring down costs despite his promise to do so. Procedure · 5 words What does this all reveal? Procedure Positioning · 80 words It reveals that the President is uninterested in listening to what the American people want. Partly on point The American people don’t want the President to build a golden ballroom; they want him to build homes that they can afford. They are not asking for parades and car races on the National Mall; they want to pay less at the pump on their way to work. They don’t want his face on our currency; they want to keep more money in their pockets. Positioning Procedure · 15 words So, in closing, what does the final accounting of this President’s broken promises tell us? Procedure Claims · 31 words Since the President took office, Americans have had to pay $4,200 more to keep up with rising costs while the President spends $1.8 billion to keep up with his own ego.20 No reason given Positioning · 31 words In short, it tells us that the President seeks to rule but that he is unable to lead. He seeks to honor himself, Off point but he is unable to honor his word. Positioning Procedure · 13 words I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. GRAHAM). The Senator from Oregon. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×35 Positioning ×20 Procedure ×18 Partly on point ×9 Logical leap ×4 Unearned certainty ×3 Insult Motive imputed No reason given
Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “an apprentice dictator, who, rightly fearing that no one will ever honor his Presidency after he is gone, rushes to…”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 66
38 of 92 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “So now it is worth asking a simple question, one that the American people will ask their elected representatives when they return home in a few days:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The answer is clear:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “And let’s say we take everything all together--all the goods and services that we pay for every day--and add it all up.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “How much,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “if at all, did the President and his allies in Congress reduce costs?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “This isn’t a partisan point.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “This isn’t spin.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “So if the President failed to bring down costs, what has he been working on these last 2 years?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Well, the President’s been clear about his priorities.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “He is not interested in lowering costs for families.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “He is interested in raising monuments to honor himself.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Now, we throw lots of numbers around in Washington,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “but it is worth remembering what the American people know full well:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “We owe it to them to ask:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “How could that same $1.8 billion help them?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “$1.8 billion, it can buy a lot of things:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “So if I have one request today, it is this:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Is a ballroom to make one man feel like a King more important than healthcare for a year for the heroes who fought to keep our country free?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What more did America’s heroes--people who have given everything to this country--what more do they need to do to deserve the $1.8 billion that the President would rather spend to honor himself?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “And when in America did honoring service become less important than honoring one man’s ego?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but I think we are all doing a bit of play-acting if we forget that the President’s determination to shower himself in honors is not simply excessive or distractions but is wrong and is distinctly un-American.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Consider our other Presidents.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “What does this all reveal?” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It reveals that the President is uninterested in listening to what the American people want.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The American people don’t want the President to build a golden ballroom;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “they want him to build homes that they can afford.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They are not asking for parades and car races on the National Mall;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “they want to pay less at the pump on their way to work.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They don’t want his face on our currency;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “they want to keep more money in their pockets.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “So, in closing, what does the final accounting of this President’s broken promises tell us?” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “In short, it tells us that the President seeks to rule but that he is unable to lead.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “He seeks to honor himself,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but he is unable to honor his word.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield the floor.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “GRAHAM).” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The Senator from Oregon.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 56
44 of 92 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “2 years ago, the American people elected a new Congress and a new President.” This clause provides general background context about the election.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now, I don’t know if the President is right when he says that ``groceries’’ is an ``old-fashioned word,’’ as he often claims,” This clause is a commentary on a claim about word definition and does not relate to cost or the bill’s scope.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “So if the President failed to bring down costs, what has he been working on these last 2 years?” This clause transitions the topic from cost failure to the President’s priorities, which is a different subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Well, the President’s been clear about his priorities.” This clause serves as a transition to the President’s priorities.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He is not interested in lowering costs for families.” This clause comments on the President’s priorities, linking them to the failure to lower costs.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He is interested in raising monuments to honor himself.” This clause introduces a tangent about the President’s interest in monuments.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He hosted military parades in his honor.” This clause provides specific examples of the President’s self-glorification.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He destroyed the East Wing to build himself a golden ballroom.” This clause provides specific examples of the President’s self-glorification.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He has been trying to put his name on other monuments.” This clause provides specific examples of the President’s self-glorification.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He is running taxpayer-funded ad campaigns praising himself.” This clause provides specific examples of the President’s self-glorification.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And, according to a new report from the Joint Economic Committee Minority,” This clause attributes information to a specific minority committee report.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “while the American people are paying more to keep up with high costs, the President wants to spend $1.8 billion on projects to flatter his own vanity.” This clause mentions both rising costs and the President’s spending on vanity, addressing two related policy topics.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “How could that same $1.8 billion help them?” This clause poses a rhetorical question about how the specific spending could help Americans.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What can $1.8 billion buy when it is not being diverted by an apprentice dictator, who, rightly fearing that no one will ever honor his Presidency after he is gone, rushes to build gilded tributes to himself?” This clause contains inflammatory and partisan language that does not relate to the bill’s substance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It can pay for the electric bills for 12 million families for a month;” This clause discusses alternative uses of taxpayer money, which touches on the scope of assistance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “it can fill up more than 35 million tanks of gas, even at the President’s new high prices;” This clause discusses the cost of gas, but within the context of critiquing spending habits.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If the President insists on spending the people’s money on himself, he owes them an explanation.” This clause is a demand for an explanation regarding policy priorities.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I want the President to explain why a monument to honor himself is a better use of taxpayer dollars than paying for healthcare for veterans.” This clause demands an explanation tying the cost issue to alternative spending on healthcare.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Is a ballroom to make one man feel like a King more important than healthcare for a year for the heroes who fought to keep our country free?” This clause uses a rhetorical question to compare monuments versus healthcare.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What more did America’s heroes--people who have given everything to this country--what more do they need to do to deserve the $1.8 billion that the President would rather spend to honor himself?” This clause is a rhetorical question about deservedness.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And when in America did honoring service become less important than honoring one man’s ego?” This clause is a rhetorical question about historical values.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I know that a majority of Americans, including many of my Republican colleagues, also find the President’s vanity projects distasteful,” This clause refers to the views of other Americans and colleagues.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but I think we are all doing a bit of play-acting if we forget that the President’s determination to shower himself in honors is not simply excessive or distractions but is wrong and is distinctly un-American.” This clause offers a moral judgment on the President’s actions rather than a policy discussion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Consider our other Presidents.” This clause introduces a historical comparison of previous presidents.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “George Washington didn’t order the construction of the Washington Monument.” This clause provides a specific historical example.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson didn’t pick out sculptors to build their memorials.” This clause provides a specific historical example.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “John F.” This clause is incomplete historical reference.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Kennedy didn’t name the Kennedy Center.” This clause provides a specific historical example.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And none of them tried to put themselves on our currency.” This clause provides a specific historical example.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They received these honors from grateful citizens after their time in office.” This clause describes how historical figures received honors.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The current President is the only exception to this rule.” This clause singles out the current President as an exception to a historical trend.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “George Washington was a rich man as well,” This clause provides a historical detail about a specific person’s wealth.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but he used his wealth to support the Continental Army.” This clause describes how George Washington used his personal wealth.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He didn’t use his office to enrich himself,” This clause details how George Washington used his office.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “nor did he have any interest in being King.” This clause describes George Washington’s interest in being king.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The reason why this matters is because the President’s desire to appease his own vanity and his failure to bring down costs are linked because it is deeply telling that the President will go to such extravagant lengths to honor himself.” This clause attempts to connect the President’s vanity with the failure to lower costs.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He will break with American values and precedent when they stand in the way of his whims;” This clause predicts future actions that fall outside the scope of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “he will use a wrecking ball to tear down buildings;” This clause predicts future actions that fall outside the scope of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “he will spend great time and effort planning every detail;” This clause predicts future actions that fall outside the scope of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “he will file court appeals while defying court orders;” This clause predicts future actions that fall outside the scope of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “he will pilfer taxpayer funds and even ignore the law and the Constitution--all just in his mission to leave a gilded tribute to himself.” This clause predicts illegal actions that fall outside the scope of the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It reveals that the President is uninterested in listening to what the American people want.” This clause concludes that the President is uninterested in the American people’s desires.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In short, it tells us that the President seeks to rule but that he is unable to lead.” This clause offers a broad rhetorical conclusion about leadership quality.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He seeks to honor himself,” This clause is a rhetorical observation about the President’s behavior.
Reasoning · 67
5 of 92 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “but it is clear that on virtually every metric, it costs more to be an American than it did 2 years ago when this President was sworn in and the 119th Congress began.” Rising cost figures support failure to lower costs, but the claim that he never even tried is an outcome offered as proof of no effort, with no link stated.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “Since the President began his reckless war with Iran without a plan to win, the American people have paid an additional $93 billion on gas in less than a year,” Rising gas spending since the war began is offered as proof the war caused it, with no link stated between the war and the price rise.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “and instead, families had $4,200 more taken out of their pockets.” The figures support failure on costs, but that he did not try is inferred from the outcome with no link stated.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “and instead, families had $4,200 more taken out of their pockets.” Rising costs under his tenure are offered as proof of no effort, with no link stated between the outcome and the absence of action.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “Since the President took office, Americans have had to pay $4,200 more to keep up with rising costs while the President spends $1.8 billion to keep up with his own ego.” This is a plain report of two figures, not a conclusion requiring a reason.
Conclusions found · 9
Conclusion “No. Not only has the President failed to make good on his pledge to bring down costs, not only is it evident that he never even bothered to try,”
Because “but it is clear that on virtually every metric, it costs more to be an American than it did 2 years ago when this President was sworn in and the 119th Congress began.”
“But under this President and his majorities in Congress, gas prices haven’t just failed to go down, they have instead shot up to around $4.50 a gallon, meaning gas costs 50 percent more now than when Donald Trump entered office.”
Reason flawed Rising cost figures support failure to lower costs, but the claim that he never even tried is an outcome offered as proof of no effort, with no link stated.
Conclusion “but it is clear that on virtually every metric, it costs more to be an American than it did 2 years ago when this President was sworn in and the 119th Congress began.”
Because “But under this President and his majorities in Congress, gas prices haven’t just failed to go down, they have instead shot up to around $4.50 a gallon, meaning gas costs 50 percent more now than when Donald Trump entered office.”
“Instead, families now pay $611 a month.”
“Since the President took office, ground beef has risen to $7 a pound,”
“The American people have had to pay an additional $4,200 on goods and services since the President took office.”
Conclusion “But under this President and his majorities in Congress, gas prices haven’t just failed to go down, they have instead shot up to around $4.50 a gallon, meaning gas costs 50 percent more now than when Donald Trump entered office.”
Because Given in the same sentence
Conclusion “and, on average, each American family has had to spend $790 more on gas since this war began.”
Because “Since the President began his reckless war with Iran without a plan to win, the American people have paid an additional $93 billion on gas in less than a year,”
Reason flawed Rising gas spending since the war began is offered as proof the war caused it, with no link stated between the war and the price rise.
Conclusion “They failed to reduce costs at all.”
Because “The American people have had to pay an additional $4,200 on goods and services since the President took office.”
Conclusion “This is just basic mathematical facts--facts that make evident that the President both completely failed to lower costs and honestly didn’t even try.”
Because “The American people have had to pay an additional $4,200 on goods and services since the President took office.”
“and instead, families had $4,200 more taken out of their pockets.”
Reason flawed The figures support failure on costs, but that he did not try is inferred from the outcome with no link stated.
Conclusion “But he can’t be bothered to lift a finger to bring down costs despite his promise to do so.”
Because “and instead, families had $4,200 more taken out of their pockets.”
Reason flawed Rising costs under his tenure are offered as proof of no effort, with no link stated between the outcome and the absence of action.
Conclusion “Since the President took office, Americans have had to pay $4,200 more to keep up with rising costs while the President spends $1.8 billion to keep up with his own ego.”
Because No reason given
No reason given This is a plain report of two figures, not a conclusion requiring a reason.
Conclusion “In short, it tells us that the President seeks to rule but that he is unable to lead.”
Because “He hosted military parades in his honor.”
“He destroyed the East Wing to build himself a golden ballroom.”
“But he can’t be bothered to lift a finger to bring down costs despite his promise to do so.”
Respect · 92
2 of 92 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Insult An insult aimed at a person. What the tags mean → “an apprentice dictator, who, rightly fearing that no one will ever honor his Presidency after he is gone, rushes to build gilded tributes to himself” It labels the President a dictator and attributes fear and vanity to him rather than judging any act.
Motive imputed Claiming to know a person’s bad motives. What the tags mean → “the President’s desire to appease his own vanity” It attributes a self-serving state of mind to the President as fact.
Clarity · 97
3 of 92 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “The answer is clear” Asserts the conclusion through a certainty formula rather than pointing to any source or evidence.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “No. Not only has the President failed to make good on his pledge to bring down costs, not only is it evident that he never even bothered to try,” Presents a claim about the President’s effort as self-evident without offering anything a reader could check.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “know full well” Treats the point as shared knowledge of the American people instead of citing anything to back it.
Claims · 20
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “2 years ago, the American people elected a new Congress and a new President” In the 2024 US elections, Americans elected a new Congress and a new President. search
2 “on virtually every metric, it costs more to be an American than it did 2 years ago” Consumer costs across most metrics are higher in September 2026 than they were when the President took office and the 119th Congress began in 2024. search
3 “he promised that he would bring gas prices down from $3 a gallon to less than $2” Before taking office, Donald Trump promised to bring gas prices down from $3 a gallon to less than $2. search
4 “gas prices haven’t just failed to go down, they have instead shot up to around $4.50 a gallon, meaning gas costs 50 percent more now than when Donald Trump entered office” Gasoline in the US costs around $4.50 a gallon as of late September 2026, about 50 percent more than when Donald Trump entered office. search
5 “the American people have paid an additional $93 billion on gas in less than a year” Americans have paid an additional $93 billion on gas in less than a year since the war with Iran began. search
6 “each American family has had to spend $790 more on gas since this war began” The average American family has spent $790 more on gas since the war with Iran began. search
7 “Diesel now costs around $3 more a gallon than it did when the President took office” Diesel costs about $3 more per gallon in late 2026 than it did when the President took office in 2024. search
8 “costs at the pump exceeding $6.50 a gallon last week” Diesel pump prices exceeded $6.50 a gallon in the week before September 30, 2026. search
9 “the average monthly cost for health insurance was $468 a month” Just before the President took office, the average monthly cost of health insurance for families was $468. search
10 “families now pay $611 a month” Families now pay $611 a month for health insurance as of September 2026. search
11 “almost $150 more monthly, almost $2,000 more per year” Average monthly health insurance premiums have risen by almost $150 a month, almost $2,000 a year, since before the President took office. search
12 “ground beef has risen to $7 a pound” Ground beef costs $7 a pound as of September 2026. search
13 “coffee has risen from about $7 a pound to more than $9” Coffee prices have risen from about $7 a pound to more than $9 a pound since the President took office. search
14 “The American people have had to pay an additional $4,200 on goods and services since the President took office” Americans have paid an additional $4,200 on goods and services since the President took office in 2024. search
15 “He hosted military parades in his honor” The President hosted military parades in his own honor during his term. search
16 “He destroyed the East Wing to build himself a golden ballroom” The East Wing of the White House was demolished to build a ballroom during this presidency. search
17 “the President wants to spend $1.8 billion on projects to flatter his own vanity” A new Joint Economic Committee Minority report says the President wants to spend $1.8 billion on projects the report characterises as flattering himself. search
18 “George Washington didn’t order the construction of the Washington Monument” George Washington did not order the construction of the Washington Monument. search
19 “Kennedy didn’t name the Kennedy Center” John F. Kennedy did not name the Kennedy Center after himself. search
20 “Americans have had to pay $4,200 more to keep up with rising costs while the President spends $1.8 billion” The Senator claims Americans have paid $4,200 more in costs since the President took office while the President proposes spending $1.8 billion on vanity projects. search