The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down.
Average 88 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 6%Reasoning 24%Claims 67%The ask 3%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Procedure · 21 wordsI want to respond very briefly because everything that has just been said in objection to this bill is totally irrelevant.ProcedureReasoning · 28 wordsIt is irrelevant because it is based on the misunderstanding that this bill somehow imposes censorship or content evaluation.In fact, it is not a free speech issue.Claims · 84 wordsThe bill explicitly focuses on design features.Section 102(a) says a platform must exercise reasonable care in the ``creation and implementation of any design feature’’ when that design feature foreseeably contributes to one of the enumerated harms.1The bill even defines ``design feature’’ in section 101(4) as a platform feature or component that encourages or increases ``the frequency, time spent, 2or activity of minors on the . . . platform’’-- ``the frequency, time spent, or activity of minors on the . . . platform.’’Reasoning · 43 wordsIt couldn’t be clearer that we are talking here about the kind of design feature that is involved when a manufacturer makes a defective toaster or a car that goes off the road, or some other harm-causing feature that could be foreseeably corrected.Claims · 41 wordsAnd, finally, the bill specifically protects a child who goes looking for content.Section 102(b)(1) says the duty of care cannot be construed to require a platform to prevent a minor from ``deliberately and independently searching for, or specifically requesting, content.’’3Reasoning · 12 wordsIn short, the duty of care has nothing to do with censorship.Claims · 106 wordsIt says nothing about allowing government enforcement based on the viewpoint of users expressed through speech.And it preserves the First Amendment and everything that is involved in it.No reason givenI know my colleagues understand that America is in the midst of a mental health crisis.And one in four children ages 9 to 17 reports sexually explicit interaction with someone they believe was an adult online.4And 59 percent of U.S. teens report having experienced cyber bullying.5This problem will not go away in the next 30 days.It will only become more egregious and urgent.And so I regret that Senator Paul is objecting today, The ask · 12 wordsbut I am hoping that we will act quickly when we return.