← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity is 64. The grade is held to 48, 30 above Signal. 48 / 100, held down by Signal
Signal
18 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
50 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
88 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 70% Claims 18% Procedure 12%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. President, Positioning · 60 words well, for 2 years, Democrats fought fiercely to protect the interests of the American people while Senate Republicans fought tooth and nail to shield Donald Trump.1 We all knew how disastrous this President would be. Unearned certainty We set out to expose how Trump and his party were hurting the American people, and we would do everything we could to stop them. Positioning Vague promise Claims · 38 words We fought to lower the skyrocketing costs of Trump’s economy: Logical leap the cost of food, the cost of housing, the cost of energy, the cost of groceries, the cost of gasoline. Republicans pushed policies to drive those costs up. Positioning · 39 words We exposed Trump for his unprecedented corruption; Republicans aided and abetted his grifts every step of the way. No reason given We worked relentlessly to control Trump’s chaos that we see every day; Republicans encouraged him as he spiraled out of control. Positioning No reason given Procedure · 26 words Later today, I will talk more about how Senate Democrats have worked together to block the worst Trump’s GOP had to throw at the American people.2 Procedure Positioning · 47 words Now, of course, there is still a lot of work remaining to see America through the storm this administration has unleashed. But Senate Democrats are well positioned to stand up for the American people with the same devotion, cooperation, and discipline we showed these past 2 years. Positioning
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×11 No reason given ×2 Unearned certainty Vague promise Logical leap Procedure Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 18
12 of 17 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “well, for 2 years, Democrats fought fiercely to protect the interests of the American people while Senate Republicans fought tooth and nail to shield Donald Trump.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We all knew how disastrous this President would be.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We set out to expose how Trump and his party were hurting the American people,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and we would do everything we could to stop them.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We exposed Trump for his unprecedented corruption;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans aided and abetted his grifts every step of the way.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We worked relentlessly to control Trump’s chaos that we see every day;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans encouraged him as he spiraled out of control.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Later today, I will talk more about how Senate Democrats have worked together to block the worst Trump’s GOP had to throw at the American people.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Now, of course, there is still a lot of work remaining to see America through the storm this administration has unleashed.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “But Senate Democrats are well positioned to stand up for the American people with the same devotion, cooperation,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and discipline we showed these past 2 years.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 50
3 of 17 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “We fought to lower the skyrocketing costs of Trump’s economy:” Costs are said to be high under this economy, but no link is stated tying the rises to Republican policies.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “Republicans aided and abetted his grifts every step of the way.” That Democrats exposed corruption does not by itself show Republicans enabled it.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “Republicans encouraged him as he spiraled out of control.” The existence of daily chaos is asserted, but nothing links Republicans to encouraging it.
Conclusions found · 5
Conclusion “well, for 2 years, Democrats fought fiercely to protect the interests of the American people while Senate Republicans fought tooth and nail to shield Donald Trump.”
Because “We fought to lower the skyrocketing costs of Trump’s economy:”
“Republicans pushed policies to drive those costs up.”
“We exposed Trump for his unprecedented corruption;”
“Republicans aided and abetted his grifts every step of the way.”
“We worked relentlessly to control Trump’s chaos that we see every day;”
“Republicans encouraged him as he spiraled out of control.”
Conclusion “We set out to expose how Trump and his party were hurting the American people,”
Because “We fought to lower the skyrocketing costs of Trump’s economy:”
“Republicans pushed policies to drive those costs up.”
Conclusion “Republicans pushed policies to drive those costs up.”
Because “We fought to lower the skyrocketing costs of Trump’s economy:”
Reason flawed Costs are said to be high under this economy, but no link is stated tying the rises to Republican policies.
Conclusion “Republicans aided and abetted his grifts every step of the way.”
Because No reason given
No reason given That Democrats exposed corruption does not by itself show Republicans enabled it.
Conclusion “Republicans encouraged him as he spiraled out of control.”
Because No reason given
No reason given The existence of daily chaos is asserted, but nothing links Republicans to encouraging it.
Respect · 100
0 of 17 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 88
2 of 17 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We all knew” Asserts shared foreknowledge in place of any source or evidence.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we would do everything we could to stop them” A commitment with no specific action, measure, or success condition.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “for 2 years, Democrats fought fiercely to protect the interests of the American people” Senate Democrats spent the two years before September 2026 opposing the Trump administration. search 2 “Later today, I will talk more about how Senate Democrats have worked together” Schumer said he would give a later speech that day about Senate Democrats’ work opposing the Trump administration’s agenda. search
