The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 97 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 12%Claims 78%The ask 9%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam President, Procedure · 28 wordsas the Senate considers the Protect College Sports Act, I believe we must clarify its proposed application of the Sports Broadcasting Act to a new collegiate collective entity.ProcedureClaims · 175 wordsIt is important to make clear that the Protect College Sports Act would expand the Sports Broadcasting Act only with respect to the entities which may be covered by the antitrust exemption in selling telecast rights--in this case, the new covered intercollegiate entity.1The legislation expands only the eligible entities selling telecast rights under the SBA, not the scope of the exemption itself.The bill would not modify the scope of the underlying Sports Broadcasting Act’s allowance of the collective sale or transfer of media rights to entities beyond those that will make games available via ``sponsored telecasting.’’2As a result, the new collegiate entity is only covered by the antitrust exemption in negotiations with media partners that provide games to the public via broadcast, rather than exclusive streaming arrangements.3The bill would not modify the scope of activities protected by the underlying SBA and nothing in title II of the legislation should be construed as doing so.4The intent of this legislation is to increase fans’ access to college sports on free, over-the-air broadcasting.The ask · 21 wordsI encourage universities and conferences to work with local and national broadcasters to make certain college sports are accessible to all.