Procedure 5% Claims 67% Aside 1% Reasoning 12% Positioning 6% The ask 8%
Structure · 32 steps
Claims · 12
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. President, Procedure · 13 words reserving the right to object, let me remind us all, colleagues, that we, Procedure Claims · 10 words as of today, are 41 days from the midterm elections; 1 Aside · 16 words or, as I like to refer to it, it is simply the last day to vote, Aside Claims · 54 words because a lot of people in States across the country take advantage of their right and opportunity to vote early, in person, like people in Virginia did beginning this last weekend.2 Many people in States across the country, including in my home State of California, exercised their right and option to vote by mail. Partly on point Procedure · 9 words I will get back to that in a minute. Procedure Claims · 121 words The point is, in a growing number of States, the midterm election is already underway. People in North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Alabama are already receiving their ballots in the mail.3 In Virginia, South Dakota, Minnesota, Vermont, and Illinois, voters are already going to the polls to vote in person early. In the next couple of weeks, additional States will begin. Nine more States will have begun their early voting. In my home State of California, ballots will be mailed to every registered voter in the State.4 So, again, the bottom line here is the 2026 midterm election has already begun; it is in full swing. Partly on point So let’s not be fooled about this attempt to pass a piece of the SAVE Act. Procedure · 4 words No. 1, the substance. Procedure Claims · 66 words It is not just a voter ID bill. It is a bill-- and the timing is curious--that seeks to create chaos and confusion over vote-by-mail and absentee voting. The other part is, indeed, the timing and its implications, trying to change the rules--because this bill, if signed into law, would go immediately into effect, creating chaos in the middle of an election that is already underway. Procedure · 8 words But don’t just take my word for it. Procedure Claims · 22 words Let me quote the Republican Lieutenant Governor of Utah, who says that this is ``violating our constitutional right to a secret ballot.’’5 Reasoning · 27 words Why? Because the requirement to include a copy of your driver’s license when you are voting by mail undermines the notion of a secret ballot in America. Claims · 28 words Let me quote the Republican Governor of Ohio, who says that a very similar bill that reached his desk in the State of Ohio represented ``a significant burden.’’6 Reasoning · 53 words And, again, it is not just a potential or theoretical significant burden for some election sometime in the future. It would go into effect immediately, causing chaos and confusion and a burden for election administrators, who wouldn’t even know how to begin to comply with this for an election that is already underway. Claims · 90 words Let me go even further and reference the Supreme Court’s recent actions when they blocked President Trump’s Executive order on vote-by- mail and what he was trying to do, giving authority and direction to the U.S. Postal Service to determine which voters get their ballots and which don’t.7 Even Justice Kavanaugh, with whom I disagree on much--but even Justice Kavanaugh--said it was in part because changing the rules so close to an election ``would be arbitrary and capricious.’’8 That was a couple of weeks ago that this ruling came out. Reasoning · 41 words If at that time the Supreme Court deemed it too close to an election, we are even closer now. And so, again, there is not nearly the time to properly, responsibly implement it, even if you agreed with this bad policy. Procedure · 21 words Let me make a case for what is really going on here, all this talk about changing the rules around elections. Procedure Claims · 59 words This administration, including the President himself, has been trying nonstop to interfere and change the rules on the elections for a long time now, and those efforts have been successfully pushed back. I expect him to continue these threats and attempts--not just between now and election day-- probably on election day and postelection day, if history is any indicator. Reasoning · 20 words Why? Partly on point First of all, it is a desperate attempt to hold onto power because the writing is on the wall. Claims · 23 words In poll after poll, approval ratings, et cetera, show that Donald Trump is going to be in for a rough night this November. Off point No reason given Positioning · 27 words But it is also an attempt to distract. Partly on point You would think that he--or we--could be spending more time on trying to bring down costs for working families. Positioning Logical leap Claims · 192 words But, no, for a number of reasons, including but not limited to the unauthorized war in Iran, the price on everything is not just not going down; it keeps going up--the price of gas that people put into their passenger cars to get to and from work or wherever they need to go. The cost of diesel is also at record levels and being passed on to consumers in terms of increased costs on everything else-- groceries, clothing, consumer electronics, and more. The threat to the economy is so bad that the Federal Reserve has not only not lowered interest rates as Donald Trump has practically demanded; they have taken a recent step to increase interest rates for the first time in 3 years to try to rein in inflation.9 So nothing is getting cheaper, nothing is getting easier, and a recent report showed that the administration’s tariffs--again, the war in Iran; the trade wars that are unnecessary; and bad economic decisions--are taking a toll on American families: $4,200 per household in increased costs because of higher prices.10 And now the President has, once again, threatened our Canadian neighbors with endless tariffs. Procedure · 3 words Look at healthcare. Procedure Claims · 15 words The average cost of employer-provided healthcare is expected to increase by at least 11 percent.11 Positioning · 10 words What happened to the so-called ``Liberation Day’’ of last April?12 Positioning Claims · 26 words President Trump promised that these tariffs would bring back manufacturing, make Americans more wealthy, pay down the Nation’s debt, create jobs, and lower prices for consumers. Off point Positioning · 4 words That sure sounded good, Positioning Claims · 67 words but it couldn’t be further from the truth. None of that has happened. Actually, the exact opposite has come to bear. Off point No reason given But, again, instead of focusing on those issues, we are once again taking precious time on the Senate floor and talking about unnecessary changes to how people should be able to vote or not vote--maybe that is their ultimate objective--for an election that is already underway. Positioning · 28 words Just because your team is losing at halftime doesn’t mean you can call a timeout and change the rules or change the referees, trying to change the outcome. Positioning The ask · 15 words So let’s dispense with this measure and get back to the real work at hand. Mr. President, The ask · 77 words I would therefore ask the Senator to modify his request so that instead of S. No reason given 5271 and notwithstanding rule XXII, the Committee on Finance be discharged from further consideration of S. 5390, the End Trump’s Tariff Tax Act and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration; further, that the bill be considered read a third time and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×23 Partly on point ×16 Procedure ×6 Positioning ×5 No reason given ×3 Aside Logical leap
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 84
12 of 55 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “reserving the right to object, let me remind us all, colleagues, that we,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “or, as I like to refer to it, it is simply the last day to vote,” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I will get back to that in a minute.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “No. 1, the substance.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “But don’t just take my word for it.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Let me make a case for what is really going on here, all this talk about changing the rules around elections.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “But it is also an attempt to distract.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “You would think that he--or we--could be spending more time on trying to bring down costs for working families.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Look at healthcare.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What happened to the so-called ``Liberation Day’’ of last April?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That sure sounded good,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Just because your team is losing at halftime doesn’t mean you can call a timeout and change the rules or change the referees, trying to change the outcome.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 56
39 of 55 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “as of today, are 41 days from the midterm elections;” About the countdown to the midterm election, not what the bill does.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “or, as I like to refer to it, it is simply the last day to vote,” About election day and early voting habits, not the bill’s content.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “because a lot of people in States across the country take advantage of their right and opportunity to vote early, in person, like people in Virginia did beginning this last weekend.” About early in-person voting in various States, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Many people in States across the country, including in my home State of California, exercised their right and option to vote by mail.” About vote-by-mail practices in various States, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The point is, in a growing number of States, the midterm election is already underway.” States that the election is underway, which is context for the timing argument but not what the bill does.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “People in North Carolina, Wisconsin,” Lists States mailing ballots, not addressed to the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and Alabama are already receiving their ballots in the mail.” More State-by-State early voting detail, not the bill’s content.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “In Virginia, South Dakota, Minnesota, Vermont,” Lists States with early in-person voting, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and Illinois, voters are already going to the polls to vote in person early.” More State-by-State early voting detail, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “In the next couple of weeks, additional States will begin.” About the schedule of early voting beginning in more States, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Nine more States will have begun their early voting.” Counts States starting early voting, not addressed to the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “In my home State of California, ballots will be mailed to every registered voter in the State.” About California’s mail ballot distribution, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “So, again, the bottom line here is the 2026 midterm election has already begun;” States the election has already begun, which frames the timing argument but does not address the bill’s substance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “it is in full swing.” Restates that the election is in full swing, not what the bill does.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Why?” Raises the question of motives behind the election-rule changes, not what the bill does.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “First of all, it is a desperate attempt to hold onto power because the writing is on the wall.” About a supposed attempt to hold onto power, not the bill’s content or effects.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In poll after poll, approval ratings, et cetera, show that Donald Trump is going to be in for a rough night this November.” About the President’s approval ratings and the November election, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “But it is also an attempt to distract.” Characterizes the measure as a distraction without addressing what the bill does.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You would think that he--or we--could be spending more time on trying to bring down costs for working families.” About costs for working families, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But, no, for a number of reasons, including but not limited to the unauthorized war in Iran, the price on everything is not just not going down;” About the war in Iran and rising prices, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “it keeps going up--the price of gas that people put into their passenger cars to get to and from work or wherever they need to go.” About the price of gasoline, not addressed to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The cost of diesel is also at record levels and being passed on to consumers in terms of increased costs on everything else-- groceries, clothing, consumer electronics,” About diesel costs and consumer prices, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and more.” Continues the list of consumer costs, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The threat to the economy is so bad that the Federal Reserve has not only not lowered interest rates as Donald Trump has practically demanded;” About Federal Reserve interest rates, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “they have taken a recent step to increase interest rates for the first time in 3 years to try to rein in inflation.” About interest rates and inflation, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “So nothing is getting cheaper, nothing is getting easier,” General remarks about prices and living costs, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and a recent report showed that the administration’s tariffs--again, the war in Iran;” About tariffs, the war in Iran and trade wars, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “the trade wars that are unnecessary;” About trade wars, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and bad economic decisions--are taking a toll on American families:” About economic decisions and their toll on families, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “$4,200 per household in increased costs because of higher prices.” A figure on household cost increases, a subject outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And now the President has, once again, threatened our Canadian neighbors with endless tariffs.” About tariff threats against Canada, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Look at healthcare.” Turns to healthcare costs, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The average cost of employer-provided healthcare is expected to increase by at least 11 percent.” About employer-provided healthcare cost increases, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What happened to the so-called ``Liberation Day’’ of last April?” About the President’s tariff promises, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “President Trump promised that these tariffs would bring back manufacturing, make Americans more wealthy, pay down the Nation’s debt, create jobs,” About tariff promises on manufacturing and jobs, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and lower prices for consumers.” Continues the tariff promises list, a subject outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but it couldn’t be further from the truth.” Assessment of the tariff promises, not addressed to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “None of that has happened.” About the failure of tariff promises, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Actually, the exact opposite has come to bear.” About economic outcomes of tariffs, not the bill.
Reasoning · 68
4 of 55 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “In poll after poll, approval ratings, et cetera, show that Donald Trump is going to be in for a rough night this November.” The claim is stated as its own support, with no poll figures or sources given.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “You would think that he--or we--could be spending more time on trying to bring down costs for working families.” Economic troubles plus the bill’s timing are offered as proof of a distracting motive without any link.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “Actually, the exact opposite has come to bear.” The promise is quoted, but ‘the exact opposite’ is asserted without supporting facts.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “I would therefore ask the Senator to modify his request so that instead of S.” The request itself is stated without any supporting reason in the statement.
Conclusions found · 11
Conclusion “So, again, the bottom line here is the 2026 midterm election has already begun;”
Because “People in North Carolina, Wisconsin,”
“and Alabama are already receiving their ballots in the mail.”
“In Virginia, South Dakota, Minnesota, Vermont,”
“and Illinois, voters are already going to the polls to vote in person early.”
“In the next couple of weeks, additional States will begin.”
“Nine more States will have begun their early voting.”
“In my home State of California, ballots will be mailed to every registered voter in the State.”
Conclusion “It is a bill-- and the timing is curious--that seeks to create chaos and confusion over vote-by-mail and absentee voting.”
Because “Let me quote the Republican Lieutenant Governor of Utah, who says that this is ``violating our constitutional right to a secret ballot.’’”
“Because the requirement to include a copy of your driver’s license when you are voting by mail undermines the notion of a secret ballot in America.”
“Let me quote the Republican Governor of Ohio, who says that a very similar bill that reached his desk in the State of Ohio represented ``a significant burden.’’”
Conclusion “if signed into law, would go immediately into effect, creating chaos in the middle of an election that is already underway.”
Because “It would go into effect immediately, causing chaos and confusion and a burden for election administrators, who wouldn’t even know how to begin to comply with this for an election that is already underway.”
“So, again, the bottom line here is the 2026 midterm election has already begun;”
Conclusion “And so, again, there is not nearly the time to properly, responsibly implement it, even if you agreed with this bad policy.”
Because “Let me go even further and reference the Supreme Court’s recent actions when they blocked President Trump’s Executive order on vote-by- mail and what he was trying to do, giving authority and direction to the U.S. Postal Service to determine which voters get their ballots and which don’t.”
“Even Justice Kavanaugh, with whom I disagree on much--but even Justice Kavanaugh--said it was in part because changing the rules so close to an election ``would be arbitrary and capricious.’’”
“If at that time the Supreme Court deemed it too close to an election, we are even closer now.”
Conclusion “and those efforts have been successfully pushed back.”
Because “Let me go even further and reference the Supreme Court’s recent actions when they blocked President Trump’s Executive order on vote-by- mail and what he was trying to do, giving authority and direction to the U.S. Postal Service to determine which voters get their ballots and which don’t.”
Conclusion “In poll after poll, approval ratings, et cetera, show that Donald Trump is going to be in for a rough night this November.”
Because No reason given
No reason given The claim is stated as its own support, with no poll figures or sources given.
Conclusion “But it is also an attempt to distract.”
Because “You would think that he--or we--could be spending more time on trying to bring down costs for working families.”
“But, no, for a number of reasons, including but not limited to the unauthorized war in Iran, the price on everything is not just not going down;”
“The threat to the economy is so bad that the Federal Reserve has not only not lowered interest rates as Donald Trump has practically demanded;”
“$4,200 per household in increased costs because of higher prices.”
Reason flawed Economic troubles plus the bill’s timing are offered as proof of a distracting motive without any link.
Conclusion “$4,200 per household in increased costs because of higher prices.”
Because “and a recent report showed that the administration’s tariffs--again, the war in Iran;”
“and bad economic decisions--are taking a toll on American families:”
Conclusion “Actually, the exact opposite has come to bear.”
Because No reason given
No reason given The promise is quoted, but ‘the exact opposite’ is asserted without supporting facts.
Conclusion “So let’s dispense with this measure and get back to the real work at hand.”
Because “if signed into law, would go immediately into effect, creating chaos in the middle of an election that is already underway.”
“It would go into effect immediately, causing chaos and confusion and a burden for election administrators, who wouldn’t even know how to begin to comply with this for an election that is already underway.”
“If at that time the Supreme Court deemed it too close to an election, we are even closer now.”
“And so, again, there is not nearly the time to properly, responsibly implement it, even if you agreed with this bad policy.”
Conclusion “I would therefore ask the Senator to modify his request so that instead of S.”
Because No reason given
No reason given The request itself is stated without any supporting reason in the statement.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
0 of 55 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 12
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “as of today, are 41 days from the midterm elections; ” As of September 23, 2026, there are 41 days until the US midterm elections. search 2 “people in Virginia did beginning this last weekend” Early in-person voting in Virginia began the weekend before September 23, 2026. search 3 “and Alabama are already receiving their ballots in the mail.” As of September 23, 2026, absentee ballots were being mailed to voters in North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Alabama. search 4 “In my home State of California, ballots will be mailed to every registered voter in the State” California mails ballots to every registered voter for elections. search 5 “the Republican Lieutenant Governor of Utah, who says that this is ``violating our constitutional right to a secret ballot.’’” Utah’s Republican Lieutenant Governor said the bill was ‘violating our constitutional right to a secret ballot.’ search 6 “the Republican Governor of Ohio, who says that a very similar bill that reached his desk in the State of Ohio represented ``a significant burden.’’” Ohio’s Republican Governor described a similar bill as ‘a significant burden.’ search 7 “the Supreme Court’s recent actions when they blocked President Trump’s Executive order on vote-by- mail” The Supreme Court recently blocked President Trump’s executive order concerning vote-by-mail. search 8 “Even Justice Kavanaugh, with whom I disagree on much--but even Justice Kavanaugh--said it was in part because changing the rules so close to an election ``would be arbitrary and capricious.’’” Justice Kavanaugh wrote that changing election rules close to an election ‘would be arbitrary and capricious.’ search 9 “they have taken a recent step to increase interest rates for the first time in 3 years” The Federal Reserve recently raised interest rates for the first time in 3 years. search 10 “$4,200 per household in increased costs because of higher prices” A recent report estimated tariffs and other factors cost American households $4,200 per household in increased costs. search 11 “The average cost of employer-provided healthcare is expected to increase by at least 11 percent” Employer-provided healthcare costs are projected to rise by at least 11 percent. search 12 “the so-called ``Liberation Day’’ of last April” President Trump announced his ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs in April 2025. search
