Analysis · Floor speech · beta

Maria Cantwell

Democrat on Legislative Session 2026-09-17

147 words · 9 sentences · 12 clauses

Statement grade

A–

Average 88 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 7%Claims 93%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Procedure · 5 wordsI am asking a question.Procedure Claims · 57 wordsI would respectfully say to my colleague, without the $2.8 billion record revenue-sharing agreement in what is called Grant House v.¹ NCAA, there would not be revenue sharing. The Court has not recognized revenue sharing.² If you read the decision by Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh said Congress can decide these are not employees and they do not deserve revenue.³ Procedure · 6 wordsKavanaugh’s decision on NIL basically says: ProcedureClaims · 79 wordsCongress, you can come back and say they don’t deserve a damn thing. A settlement agreement by injured athletes basically got that right, but that settlement agreement is tedious and could fall apart.Vague promise Our recognizing that money and recognizing the revenue-sharing rights is a historic first. So I don’t know if you understand that $2.8 billion on behalf of athletes won in a settlement agreement is not a permanent right, ⁴but it will be after we pass this law.Vague promise

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 92

2 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I am asking a question.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “Kavanaugh’s decision on NIL basically says:”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · no score

Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 85

2 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “could fall apart”No actor, condition, or measure is given for how or when the settlement might fail.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “it will be after we pass this law”No date or conditions for passing the law are stated, leaving the commitment unverifiable.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“$2.8 billion record revenue-sharing agreement in what is called Grant House v.”The Grant House v. NCAA case produced a $2.8 billion revenue-sharing agreement for college athletes.search
2“The Court has not recognized revenue sharing.”A court has not recognized revenue sharing as a right for college athletes.search
3“Kavanaugh said Congress can decide these are not employees and they do not deserve revenue.”In a judicial decision, Justice Kavanaugh said Congress can decide that college athletes are not employees and do not deserve revenue.search
4“$2.8 billion on behalf of athletes won in a settlement agreement”Athletes won $2.8 billion in a settlement agreement.search

Analyzed on 2026-10-17