← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Reasoning and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down.
Average 63 / 100
Signal
33 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
45 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Reasoning
77 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
98 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 2% Positioning 44% Claims 29% Procedure 6% Anecdote 13% The question 3% The ask 2%
Structure · 15 steps
Claims · 9
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 10 words I thank the gentlewoman, Michelle Fischbach, for her leadership here. Thanks Positioning · 83 words Wow, we have heard gaslighting on this floor before, but here, somehow or another, pardons have anything to do with fighting fraud? That is the excuse to not help us fight fraud, which, of course, nothing was done before. Unearned certainty By the way, Mr. Speaker, I don’t recall hearing about Hunter Biden and others receiving pardons from their father, 1 and also pardons given to those who weren’t even accused of crimes but could be one day. I don’t remember any of that being raised. Positioning Off point Claims · 57 words I rise in support of this rule, which would allow the House to consider two important pieces of legislation that improve the Federal Government’s ability to combat taxpayer fraud. You would think that this would be something that would be bipartisan, combating taxpayer fraud, which is in excess of $254 billion that we have uncovered so far.2 Positioning · 35 words If we have to do it on our own, we will, Mr. Speaker, False choice because that is what we are about. We are about straightening things out, correcting all the wrongs, particularly the last 4 years. Positioning Off point Procedure · 23 words This is a big part of it. The Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has uncovered, 3 as I said, $245 billion in taxpayer fraud.4 Procedure Claims · 7 words We have seen it in Los Angeles. Anecdote · 55 words I heard this morning in a CMS meeting that the level of hospice fraud that existed was in the multibillions.5 By the way, the 900 or so hospices that were shut down, not one of them called to complain that they were being shut down, that they couldn’t serve their so-called providers anymore.6 Guess what. Anecdote Positioning · 60 words This is under the jurisdiction of Democrat leadership that this is all occurring. Nothing was done on fraud for 4 years during the Biden administration, during the Pelosi reign, during the time when these gentlemen and others had the gavels. What kind of nonsense is this? We are calling on pardons as a reason not to be going after fraud? Positioning Off point Claims · 24 words By the way, I have constituents having fraud committed on them. We have fraud in Philadelphia.7 We have fraud in Minneapolis, the learning center.8 The question · 13 words Has anybody come out on the other side and denounced that, Mr. Speaker? Positioning · 3 words This is outrageous. Positioning Off point Claims · 33 words My Republican colleagues and I have been fighting taxpayer fraud as a top priority. We have introduced legislation to establish an overpayment czar to help State-level fraud prevention.9 We have supported commonsense reform. Mr. Speaker, The ask · 8 words I urge my colleagues to support this rule.
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×15 Off point ×14 Procedure ×3 Anecdote ×3 Thanks Unearned certainty False choice
Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 33
22 of 38 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I thank the gentlewoman, Michelle Fischbach, for her leadership here.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Wow, we have heard gaslighting on this floor before,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but here, somehow or another, pardons have anything to do with fighting fraud?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is the excuse to not help us fight fraud,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “which, of course, nothing was done before.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “By the way, Mr. Speaker, I don’t recall hearing about Hunter Biden and others receiving pardons from their father,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and also pardons given to those who weren’t even accused of crimes but could be one day.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I don’t remember any of that being raised.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “If we have to do it on our own, we will, Mr. Speaker,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “because that is what we are about.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are about straightening things out, correcting all the wrongs, particularly the last 4 years.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “This is a big part of it.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has uncovered,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “as I said, $245 billion in taxpayer fraud.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “I heard this morning in a CMS meeting that the level of hospice fraud that existed was in the multibillions.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “By the way, the 900 or so hospices that were shut down, not one of them called to complain that they were being shut down, that they couldn’t serve their so-called providers anymore.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “Guess what.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is under the jurisdiction of Democrat leadership that this is all occurring.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Nothing was done on fraud for 4 years during the Biden administration, during the Pelosi reign, during the time when these gentlemen and others had the gavels.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What kind of nonsense is this?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are calling on pardons as a reason not to be going after fraud?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is outrageous.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 45
14 of 38 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Wow, we have heard gaslighting on this floor before,” Accuses the other side of gaslighting instead of addressing the rule or the fraud bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but here, somehow or another, pardons have anything to do with fighting fraud?” Discusses pardons as a debating point rather than the legislation under consideration.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is the excuse to not help us fight fraud,” Attacks the other side’s excuse rather than the bill’s purpose or effects.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which, of course, nothing was done before.” Repeats an accusation that the other side did nothing, in place of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “By the way, Mr. Speaker, I don’t recall hearing about Hunter Biden and others receiving pardons from their father,” Raises Hunter Biden pardons, a different subject from the rule or fraud bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and also pardons given to those who weren’t even accused of crimes but could be one day.” Continues the pardons topic, unrelated to the legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I don’t remember any of that being raised.” Continues the pardons complaint rather than the bills being considered.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are about straightening things out, correcting all the wrongs, particularly the last 4 years.” Substitutes the other side’s record for the bill being considered.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is under the jurisdiction of Democrat leadership that this is all occurring.” Blames Democrat leadership rather than addressing the rule or the fraud bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Nothing was done on fraud for 4 years during the Biden administration, during the Pelosi reign, during the time when these gentlemen and others had the gavels.” Attacks the prior administration’s record instead of the bill’s merits.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What kind of nonsense is this?” Rhetorical attack on the opposition, not the legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are calling on pardons as a reason not to be going after fraud?” Returns to the pardons argument rather than the rule or bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Has anybody come out on the other side and denounced that, Mr. Speaker?” Demands the other side denounce fraud, a political point in place of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is outrageous.” Expresses outrage at the opposition rather than addressing the legislation.
Reasoning · 77
1 of 38 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
False choice Two options presented as if they were the only ones. What the tags mean → “If we have to do it on our own, we will, Mr. Speaker,” Clause c12 frames bipartisan support as expected but c14 presents only two options, bipartisan action or going it alone, after asserting without support that the other side will not join.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “I urge my colleagues to support this rule.”
Because “I rise in support of this rule,”
“which would allow the House to consider two important pieces of legislation that improve the Federal Government’s ability to combat taxpayer fraud.”
“My Republican colleagues and I have been fighting taxpayer fraud as a top priority.”
“We have introduced legislation to establish an overpayment czar to help State-level fraud prevention.”
Conclusion “If we have to do it on our own, we will, Mr. Speaker,”
Because “You would think that this would be something that would be bipartisan, combating taxpayer fraud,”
“which is in excess of $254 billion that we have uncovered so far.”
“because that is what we are about.”
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 98
1 of 38 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “nothing was done before” An absolute claim about inaction asserted with no source or evidence.
Claims · 9
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Hunter Biden and others receiving pardons from their father” Joe Biden issued pardons to Hunter Biden and others. search
2 “in excess of $254 billion that we have uncovered so far” The Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has uncovered in excess of $254 billion in taxpayer fraud. search
3 “The Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has uncovered,” A Task Force to Eliminate Fraud exists and has made findings about taxpayer fraud. search
4 “$245 billion in taxpayer fraud” The Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has uncovered $245 billion in taxpayer fraud. search
5 “the level of hospice fraud that existed was in the multibillions” At a CMS meeting the morning of September 15, 2026, the speaker heard that hospice fraud was in the multibillions of dollars. search
6 “the 900 or so hospices that were shut down” About 900 hospices have been shut down. search
7 “We have fraud in Philadelphia.” There is fraud occurring in Philadelphia. search
8 “fraud in Minneapolis, the learning center” There is fraud connected to a learning center in Minneapolis. search
9 “legislation to establish an overpayment czar” Republican members have introduced legislation to establish an overpayment czar to help State-level fraud prevention. search