Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Val T. Hoyle

212 words · 12 sentences · 15 clauses

Statement grade
A
Average 91 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 16%Claims 51%Reasoning 21%Thanks 10%The ask 2%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 9 wordsI yield myself such time as I may consume.Procedure Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 16 wordsI rise in strong support of H.R. 6021, the Archie Cavanaugh Migratory Bird Treaty Clarification Act.1Procedure Claims · 108 wordsFor over a century, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 has played an important role in protecting migratory birds across North America, 2but due to the rigid way the law is interpreted, a few Alaska Native artisans who use bird parts in their traditional arts and regalia have been criminalized for their craft. This legislation addresses the conflict. H.R. 6021 would direct the Department of the Interior and the State Department to work with Japan to clarify their Migratory Bird Treaty with the United States.3 It would make clear that authentic Alaska Native handicrafts made or sold with nonedible migratory bird parts are exempt from Federal law.4 Reasoning · 44 wordsThis language ensures that while we will continue to have strong protections against wasteful harvesting and illegal poaching of birds, we are not doing so at the expense of Alaska Native traditions. This bill respects Tribal sovereignty, protects traditional knowledge, and maintains conservation integrity. Thanks · 22 wordsI thank Representative Begich and Chair Westerman for working constructively across the aisle to come to an agreement we can all support.Thanks Mr. Speaker, The ask · 5 wordsI urge a ``yes’’ vote, Procedure · 8 wordsand I reserve the balance of my time.Procedure

Analyzed on