Analysis · Floor speech · beta

Cynthia M. Lummis

Republican on Unanimous Consent Request--S. 5389 (Executive Calendar) 2026-09-14

92 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

Average 92 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 64%Aside 3%Procedure 8%Promise 25%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. President, Claims · 59 wordsbriefly, in response to the gentleman who just spoke, the digital asset bill we are voting on tomorrow, the Clarity Act, gives the Democrats exactly what they asked for on an ethics deal. It requires the President to divest or use a blind trust, disclosure of sales, a ban on promoting your own coin, ¹and State AG enforcement power.² Aside · 3 wordsTake the win.Aside Mr. President, Procedure · 7 wordsI would like to conclude my remarks.Procedure Promise · 23 wordsWe will talk Clarity tomorrow, and I would like to move into closing the Senate for today and making announcements about tomorrow’s schedule.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 88

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

A remark off to the side of the point.What the tags mean “Take the win.”An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I would like to conclude my remarks.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Reasoning · 87

0 of 2 deductions are Reasoning

Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.

Nothing lost points.

Conclusions found · 1

Conclusion“Take the win.”

Because“briefly, in response to the gentleman who just spoke, the digital asset bill we are voting on tomorrow, the Clarity Act, gives the Democrats exactly what they asked for on an ethics deal.”

“It requires the President to divest or use a blind trust, disclosure of sales, a ban on promoting your own coin,”

“and State AG enforcement power.”

Reason given

Respect · no score

Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“It requires the President to divest or use a blind trust, disclosure of sales, a ban on promoting your own coin”The Clarity Act requires the President to divest digital assets or place them in a blind trust, requires disclosure of sales, and bans promoting one’s own coin.search
2“State AG enforcement power”The Clarity Act gives state attorneys general enforcement power.search

Analyzed on 2026-09-16