The average of Signal, Relevance, Reasoning and Clarity.
Average 89 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 4%Claims 79%Positioning 9%Reasoning 8%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 9 wordsI yield myself such time as I may consume.ProcedureMr. Speaker, Claims · 187 wordsthe voter ID provisions in this bill amend the Help America Vote Act to require States to obtain a photo ID from an individual to vote in person in a Federal election or to require a copy of the photo ID to be submitted with a ballot cast other than in person.1These requirements do not apply to an absent uniformed services voter or an individual provided the right to vote other than in person by the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act.2The bill permits voters to use several different forms of photo ID: a valid State-issued motor vehicle driver’s license that includes a photo of the individual and an expiration date, a valid State-issued identification card that includes a photo of the individual and an expiration date issued by a State motor vehicle authority, a valid United States passport for the individual, a valid photo identification card for the individual issued by the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs, 3or a valid identification document issued by a Tribal government that includes a photo of the individual and an expiration date.4Positioning · 26 wordsWhile my friends across the aisle claim the bill will prevent individuals who cannot afford a photo ID from voting, this is nothing but false alarmism.PositioningUnearned certaintyClaims · 25 wordsThe Supreme Court has held photo ID laws are constitutional only where the State provides a photo ID to those who do not have them.5Logical leapReasoning · 28 wordsIn other words, a photo ID requirement in the bill is not a barrier to voting for someone who cannot afford to pay the typical photo ID fee.Positioning · 16 wordsThe data supports that Democrats are being disingenuous when they claim this bill would suppress voting.PositioningClaims · 137 wordsThe nonpartisan National Bureau of Economic Research tracked 1.6 billion data points over an 8-year period.6This massive amount of data confirms strict voter ID laws have no statistically measurable negative impact on voter participation.7This comprehensive, multiyear study found zero negative impact on overall registration or turnout, no drops in participation among minority or young voters, 8and an increase in Hispanic participation in some ID law States.9Photo ID as a form of verification is a part of American life.Americans must show an ID to participate in a wide range of everyday activities, including boarding a plane, entering government buildings, cashing their checks, buying a gun, and enjoying Olive Garden’s Never Ending Pasta Bowl.Politico just announced that more than 6,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in New Jersey and have been voting since 2023.10Reasoning · 9 wordsThis is clearly an issue which must be addressed.Off pointUnearned certaintyMr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsI reserve the balance of my time.Procedure