Claims 67% Positioning 5% Procedure 1% Thanks 26% The ask 1%
Structure · 20 steps
Claims · 12
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 36 words each year over 3.6 million babies are born in the United States.1 In the past, virtually every placenta and umbilical cord was tossed as medical waste. Today, doctors have turned this medical waste into medical miracles. Positioning · 38 words Not only has God, in his infinite wisdom and goodness, created a placenta and an umbilical cord to nurture and protect the precious life of an unborn child, but now we know another gift awaits immediately after birth. Positioning Procedure · 6 words Something very special is left behind: Procedure Claims · 10 words umbilical cord blood that is teeming with life-saving stem cells. Off point Mr. Speaker, Claims · 94 words today the House will vote to reauthorize the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, a law that I authored 21 years ago.2 That law created a new nationwide umbilical cord blood stem cell program designed to collect, type, and cryogenically freeze cord blood units for transplantation into patients to mitigate and cure serious disease. The law also provided that cord blood stem cells be used for research. The new cord blood program was combined with an expanded bone marrow initiative, crafted over several years by our distinguished former colleague, Congressman Bill Young. Mr. Speaker, Claims · 35 words umbilical cord blood stem cells obtained after the birth of a child have proven to be highly efficacious in treating over 75 diseases, including lymphoma, leukemia, sickle cell disease, 3 and other metabolic and immune deficiencies. Thanks · 67 words I thank Dr. Joanne Kurtzberg of Duke University, an internationally renowned expert in pediatric hematology, oncology, and umbilical cord blood banking and transplantation. Dr. Kurtzberg helped draft our original law 26 years ago.4 It took 5 long years to enact it into law.5 It was blocked at many turns, Hidden agency but she was right there from the beginning and continues to be an extraordinary pioneer in the field. Thanks Off point Claims · 86 words Earlier today, I called Dr. Kurtzberg--we do talk a lot--and she said cord blood has been used as a donor for transplant, enabling over 50,000 patients with cancer, blood disease, 6 and other genetic conditions to have a life-saving treatment. Cord blood is also used as starting material for manufacturing immune effector cells, like CAR T cells, and others to treat patients with cancer and autoimmune diseases. She said there is exciting research now using cord blood to treat children with cerebral palsy, birth asphyxia, and autism. Mr. Speaker, Claims · 107 words the National Cord Blood Inventory--created by the original law and continued in this reauthorization--provides funding to public cord blood banks participating in the program to allow them to expand the national inventory of cord blood units that are available for transplant.7 These units are then listed on the registry by the National Marrow Donor Program.8 The funds appropriated thus far have led to an important increase in the use of these units. The registry now has approximately 121,000 available units.9 The program registry allows patients and physicians to locate matching cord blood units, as well as adult donors, for both marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplants. Mr. Speaker, Claims · 103 words the program registry allows patients and physicians to locate matching cord blood units, as well as adult a donors, for marrow and peripheral blood stem cells. The program is the world’s largest, most diverse donor registry, with more than 43 million potential marrow donors around the world.10 To date, NMDP, through its operation of the program, has facilitated over 150,000 transplants.11 The bill before us today, Mr. Speaker, authorizes $280 million for these programs over 5 years--$115 million for cord blood, $165 million for bone marrow programs--to ensure that thousands of present and future patients benefit from this extraordinary field of regenerative medicine.12 Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 121 words I am deeply grateful to Chairman Guthrie for his amazing support and leadership in advancing the bill. I want to thank others, including my friend Frank Pallone; Doris Matsui, who is the prime Democrat cosponsor; Mr. Bilirakis, one of the originals and a great supporter; Ms. Pingree; Ms. Tenney; Mr. Mfume; and others. We have others, but they were the originals. I also want to thank some of my staff, including Rebecca West, Evan Heitman, John McDonough, who worked overtime--as you know, so many details to be attended to--and, of course, the Staff Director Megan Jackson; Emma Schultheis; and Jackie Weinrich, who worked on the Democrat side in helping to get this to the floor. I thank them all so much. Thanks Off point Mr. Speaker, Claims · 4 words this will save lives, Unearned certainty The ask · 6 words and I urge support for it.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×30 Thanks ×21 Positioning ×2 Procedure Hidden agency Unearned certainty
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 64
24 of 56 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Not only has God, in his infinite wisdom and goodness, created a placenta and an umbilical cord to nurture and protect the precious life of an unborn child,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but now we know another gift awaits immediately after birth.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Something very special is left behind:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I thank Dr. Joanne Kurtzberg of Duke University, an internationally renowned expert in pediatric hematology, oncology,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “and umbilical cord blood banking and transplantation.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Dr. Kurtzberg helped draft our original law 26 years ago.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “It took 5 long years to enact it into law.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “It was blocked at many turns,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “but she was right there from the beginning and continues to be an extraordinary pioneer in the field.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I am deeply grateful to Chairman Guthrie for his amazing support and leadership in advancing the bill.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I want to thank others, including my friend Frank Pallone;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Doris Matsui, who is the prime Democrat cosponsor;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Mr. Bilirakis, one of the originals and a great supporter;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Ms. Pingree;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Ms. Tenney;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Mr. Mfume;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “and others.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “We have others,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “but they were the originals.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I also want to thank some of my staff, including Rebecca West, Evan Heitman, John McDonough, who worked overtime--as you know,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “so many details to be attended to--and, of course, the Staff Director Megan Jackson;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Emma Schultheis;” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “and Jackie Weinrich, who worked on the Democrat side in helping to get this to the floor.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I thank them all so much.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 74
30 of 56 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “each year over 3.6 million babies are born in the United States.” General birth statistics with no tie to the reauthorization bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In the past, virtually every placenta and umbilical cord was tossed as medical waste.” Historical aside about discarded placentas, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Today, doctors have turned this medical waste into medical miracles.” General rhetorical claim unrelated to the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Not only has God, in his infinite wisdom and goodness, created a placenta and an umbilical cord to nurture and protect the precious life of an unborn child,” Religious reflection on the placenta, not the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but now we know another gift awaits immediately after birth.” Continues the aside about a gift after birth, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Something very special is left behind:” Suspense-building aside rather than discussion of the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “umbilical cord blood that is teeming with life-saving stem cells.” General description of cord blood, not the reauthorization.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “umbilical cord blood stem cells obtained after the birth of a child have proven to be highly efficacious in treating over 75 diseases, including lymphoma, leukemia, sickle cell disease,” General efficacy claims about cord blood rather than the bill’s programs or funding.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and other metabolic and immune deficiencies.” Continues the list of diseases treated, not the bill itself.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I thank Dr. Joanne Kurtzberg of Duke University, an internationally renowned expert in pediatric hematology, oncology,” Personal thanks to an expert, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and umbilical cord blood banking and transplantation.” Continues the tribute to Dr. Kurtzberg.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Dr. Kurtzberg helped draft our original law 26 years ago.” Personal history of drafting the original law, not the bill before the House.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It took 5 long years to enact it into law.” Historical anecdote about the original law’s enactment.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It was blocked at many turns,” Historical anecdote about the original law’s enactment.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but she was right there from the beginning and continues to be an extraordinary pioneer in the field.” Continued personal tribute to Dr. Kurtzberg.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am deeply grateful to Chairman Guthrie for his amazing support and leadership in advancing the bill.” Personal thanks to a chairman, not the bill’s content.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I want to thank others, including my friend Frank Pallone;” Personal thanks to a colleague.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Doris Matsui, who is the prime Democrat cosponsor;” Personal thanks to a cosponsor.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Mr. Bilirakis, one of the originals and a great supporter;” Personal thanks to a colleague.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Ms. Pingree;” Personal thanks to a colleague.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Ms. Tenney;” Personal thanks to a colleague.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Mr. Mfume;” Personal thanks to a colleague.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and others.” Personal thanks to colleagues.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have others,” Aside about additional cosponsors.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but they were the originals.” Aside about cosponsors.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I also want to thank some of my staff, including Rebecca West, Evan Heitman, John McDonough, who worked overtime--as you know,” Personal thanks to staff members.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so many details to be attended to--and, of course, the Staff Director Megan Jackson;” Personal thanks to staff members.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Emma Schultheis;” Personal thanks to a staff member.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and Jackie Weinrich, who worked on the Democrat side in helping to get this to the floor.” Personal thanks to a staff member.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I thank them all so much.” Closing thanks unrelated to the bill’s content.
Reasoning · 93
0 of 56 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Nothing lost points.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “this will save lives,”
Because “umbilical cord blood stem cells obtained after the birth of a child have proven to be highly efficacious in treating over 75 diseases, including lymphoma, leukemia, sickle cell disease,”
“Earlier today, I called Dr. Kurtzberg--we do talk a lot--and she said cord blood has been used as a donor for transplant, enabling over 50,000 patients with cancer, blood disease,”
“and other genetic conditions to have a life-saving treatment.”
“The funds appropriated thus far have led to an important increase in the use of these units.”
“To date, NMDP, through its operation of the program, has facilitated over 150,000 transplants.”
Conclusion “and I urge support for it.”
Because “the National Cord Blood Inventory--created by the original law and continued in this reauthorization--provides funding to public cord blood banks participating in the program to allow them to expand the national inventory of cord blood units that are available for transplant.”
“The bill before us today, Mr. Speaker, authorizes $280 million for these programs over 5 years--$115 million for cord blood, $165 million for bone marrow programs--to ensure that thousands of present and future patients benefit from this extraordinary field of regenerative medicine.”
“this will save lives,”
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 99
2 of 56 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Hidden agency Wording that hides who did something, or who will. What the tags mean → “It was blocked at many turns” The passive names no actor responsible for blocking the law.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “this will save lives” A flat prediction of future benefit offered with no evidence or condition.
Claims · 12
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “each year over 3.6 million babies are born in the United States” Over 3.6 million babies are born in the United States each year. search
2 “reauthorize the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, a law that I authored 21 years ago” Christopher H. Smith authored the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005, which the House is voting to reauthorize. search
3 “highly efficacious in treating over 75 diseases” Umbilical cord blood stem cells have been used to treat over 75 diseases. search
4 “Dr. Kurtzberg helped draft our original law 26 years ago” Dr. Joanne Kurtzberg of Duke University helped draft the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005. search
5 “It took 5 long years to enact it into law” The Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act took 5 years from drafting to enactment into law. search
6 “cord blood has been used as a donor for transplant, enabling over 50,000 patients” Cord blood has been used in transplants enabling over 50,000 patients with cancer, blood disease, and other genetic conditions to receive life-saving treatment. search
7 “the National Cord Blood Inventory--created by the original law” The National Cord Blood Inventory was created by the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005. search
8 “These units are then listed on the registry by the National Marrow Donor Program” Cord blood units in the National Cord Blood Inventory are listed on the registry by the National Marrow Donor Program. search
9 “The registry now has approximately 121,000 available units” The cord blood registry currently has approximately 121,000 available units. search
10 “more than 43 million potential marrow donors around the world” The program is the world’s largest and most diverse donor registry, with more than 43 million potential marrow donors worldwide. search
11 “NMDP, through its operation of the program, has facilitated over 150,000 transplants” The National Marrow Donor Program has facilitated over 150,000 transplants through its operation of the program. search
12 “authorizes $280 million for these programs over 5 years--$115 million for cord blood, $165 million for bone marrow programs” The bill authorizes $280 million over 5 years, comprising $115 million for cord blood and $165 million for bone marrow programs. search