← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Reasoning and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down.
Average 94 / 100
Signal
84 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Reasoning
93 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 8% Claims 60% Reasoning 21% Positioning 7% The ask 4%
Structure · 8 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 16 words I rise today in support of my legislation, H.R. 1703, the Choices for Increased Mobility Act. Procedure Claims · 94 words This important piece of legislation clarifies the payment rules for manual wheelchairs under Medicare part B.1 The bill allows Medicare patients the choice to decide whether a titanium or a carbon-fiber wheelchair is right for them, giving patients the option to pay out of pocket for wheelchair upgrades if that is their choice.2 To restore this choice for Medicare patients, this bill creates two new wheelchair codes and enables upgrades within existing codes.3 Importantly, this will remove barriers to patients, allowing the patient to access the upgraded benefit at no additional cost to CMS.4 Reasoning · 40 words We must remove obstacles that prevent patients from taking full advantage of their Medicare benefits and give them the freedom to choose the equipment that is right for the patient, a decision that has profound impacts on their individual lives. Claims · 22 words This bipartisan legislation will remove the barrier that has impeded access to lightweight wheelchair options for individuals with mobility impairments since 2016.5 Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 14 words I am proud to see this important bill come to the House floor today, Positioning The ask · 8 words and I urge my colleagues to support it.
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×2 Positioning
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 84
3 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I rise today in support of my legislation, H.R.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “1703, the Choices for Increased Mobility Act.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I am proud to see this important bill come to the House floor today,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Nothing lost points.
Reasoning · 93
0 of 3 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Nothing lost points.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “We must remove obstacles that prevent patients from taking full advantage of their Medicare benefits and give them the freedom to choose the equipment that is right for the patient, a decision that has profound impacts on their individual lives.”
Because “The bill allows Medicare patients the choice to decide whether a titanium or a carbon-fiber wheelchair is right for them, giving patients the option to pay out of pocket for wheelchair upgrades if that is their choice.”
“To restore this choice for Medicare patients, this bill creates two new wheelchair codes and enables upgrades within existing codes.”
“Importantly, this will remove barriers to patients, allowing the patient to access the upgraded benefit at no additional cost to CMS.”
Conclusion “and I urge my colleagues to support it.”
Because “This important piece of legislation clarifies the payment rules for manual wheelchairs under Medicare part B.”
“The bill allows Medicare patients the choice to decide whether a titanium or a carbon-fiber wheelchair is right for them, giving patients the option to pay out of pocket for wheelchair upgrades if that is their choice.”
“To restore this choice for Medicare patients, this bill creates two new wheelchair codes and enables upgrades within existing codes.”
“Importantly, this will remove barriers to patients, allowing the patient to access the upgraded benefit at no additional cost to CMS.”
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “clarifies the payment rules for manual wheelchairs under Medicare part B” H.R. 1703, the Choices for Increased Mobility Act, clarifies Medicare Part B payment rules for manual wheelchairs. search
2 “The bill allows Medicare patients the choice to decide whether a titanium or a carbon-fiber wheelchair is right for them, giving patients the option to pay out of pocket for wheelchair upgrades if that is their choice.” The bill allows Medicare patients to pay out of pocket for titanium or carbon-fiber wheelchair upgrades. search
3 “creates two new wheelchair codes and enables upgrades within existing codes” The bill requires CMS to create at least two new Medicare billing codes for manual wheelchair bases and enables upgrades within existing codes. search
4 “no additional cost to CMS” Under the bill, suppliers receive the same Medicare payment as otherwise applies, so the change imposes no additional cost to CMS. search
5 “impeded access to lightweight wheelchair options for individuals with mobility impairments since 2016” A Medicare policy barrier has impeded access to lightweight wheelchair options for individuals with mobility impairments since 2016. search