← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Reasoning and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down. Average 69 / 100
Signal
77 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
56 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Reasoning
60 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
82 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 3% Claims 73% Positioning 17% Reasoning 5% The ask 1%
Structure · 17 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Procedure · 9 words I yield myself such time as I may consume. Procedure Claims · 49 words In listening to the chairman today and at the Rules Committee several weeks ago, it is clear to me that he has been picking his words very carefully. Off point He has been very specific that this bill, the so-called Take Care of America’s Veterans Act, would not impair current veterans. Positioning · 35 words I am not sure if the chairman fully understands how the disability benefits system works or if he truly believes what he is saying, but what he is saying isn’t even remotely the full truth. Positioning Off point Unearned certainty Claims · 53 words The bill can and will lead to cuts for those who already have service-connected disability ratings for sleep apnea and tinnitus. This is because anytime a veteran applies for a rating increase or applies for a new rating for some other condition, VA can and does review previous ratings, sometimes even lowering them.1 Reasoning · 23 words It is foolish to think that VA won’t apply the new rules for sleep apnea and tinnitus when veterans have their ratings reviewed. Unearned certainty Positioning · 14 words Further, his remarks fail to take into consideration two other critically important populations here. Positioning Claims · 47 words First, these cuts would make servicemembers currently serving who may be incurring these injuries right now ineligible to receive compensation for service-connected tinnitus or sleep apnea. Those servicemembers President Trump keeps sending into harm’s way in this foolish war with Iran would be ineligible for these benefits.2 Positioning · 6 words That should give us all pause. Positioning Claims · 96 words Let me just say a ``yes’’ vote on this bill is a message that we are sending to the servicemembers currently serving in and around the waters of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz and our servicemembers that are stationed at bases who have already faced incoming missile fire and have been subjected to the blasts that have surely affected their eardrums, we are saying to them that they will not be able to apply to make claims based on tinnitus, much less sleep apnea.3 That is the message a ``yes’’ vote will send to them. Off point The ask · 7 words That is why I say vote ``no.’’ Claims · 84 words In addition, the chairman and his colleagues fail to acknowledge that the existing veterans who have yet to file a claim for tinnitus or sleep apnea--I am talking about a group of people not the current servicemembers, but veterans who have yet to apply for a rating--these two groups of veterans, that is, current servicemembers and veterans who have yet to file, will be treated worse than those that came before them. This contract will unilaterally be changed on them and for the worse. Hidden agency Positioning · 19 words How my Republican colleagues are okay with treating two veterans with the same exact condition differently is beyond me. Positioning Mr. Speaker, Claims · 29 words this is the largest cut to veterans’ disability benefits in history being used to pay for this bill when Republicans are not demanding offsets for $95 billion next week.4 5 No reason given Unearned certainty Positioning · 10 words I don’t know how you all can live with yourselves. Positioning Off point Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 words I reserve the balance of my time. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×8 Positioning ×6 Unearned certainty ×3 Procedure ×2 Hidden agency No reason given
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 77
8 of 21 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield myself such time as I may consume.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I am not sure if the chairman fully understands how the disability benefits system works or if he truly believes what he is saying,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but what he is saying isn’t even remotely the full truth.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Further, his remarks fail to take into consideration two other critically important populations here.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That should give us all pause.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “How my Republican colleagues are okay with treating two veterans with the same exact condition differently is beyond me.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I don’t know how you all can live with yourselves.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I reserve the balance of my time.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 56
8 of 21 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In listening to the chairman today and at the Rules Committee several weeks ago, it is clear to me that he has been picking his words very carefully.” Commentary on the chairman’s word choice rather than the bill’s content.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am not sure if the chairman fully understands how the disability benefits system works or if he truly believes what he is saying,” Speculation about the chairman’s understanding and beliefs, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but what he is saying isn’t even remotely the full truth.” A personal accusation about the chairman’s truthfulness in place of a claim about the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Those servicemembers President Trump keeps sending into harm’s way in this foolish war with Iran would be ineligible for these benefits.” An attack on the war with Iran rather than the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That should give us all pause.” A rhetorical aside that makes no point about the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let me just say a ``yes’’ vote on this bill is a message that we are sending to the servicemembers currently serving in and around the waters of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz and our servicemembers that are stationed at bases who have already faced incoming missile fire and have been subjected to the blasts that have surely affected their eardrums, we are saying to them that they will not be able to apply to make claims based on tinnitus, much less sleep apnea.” A political appeal about the Iran war and vote messaging rather than the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is the message a ``yes’’ vote will send to them.” A repetition of the vote-messaging point, not a claim about the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I don’t know how you all can live with yourselves.” A personal jab at colleagues that does not address the bill.
Reasoning · 60
1 of 21 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “this is the largest cut to veterans’ disability benefits in history being used to pay for this bill when Republicans are not demanding offsets for $95 billion next week.” The comparison to other spending and the offset claim are asserted here without any supporting figures or clauses elsewhere in the statement.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “That is why I say vote ``no.’’”
Because “The bill can and will lead to cuts for those who already have service-connected disability ratings for sleep apnea and tinnitus.”
“This is because anytime a veteran applies for a rating increase or applies for a new rating for some other condition, VA can and does review previous ratings, sometimes even lowering them.”
“First, these cuts would make servicemembers currently serving who may be incurring these injuries right now ineligible to receive compensation for service-connected tinnitus or sleep apnea.”
“but veterans who have yet to apply for a rating--these two groups of veterans, that is, current servicemembers and veterans who have yet to file, will be treated worse than those that came before them.”
Conclusion “this is the largest cut to veterans’ disability benefits in history being used to pay for this bill when Republicans are not demanding offsets for $95 billion next week.”
Because No reason given
No reason given The comparison to other spending and the offset claim are asserted here without any supporting figures or clauses elsewhere in the statement.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 82
4 of 21 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “isn’t even remotely the full truth” Asserts a verdict on the chairman’s statement with no source or evidence offered in the clause itself.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “It is foolish to think that VA won’t apply the new rules” Asserts as certain how VA will act in future reviews without citing a rule, memo, or source.
Hidden agency Wording that hides who did something, or who will. What the tags mean → “This contract will unilaterally be changed on them” A passive construction that names no actor for the change being described.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “the largest cut to veterans’ disability benefits in history” A sweeping superlative asserted without any source or figure to support it.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “anytime a veteran applies for a rating increase or applies for a new rating for some other condition, VA can and does review previous ratings, sometimes even lowering them” When a veteran applies for a rating increase or a new rating for another condition, the VA can and does review previous disability ratings, sometimes lowering them. search 2 “servicemembers President Trump keeps sending into harm’s way in this foolish war with Iran” As of July 2026, US servicemembers are deployed in harm’s way in an armed conflict with Iran under President Trump. search 3 “our servicemembers that are stationed at bases who have already faced incoming missile fire” US servicemembers stationed at certain bases have already faced incoming missile fire as of July 2026. search 4 “this is the largest cut to veterans’ disability benefits in history” The Take Care of America’s Veterans Act would be the largest cut to veterans’ disability benefits in US history. search 5 “$95 billion next week” Republicans are not demanding offsets for $95 billion in spending scheduled for the following week. search
