← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance and Clarity is 72. The grade is held to 46, 30 above Signal. 46 / 100, held down by Signal
Signal
16 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 48% Thanks 36% Claims 16%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 31 words I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Buchanan), the original sponsor of the bill here in the House of Representatives and my good friend.1 Procedure Thanks · 23 words I thank the gentleman for his persistency all these years, along with the former Senator Rubio, who is now our Secretary of State.2 Thanks Claims · 10 words This has always been a priority for both of them.
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×2 Thanks Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 16
3 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Florida (Mr.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Buchanan), the original sponsor of the bill here in the House of Representatives and my good friend.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I thank the gentleman for his persistency all these years, along with the former Senator Rubio, who is now our Secretary of State.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Nothing lost points.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the original sponsor of the bill here in the House of Representatives” Mr. Buchanan was the original sponsor of the Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 in the House of Representatives. search 2 “the former Senator Rubio, who is now our Secretary of State” Marco Rubio, formerly a U.S. Senator, is currently the U.S. Secretary of State. search
