← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance and Clarity is 54. The grade is held to 34, 30 above Relevance.
34 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
62 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
4 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
97 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 5% Positioning 29% Claims 17% Promise 37% Reasoning 6% The ask 5%
Structure · 16 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 8 words I yield myself the balance of my time. Procedure Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 89 words this debate has made one thing very clear. Republicans are not the victims of this chaos. They are the perpetrators of this chaos. There is only one party that controls this floor and all three branches of government.1 Republicans set the agenda. Republicans write these awful rules. Republicans control the schedule, and Republicans have chosen to spend week after week fighting with one another while regular working people are getting squeezed. News flash to my Republican colleagues: The American people know the difference between working and pretending to work. Positioning Claims · 67 words They know that passing the same voter suppression bill again and again will not lower their rent. They know that stapling the SAVE Act onto yet another piece of legislation will not bring down the price of groceries.2 They know that threatening the VFW will not improve veterans’ care. They know that changing or not changing the clocks will not change what is in their bank account. Off point Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 15 words if Democrats were in the majority, we would begin every day with one simple question: Procedure Promise · 148 words How do we make life more affordable for working people in this country? We would work to build more housing. We would work to lower rents and stop giant Wall Street firms from bidding families out of the market. We would take on corporate consolidation and price gouging that are driving up the cost of food. We would lower health insurance premiums and prescription drug prices instead of ripping coverage away to pay for more billionaire tax breaks. We would make childcare more affordable. We would lower utility bills and end these stupid tariff taxes that show up in the price of nearly everything that people buy. In addition, we would stay here and we would keep working until the job was done. Now, I am not saying that every problem would be solved overnight, but we would put real solutions on this floor. We would allow debate. Claims · 34 words I mean, we don’t debate anything anymore. Most of the bills that come to this floor are completely closed, where nobody can offer an amendment, take it or leave it. I mean, you know, Promise · 64 words and when something did not pass, we would keep trying. We would keep trying until we got it right, until we helped people in this country. I mean, that is our job. That’s what we are supposed to do. When it comes to veterans, Democrats would fund the benefits that these veterans earned. We would not pit one generation of disabled veterans against another, Positioning · 69 words and that is what my Republican colleagues are doing. It is really not only frustrating; it is unconscionable. That should not be a partisan statement, by the way, in terms of helping our veterans. That is basic decency. The American people deserve a Congress that is focused on affordability, not on Donald Trump’s long list of petty grievances and attempts to rehash old conspiracy theories from 6 years ago. Positioning Reasoning · 35 words They deserve a majority that understands that power is not about controlling the floor. It is about using the floor to help people, to improve the quality of life for the people that we represent. Positioning · 12 words Republicans have had their chance. They blew it. They have wasted it. Positioning Off point The ask · 29 words I urge my colleagues, vote ``no’’ on the previous question. Vote ``no’’ on this rule. Let us end the chaos and get back to work for the American people. Off point Vague promise Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 8 words I yield back the balance of my time. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×47 Positioning ×19 Procedure ×3 Vague promise
Off topic Only 4% of this speech directly addressed the bill under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 62
22 of 70 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield myself the balance of my time.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “this debate has made one thing very clear.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans are not the victims of this chaos.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They are the perpetrators of this chaos.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “There is only one party that controls this floor and all three branches of government.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans set the agenda.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans write these awful rules.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans control the schedule,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and Republicans have chosen to spend week after week fighting with one another while regular working people are getting squeezed.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “News flash to my Republican colleagues:” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The American people know the difference between working and pretending to work.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “if Democrats were in the majority, we would begin every day with one simple question:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and that is what my Republican colleagues are doing.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is really not only frustrating;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “it is unconscionable.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That should not be a partisan statement, by the way, in terms of helping our veterans.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is basic decency.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The American people deserve a Congress that is focused on affordability, not on Donald Trump’s long list of petty grievances and attempts to rehash old conspiracy theories from 6 years ago.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans have had their chance.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They blew it.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They have wasted it.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield back the balance of my time.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 4
47 of 70 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans are not the victims of this chaos.” An attack on the majority’s conduct rather than any point about the rule or the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They are the perpetrators of this chaos.” A partisan accusation substituting for discussion of the measures under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There is only one party that controls this floor and all three branches of government.” About party control of government, not the rule or the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans set the agenda.” About agenda-setting, not the measures before the House.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans write these awful rules.” General complaint about rules-writing, not this rule.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans control the schedule,” About scheduling control, not the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and Republicans have chosen to spend week after week fighting with one another while regular working people are getting squeezed.” Political broadside about infighting instead of the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “News flash to my Republican colleagues:” A rhetorical jab, not engagement with the rule or bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The American people know the difference between working and pretending to work.” Insult to colleagues in place of addressing the measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They know that passing the same voter suppression bill again and again will not lower their rent.” Attack on a voter suppression bill not before the House here.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They know that stapling the SAVE Act onto yet another piece of legislation will not bring down the price of groceries.” About the SAVE Act, unrelated to the pending rule or bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They know that threatening the VFW will not improve veterans’ care.” About veterans’ care disputes, not the measures under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They know that changing or not changing the clocks will not change what is in their bank account.” Uses the clock bill only to make an affordability point rather than address the bill itself.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “if Democrats were in the majority, we would begin every day with one simple question:” Hypothetical Democratic agenda, not the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “How do we make life more affordable for working people in this country?” States an affordability focus unrelated to the rule or bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would work to build more housing.” Housing plank of a counter-agenda, not the measures at hand.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would work to lower rents and stop giant Wall Street firms from bidding families out of the market.” Rent and housing policy, not the bills under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would take on corporate consolidation and price gouging that are driving up the cost of food.” Food prices and consolidation, unrelated to the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would lower health insurance premiums and prescription drug prices instead of ripping coverage away to pay for more billionaire tax breaks.” Health care and tax policy, not the rule or bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would make childcare more affordable.” Childcare affordability, unrelated to the measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would lower utility bills and end these stupid tariff taxes that show up in the price of nearly everything that people buy.” Utilities and tariffs, not the bills before the House.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In addition, we would stay here and we would keep working until the job was done.” About work ethic in general, not the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now, I am not saying that every problem would be solved overnight,” Continues the counter-agenda, not the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but we would put real solutions on this floor.” About putting alternative solutions forward, not this rule or these bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would allow debate.” General complaint about debate practices, not this rule’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I mean, we don’t debate anything anymore.” General complaint, not engagement with the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Most of the bills that come to this floor are completely closed,” About closed procedures generally, not the terms of this rule.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “where nobody can offer an amendment, take it or leave it.” General amendment-process complaint, not this rule.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I mean, you know,” A verbal aside.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and when something did not pass, we would keep trying.” General persistence theme, not the measures at hand.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would keep trying until we got it right, until we helped people in this country.” Counter-agenda rhetoric, not the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I mean, that is our job.” General statement about the job, not the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That’s what we are supposed to do.” General statement about duty, not the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “When it comes to veterans, Democrats would fund the benefits that these veterans earned.” Veterans benefits policy, unrelated to the rule or bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We would not pit one generation of disabled veterans against another,” Veterans policy attack, not the measures under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and that is what my Republican colleagues are doing.” Attack on colleagues’ veterans policy, not the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is really not only frustrating;” Expresses frustration, not a point on the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “it is unconscionable.” Characterization of the veterans dispute, not the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That should not be a partisan statement, by the way, in terms of helping our veterans.” About the partisan framing of the veterans point, not the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is basic decency.” General decency remark, not engagement with the measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The American people deserve a Congress that is focused on affordability, not on Donald Trump’s long list of petty grievances and attempts to rehash old conspiracy theories from 6 years ago.” Attack on the majority’s focus and the President, not the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They deserve a majority that understands that power is not about controlling the floor.” About use of power generally, not the pending measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is about using the floor to help people, to improve the quality of life for the people that we represent.” General statement about the floor’s purpose, not the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans have had their chance.” Political judgment on the majority’s record, not the measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They blew it.” Partisan point, not engagement with the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They have wasted it.” Partisan point, not engagement with the bills.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let us end the chaos and get back to work for the American people.” A closing slogan about chaos rather than the substance of the measures.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 97
1 of 70 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “get back to work for the American people” Calls for action with no specific step, actor, or measure of success.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “one party that controls this floor and all three branches of government” As of July 2026, Republicans control the House floor agenda and hold the presidency and both chambers of Congress, giving them control of all three branches of the federal government. search
2 “stapling the SAVE Act onto yet another piece of legislation” The SAVE Act has been attached as a provision to another piece of legislation being considered by the House. search