← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance and Clarity is 43. The grade is held to 31, 30 above Relevance.
31 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
34 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
1 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
93 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 4% Positioning 60% Claims 36%
Structure · 20 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 9 words I yield myself such time as I may consume. Procedure Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 115 words the American people need to take note of the amount of rhetorical smog emanating from the other side of the Chamber, because it is obscene. Our Democratic colleagues continue to weave together an entirely disingenuous and deceptive narrative that Democrats are the ones standing at the forefront of the conversation when it comes to supporting our Nation’s veterans. That has never been the case and will never be the case. Unearned certainty If Democrats truly cared enough about veterans, they would spend their time supporting Chairman Bost’s bill and not coming up with hack job, so-called solutions that do nothing to reform the VA and deliver high-quality care and service to those who have served this Nation. Positioning Off point Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 34 words it is sad that our colleagues across the aisle have chosen this position. It is sad that they can gin up misleading narratives and hawk them around like someone delivering newspapers on a bike. Positioning Claims · 29 words The bill before us ensures that combat-disabled servicemembers who were medically retired through no fault of their own receive the benefits they earned while maintaining equity across retiree populations.1 Positioning · 61 words This is what happens when personalities of the day and political gamesmanship subvert actual legislating, like what Chairman Bost and Republicans have been doing the entire time. The former doesn’t deliver for veterans. It treats them like second-class citizens. Their solution is spending more money while delivering fewer outcomes. Wow, color us shocked. It is a story as old as time. Positioning Claims · 47 words Instead, the bill before us today would reduce net direct spending by approximately $1.3 billion over the next 10 years.2 Off point In an era of growing deficits and debt, H.R. 9237 demonstrates that Congress can advance significant veterans’ priorities while remaining fiscally responsible and reducing overall Federal spending. Positioning · 37 words Republicans are focused on targeted relief. This is targeted relief that focuses on combat-disabled veterans, includes additional fairness safeguards, and does not throw money at a problem with the meager hope of things fixing themselves by osmosis. Positioning Claims · 119 words Let’s run through what else you will not find in the cobbled- together, so-called solutions that Democrats are throwing their weight behind. You won’t find a unified Democratic effort to reform the VA’s outdated construction and leasing processes that delay the opening of clinics and facilities across the country. In Chairman Bost’s bill, Republicans are doing just that. You won’t find the Democratic commitment to ensure that veterans can continue to access the mental health care support services in the communities where they live nationwide. In Chairman Bost’s bill, it is there. You won’t find Democratic solutions to slash government bureaucracy that hinders veterans from accessing the care they deserve and earned. In Chairman Bost’s bill, they are there. Off point Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 51 words that is the difference here. All Democrats see is another government program to funnel money into without any commitment whatsoever to improving the lives of those the program serves. They will contort the language they use and the policy gimmicks they cook up to mislead people and organizations into believing mistruths. Positioning Claims · 31 words VSOs, the purpose-driven organizations that are dedicated to advocating for veterans, have been led to believe that Republicans somehow want to rob veterans of their benefits, but that is entirely untrue. Positioning · 68 words As is evidenced by President Trump’s efforts, the efforts of Secretary Collins at the VA, and the veteran-driven legislation here in Congress, Republicans see veterans and meet them where they are. Republicans see and understand the problems that veterans face every day and want to ensure that the VA is nimble, responsive, and rightsized so that veterans are not left in the dark and to fend for themselves. Positioning Procedure · 14 words Here is a final little nugget that I will leave you with, Mr. Speaker: Procedure Claims · 26 words The majority of our Republican members on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee are indeed veterans.3 There is only one Democrat on that committee who is a veteran.4 Positioning · 56 words I trust veterans to know and understand what veterans need and deserve. People are actually attuned to issues veterans face as opposed to those who simply haven’t the slightest clue. Unearned certainty Republicans are the ones with actual solutions here. Unearned certainty We are not bloviating like so many have chosen to do. We are fighting for veterans, Mr. Speaker. Positioning Off point Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 words I reserve the balance of my time. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×45 Positioning ×29 Procedure ×3 Unearned certainty ×3
Off topic Only 1% of this speech directly addressed the bill under debate.
Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 34
32 of 80 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield myself such time as I may consume.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “the American people need to take note of the amount of rhetorical smog emanating from the other side of the Chamber,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “because it is obscene.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Our Democratic colleagues continue to weave together an entirely disingenuous and deceptive narrative that Democrats are the ones standing at the forefront of the conversation when it comes to supporting our Nation’s veterans.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That has never been the case and will never be the case.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “If Democrats truly cared enough about veterans, they would spend their time supporting Chairman Bost’s bill and not coming up with hack job,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “so-called solutions that do nothing to reform the VA and deliver high-quality care and service to those who have served this Nation.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “it is sad that our colleagues across the aisle have chosen this position.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is sad that they can gin up misleading narratives and hawk them around like someone delivering newspapers on a bike.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is what happens when personalities of the day and political gamesmanship subvert actual legislating, like what Chairman Bost and Republicans have been doing the entire time.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The former doesn’t deliver for veterans.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It treats them like second-class citizens.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Their solution is spending more money while delivering fewer outcomes.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Wow, color us shocked.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is a story as old as time.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans are focused on targeted relief.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is targeted relief that focuses on combat-disabled veterans, includes additional fairness safeguards,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and does not throw money at a problem with the meager hope of things fixing themselves by osmosis.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “that is the difference here.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “All Democrats see is another government program to funnel money into without any commitment whatsoever to improving the lives of those the program serves.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They will contort the language they use and the policy gimmicks they cook up to mislead people and organizations into believing mistruths.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As is evidenced by President Trump’s efforts, the efforts of Secretary Collins at the VA,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and the veteran-driven legislation here in Congress, Republicans see veterans and meet them where they are.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans see and understand the problems that veterans face every day and want to ensure that the VA is nimble, responsive,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and rightsized so that veterans are not left in the dark and to fend for themselves.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Here is a final little nugget that I will leave you with, Mr. Speaker:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I trust veterans to know and understand what veterans need and deserve.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “People are actually attuned to issues veterans face as opposed to those who simply haven’t the slightest clue.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Republicans are the ones with actual solutions here.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are not bloviating like so many have chosen to do.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are fighting for veterans, Mr. Speaker.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I reserve the balance of my time.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 1
45 of 80 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “the American people need to take note of the amount of rhetorical smog emanating from the other side of the Chamber,” Attacks the opposing party’s rhetoric instead of addressing the daylight saving time bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “because it is obscene.” Partisan invective unrelated to the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Our Democratic colleagues continue to weave together an entirely disingenuous and deceptive narrative that Democrats are the ones standing at the forefront of the conversation when it comes to supporting our Nation’s veterans.” Discusses a narrative about Democrats and veterans, not the Sunshine Protection Act.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That has never been the case and will never be the case.” Partisan claim about Democrats and veterans, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If Democrats truly cared enough about veterans, they would spend their time supporting Chairman Bost’s bill and not coming up with hack job,” Urges support for Chairman Bost’s veterans bill rather than the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so-called solutions that do nothing to reform the VA and deliver high-quality care and service to those who have served this Nation.” Criticizes Democratic VA proposals, unrelated to daylight saving time.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “it is sad that our colleagues across the aisle have chosen this position.” Partisan lament about colleagues’ position, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is sad that they can gin up misleading narratives and hawk them around like someone delivering newspapers on a bike.” Insult about Democrats’ narratives, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The bill before us ensures that combat-disabled servicemembers who were medically retired through no fault of their own receive the benefits they earned while maintaining equity across retiree populations.” Describes a veterans bill, not the Sunshine Protection Act before the House.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is what happens when personalities of the day and political gamesmanship subvert actual legislating, like what Chairman Bost and Republicans have been doing the entire time.” Partisan point about gamesmanship versus Chairman Bost’s legislating, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The former doesn’t deliver for veterans.” Attack on others’ veterans policy, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It treats them like second-class citizens.” Claim about others treating veterans poorly, unrelated to daylight saving.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Their solution is spending more money while delivering fewer outcomes.” Attack on opponents’ spending approach on veterans, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Wow, color us shocked.” Sarcastic aside unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is a story as old as time.” Rhetorical aside not about the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Instead, the bill before us today would reduce net direct spending by approximately $1.3 billion over the next 10 years.” Spending figure for a veterans bill, not the Sunshine Protection Act.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “9237 demonstrates that Congress can advance significant veterans’ priorities while remaining fiscally responsible and reducing overall Federal spending.” Praises H.R. 9237, a veterans bill, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans are focused on targeted relief.” Claims about Republicans’ veterans relief, unrelated to the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is targeted relief that focuses on combat-disabled veterans, includes additional fairness safeguards,” Describes veterans relief provisions, not the Sunshine Protection Act.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and does not throw money at a problem with the meager hope of things fixing themselves by osmosis.” Attack on opponents’ approach to veterans, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let’s run through what else you will not find in the cobbled- together,” Sets up a partisan list about Democratic proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so-called solutions that Democrats are throwing their weight behind.” Partisan framing of Democratic veterans proposals, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You won’t find a unified Democratic effort to reform the VA’s outdated construction and leasing processes that delay the opening of clinics and facilities across the country.” Attack on Democrats over VA reform, not the daylight saving bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In Chairman Bost’s bill, Republicans are doing just that.” Praises Chairman Bost’s bill, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You won’t find the Democratic commitment to ensure that veterans can continue to access the mental health care support services in the communities where they live nationwide.” Attack on Democrats over mental health care, unrelated to the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In Chairman Bost’s bill, it is there.” Praises Chairman Bost’s bill, not the Sunshine Protection Act.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You won’t find Democratic solutions to slash government bureaucracy that hinders veterans from accessing the care they deserve and earned.” Attack on Democrats over bureaucracy, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In Chairman Bost’s bill, they are there.” Praises Chairman Bost’s bill, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “that is the difference here.” Partisan contrast not about the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “All Democrats see is another government program to funnel money into without any commitment whatsoever to improving the lives of those the program serves.” Attack on Democrats over government programs, unrelated to daylight saving.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They will contort the language they use and the policy gimmicks they cook up to mislead people and organizations into believing mistruths.” Accusation that opponents mislead, not about the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “VSOs, the purpose-driven organizations that are dedicated to advocating for veterans, have been led to believe that Republicans somehow want to rob veterans of their benefits,” Discussion of VSOs and Republican benefits claims, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but that is entirely untrue.” Defense of Republicans on veterans benefits, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As is evidenced by President Trump’s efforts, the efforts of Secretary Collins at the VA,” Praise of Trump and Collins on veterans, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and the veteran-driven legislation here in Congress, Republicans see veterans and meet them where they are.” Claims about Republicans and veterans, unrelated to the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans see and understand the problems that veterans face every day and want to ensure that the VA is nimble, responsive,” Claims about Republicans and VA problems, not the daylight saving bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and rightsized so that veterans are not left in the dark and to fend for themselves.” Continues claims about the VA and veterans, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Here is a final little nugget that I will leave you with, Mr. Speaker:” Transition to a partisan point, not about the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The majority of our Republican members on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee are indeed veterans.” Point about committee membership and veteran status, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There is only one Democrat on that committee who is a veteran.” Committee composition point, not about the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I trust veterans to know and understand what veterans need and deserve.” Partisan trust claim about veterans, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “People are actually attuned to issues veterans face as opposed to those who simply haven’t the slightest clue.” Insinuation about opponents’ understanding, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Republicans are the ones with actual solutions here.” Partisan claim about who has solutions, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are not bloviating like so many have chosen to do.” Partisan jab at opponents, not about the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are fighting for veterans, Mr. Speaker.” Partisan claim about fighting for veterans, unrelated to the pending bill.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 93
3 of 80 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “That has never been the case and will never be the case” Asserts absolute historical and future certainty without any source or evidence.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “simply haven’t the slightest clue” Asserts knowledge of others’ ignorance as settled fact with no supporting source.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “actual solutions” Claims exclusive possession of real solutions as established fact rather than an argued position.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “ensures that combat-disabled servicemembers who were medically retired through no fault of their own receive the benefits they earned while maintaining equity across retiree populations” The bill before the House ensures that combat-disabled servicemembers who were medically retired through no fault of their own receive the benefits they earned while maintaining equity across retiree populations. search
2 “would reduce net direct spending by approximately $1.3 billion over the next 10 years” The bill before the House would reduce net direct spending by approximately $1.3 billion over the next 10 years. search
3 “The majority of our Republican members on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee are indeed veterans” A majority of the Republican members of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee are veterans. search
4 “There is only one Democrat on that committee who is a veteran.” Only one Democratic member of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee is a veteran. search