Analysis · Floor speech · beta

Kevin Kiley

1069 words · 41 sentences · 65 clauses

Statement grade
A–
Average 88 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 8%Claims 71%Reasoning 15%Promise 2%Positioning 5%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 16 wordsI have a few words to say today about protecting democracy in the State of California, ProcedureClaims · 40 wordsbecause there have been a number of recent examples of where the will of voters has been ignored, distorted, or overwritten in a way that has served to make our State less affordable and to lower our quality of life. Procedure · 10 wordsThere are a few basic ways that this has happened.Procedure Claims · 57 wordsThe first is simply enacting far-reaching policies without any vote of the people or of the legislature. We saw this with the State’s attempt to ban gas- powered cars, which was promulgated by the Governor and enacted by the Air Resources Board.1 The legislature never voted on it. The people of California certainly never voted on it. Reasoning · 18 wordsFortunately, because that order was predicated on Federal authority, we were able to take action here in Congress. Claims · 89 wordsI introduced a resolution to overturn that ban on gas-powered cars.2 It passed here in the House with very strong bipartisan support.3 It passed the Senate with bipartisan support, 4and it was signed into law by the President.5 You can now continue to drive the car of your choice, and the will of the people has prevailed because a poll from the Public Institute of California just showed that two-thirds of Californians, a supermajority of Californians, opposed the ban on gas-powered cars that they never got a say on.6 Procedure · 14 wordsYet, we are now seeing more of the same, even within the same genre, ProcedureClaims · 61 wordswhich is that the California Energy Commission recently issued an order to ban tires, 7or at least 70 percent of existing tires on the market.8 Now, estimates show that when Californians have to replace their tires, this will cost many of them hundreds of dollars. There is also good evidence suggesting that they will have to replace their tires more often, Reasoning · 8 wordsso they will have to buy more tires. Claims · 13 wordsThey will have to buy more expensive tires and will have more waste, Reasoning · 8 wordsso it will be bad for the environment. Claims · 37 wordsThis, once again, is a policy that the people of California did not vote on and that the legislature didn’t even vote on. I have joined my colleagues in calling on Governor Newsom to rescind this initiative, Promise · 17 wordsand we are exploring all options here in Congress for protecting the will of Californians, Vague promiseas well. Reasoning · 25 wordsThat is one way that we see the will of voters being simply ignored, by enacting policy without ever consulting them or their elected representatives. Claims · 15 wordsA second way that this happens is through the distortion of the ballot initiative process. Procedure · 10 wordsNow, this has been a longstanding problem, I must acknowledge, ProcedureClaims · 146 wordsand both Republicans and Democrats have been guilty of it when they hold the Office of the Attorney General in California because it is the attorney general who writes the little summaries that you see on the ballot. What we have seen, both in this coming election and in many previous elections, is that the attorney general has abused that power to write skewed summaries, to write descriptions of the ballot initiative that present a misleading idea of what the initiative will actually do. When I was in the legislature, I introduced legislation to remove this power from the attorney general, given that this is a partisan official, 9and put it in the hands of a nonpartisan office called the legislative analyst. This legislation was endorsed by the State’s leading newspapers, the L.A.10 Times, the Sacramento Bee, and the Orange County Register. Unfortunately, it never passed, Reasoning · 25 wordsso we continue to have an initiative process where politicians have skewed it in order to get their preference to override that of the voters. Claims · 151 wordsThe third way in which we see the will of voters being ignored or sidelined is that when an initiative passes, in some cases, politicians in Sacramento have simply decided to ignore it or to sabotage it. With Proposition 36, which was an initiative to restore commonsense consequences for retail theft and to get drug offenders the help that they need, the State’s political establishment led by Governor Newsom did everything they possibly could to oppose this initiative. Voters had other ideas and passed it with 68 percent of the vote.11 It passed in each and every one of California’s 58 counties.12 It passed with more votes than any initiative on the ballot that year. Rather than respecting the will of the voters, we have seen, in the 2 years since its passage, that the Governor and the legislature are refusing to adequately fund the initiative as directed by the voters. Procedure · 19 wordsThen, perhaps most egregiously, in some cases, we see the will of voters not only being compromised or sabotaged, ProcedureClaims · 73 wordsbut just outright overridden and ignored by actions of politicians in Sacramento. This was most clear in a recent measure as part of what has been called the largest tax increase in California history to raise taxes on healthcare. The legislature and the Governor have instituted a new healthcare tax called the managed care organization tax, 13which the nonpartisan legislative analyst estimates will increase healthcare premiums by $400 for a family of four.14 Positioning · 8 wordsNow, this is bad enough on its face, PositioningClaims · 50 wordsbut what is worse is that California voters specifically passed an initiative just a couple of years ago saying that this tax cannot be raised, that this healthcare tax cannot be increased. Yet, the State’s politicians decided to override the express orders of voters and to raise their costs anyway. Procedure · 11 wordsThere is a way we can fight back here, as well.Procedure Claims · 22 wordsI have asked the Department of Health and Human Services not to approve this new tax increase, 15which is required under law. Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 75 wordsI think it is a very troubling trend when you see the will of California voters not being respected because, in each of these cases, you see those who are in positions of authority in Sacramento taking actions that run against what Californians want for good reason, because it is increasing their costs, the cost of their cars, the cost of their tires, the cost of healthcare, or it is making our communities less safe. Positioning · 43 wordsI view an important part of my job here to be a check and balance in a way that protects the will of California voters and certainly serves to be a check and balance against measures that have made our State so unaffordable.Positioning Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 8 wordsI yield back the balance of my time.Procedure

Analyzed on