← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning and Clarity. Average 76 / 100
Signal
89 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
50 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
90 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 59% Positioning 10% Reasoning 11% Promise 19%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 52 words I rise today to highlight the release of Venkata Vasamsetty from ICE custody.1 Ms. Vasamsetty is a Wake County substitute teacher, a mother, and a grandmother of U.S. citizens, who has lived in this country legally for 27 years with no criminal record.2 Last month, ICE arrested her and wrongfully detained her.3 Positioning · 14 words By every measure, she is an asset to our community and poses no threat. Positioning Claims · 28 words Under this administration, thousands of other law-abiding immigrants just like her are being held in detention facilities, often without access to proper medical care and humane living conditions. Logical leap Logical leap Logical leap Reasoning · 15 words It is wrong to use the American taxpayers’ dollars to detain people like Ms. Vasamsetty. Promise · 26 words We must continue to speak out against ICE’s cruel and unlawful actions. Vague promise We cannot allow this administration to continue detaining our neighbors and terrorizing our communities.
At a glance
Lost points for Logical leap ×3 Positioning Vague promise
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 89
1 of 5 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “By every measure, she is an asset to our community and poses no threat.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 50
3 of 5 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “Under this administration, thousands of other law-abiding immigrants just like her are being held in detention facilities, often without access to proper medical care and humane living conditions.” The reason for ‘people like her’ rests on generalizing from a single case to thousands of detainees.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “Under this administration, thousands of other law-abiding immigrants just like her are being held in detention facilities, often without access to proper medical care and humane living conditions.” The call for continued opposition rests on extending one person’s detention to a general pattern of misconduct.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “Under this administration, thousands of other law-abiding immigrants just like her are being held in detention facilities, often without access to proper medical care and humane living conditions.” The sweeping claim about the administration rests on a generalization drawn from a single case, and ‘terrorizing’ is left unsupported.
Conclusions found · 3
Conclusion “It is wrong to use the American taxpayers’ dollars to detain people like Ms. Vasamsetty.”
Because “and a grandmother of U.S. citizens, who has lived in this country legally for 27 years with no criminal record.”
“By every measure, she is an asset to our community and poses no threat.”
“Under this administration, thousands of other law-abiding immigrants just like her are being held in detention facilities, often without access to proper medical care and humane living conditions.”
Reason flawed The reason for ‘people like her’ rests on generalizing from a single case to thousands of detainees.
Conclusion “We must continue to speak out against ICE’s cruel and unlawful actions.”
Because “Last month, ICE arrested her and wrongfully detained her.”
“Under this administration, thousands of other law-abiding immigrants just like her are being held in detention facilities, often without access to proper medical care and humane living conditions.”
Reason flawed The call for continued opposition rests on extending one person’s detention to a general pattern of misconduct.
Conclusion “We cannot allow this administration to continue detaining our neighbors and terrorizing our communities.”
Because “Under this administration, thousands of other law-abiding immigrants just like her are being held in detention facilities, often without access to proper medical care and humane living conditions.”
Reason flawed The sweeping claim about the administration rests on a generalization drawn from a single case, and ‘terrorizing’ is left unsupported.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 90
1 of 5 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We must continue to speak out” A commitment with no specific action, measure, or success condition beyond ongoing speech.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the release of Venkata Vasamsetty from ICE custody” Venkata Vasamsetty was released from ICE custody. search 2 “has lived in this country legally for 27 years with no criminal record” Venkata Vasamsetty has lived in the United States legally for 27 years and has no criminal record. search 3 “Last month, ICE arrested her” ICE arrested Venkata Vasamsetty in August 2026. search
