← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: nothing in it to grade. No clause makes a claim, gives a reason, makes a promise or asks for anything. Not graded
Signal
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 90 words pursuant to House Resolution 1499, I call up the bill (H.R.1 4795) to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution that participates in a nonexpressive commercial boycott of Israel from being eligible for certain funds under that Act, to require an institution that participates in certain programs under that Act to certify that students are not unreasonably obstructed from participating in academic programs in Israel, 2 3 4 and for other purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House. The Clerk read the title of the bill. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×5
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 0
5 of 5 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “pursuant to House Resolution 1499, I call up the bill (H.R.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “4795) to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution that participates in a nonexpressive commercial boycott of Israel from being eligible for certain funds under that Act, to require an institution that participates in certain programs under that Act to certify that students are not unreasonably obstructed from participating in academic programs in Israel,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “and for other purposes,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “and ask for its immediate consideration in the House.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The Clerk read the title of the bill.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · no score
No score. Excluded from the average.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “pursuant to House Resolution 1499, I call up the bill” Tim Walberg called up H.R. 4795 on the House floor pursuant to House Resolution 1499. search 2 “4795) to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution that participates in a nonexpressive commercial boycott of Israel from being eligible for certain funds under that Act, to require an institution that participates in certain programs under that Act to certify that students are not unreasonably obstructed from participating in academic programs in Israel, ” H.R. 4795 would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965. search 3 “to prohibit an institution that participates in a nonexpressive commercial boycott of Israel from being eligible for certain funds under that Act” H.R. 4795 would make institutions participating in a nonexpressive commercial boycott of Israel ineligible for certain Higher Education Act funds. search 4 “to require an institution that participates in certain programs under that Act to certify that students are not unreasonably obstructed from participating in academic programs in Israel” H.R. 4795 would require participating institutions to certify that students are not unreasonably obstructed from participating in academic programs in Israel. search
