← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance and Clarity is 80. The grade is held to 70, 30 above Relevance. 70 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
40 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 74% The ask 26%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 48 words my amendment does not slow progress. It strengthens it. By ensuring Tribal nations and impacted communities have a real seat at the table, we produce more informed and more mindful policy outcomes. Respecting Tribal sovereignty and listening to affected communities is not optional. It is a fundamental obligation. Off point The ask · 17 words For those reasons, Mr. Speaker, I oppose H.R. 1501, and urge my colleagues to do the same.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×3
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 40
3 of 3 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “By ensuring Tribal nations and impacted communities have a real seat at the table, we produce more informed and more mindful policy outcomes.” Speaks generally about Tribal consultation producing better policy rather than the bill’s expedited environmental review provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Respecting Tribal sovereignty and listening to affected communities is not optional.” Makes a general point about respecting Tribal sovereignty, not about the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is a fundamental obligation.” A general assertion of obligation, not addressing the bill’s content.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.