← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Reasoning and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down.
Average 58 / 100
Signal
32 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
41 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Reasoning
77 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
83 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 6% Claims 13% Reasoning 17% Positioning 58% Thanks 3% The ask 3%
Structure · 11 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 24 words I rise today in strong support of H.J. Res. 1, proposing a constitutional amendment to maintain nine Justices on the United States Supreme Court. Procedure Claims · 33 words The composition of the Supreme Court has consistently been maintained at nine members for over 150 years, a period of time during which the Court issued some of its most important constitutional jurisprudence.1 Reasoning · 30 words Throughout these years, and as the Founders intended, the Court has served as a vital check on government power, blocking those actions that violate the Constitution and threaten individual liberty. Claims · 20 words We must remember that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution. Positioning · 215 words In recent years, however, and as the Supreme Court has correctly returned to its originalist roots, there are many on the left who have sought to politicize the Court. Unearned certainty They justify their actions not because the Court’s decisions do not fully comport with the Constitution but because such decisions undermine the leftist views of the world and the radical agenda as described repeatedly today by those on the other side. Off point Straw man Their solution to losing these constitutional legal arguments isn’t to seek to change the law but to attack the Supreme Court and threaten to pack it with judicial advocates. They thus seek to upend and eradicate 150 years of precedent to further their political agenda, an agenda that they have been unable to pursue through the legislative process. We know their agenda is both unwise and unpopular amongst the American people and will only serve to politicize a body that was always meant to be independent and impartial. Unearned certainty Calls for packing the Supreme Court, whether it be from FDR over half a century ago or from elected Democrat officials in the 21st century, are designed to do one of two things: 2 threaten and hold the Court hostage to control its decisions or to load it with political actors so as to change its nature entirely. Positioning Reasoning · 37 words Members of this body and the American public at large should recall that when one branch of government consumes another and controls its functions, the Republic ceases to exist and we descend into a state of tyranny, Positioning · 14 words which is what the Democrats are seeking and especially the Democratic Socialists of America. Positioning Off point Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 13 words I thank Representative Biggs and Chairman Jordan for their leadership on this legislation, Thanks The ask · 12 words and I urge all of my colleagues to support H.J. Res. 1.
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×9 Off point ×7 Procedure ×3 Unearned certainty ×2 Straw man Thanks
Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 32
13 of 23 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I rise today in strong support of H.J.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Res.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “1, proposing a constitutional amendment to maintain nine Justices on the United States Supreme Court.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “In recent years, however,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and as the Supreme Court has correctly returned to its originalist roots, there are many on the left who have sought to politicize the Court.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They justify their actions not because the Court’s decisions do not fully comport with the Constitution but because such decisions undermine the leftist views of the world and the radical agenda as described repeatedly today by those on the other side.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Their solution to losing these constitutional legal arguments isn’t to seek to change the law but to attack the Supreme Court and threaten to pack it with judicial advocates.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They thus seek to upend and eradicate 150 years of precedent to further their political agenda, an agenda that they have been unable to pursue through the legislative process.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We know their agenda is both unwise and unpopular amongst the American people and will only serve to politicize a body that was always meant to be independent and impartial.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Calls for packing the Supreme Court, whether it be from FDR over half a century ago or from elected Democrat officials in the 21st century, are designed to do one of two things:” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “threaten and hold the Court hostage to control its decisions or to load it with political actors so as to change its nature entirely.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “which is what the Democrats are seeking and especially the Democratic Socialists of America.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I thank Representative Biggs and Chairman Jordan for their leadership on this legislation,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 41
7 of 23 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They justify their actions not because the Court’s decisions do not fully comport with the Constitution but because such decisions undermine the leftist views of the world and the radical agenda as described repeatedly today by those on the other side.” Attacks opponents’ motives rather than addressing the resolution’s provision on the Court’s composition.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They thus seek to upend and eradicate 150 years of precedent to further their political agenda, an agenda that they have been unable to pursue through the legislative process.” Political attack on opponents’ agenda rather than the bill’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We know their agenda is both unwise and unpopular amongst the American people and will only serve to politicize a body that was always meant to be independent and impartial.” Claims about the popularity of opponents’ agenda, not the resolution under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Calls for packing the Supreme Court, whether it be from FDR over half a century ago or from elected Democrat officials in the 21st century, are designed to do one of two things:” Discusses court-packing calls generally rather than the amendment itself.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “threaten and hold the Court hostage to control its decisions or to load it with political actors so as to change its nature entirely.” Describes opponents’ alleged designs rather than the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Members of this body and the American public at large should recall that when one branch of government consumes another and controls its functions, the Republic ceases to exist and we descend into a state of tyranny,” Warnings about tyranny depart from the resolution’s content.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which is what the Democrats are seeking and especially the Democratic Socialists of America.” Partisan attack on Democrats and DSA, not the bill.
Reasoning · 77
1 of 23 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Straw man Arguing against a position the other side did not take. What the tags mean → “They justify their actions not because the Court’s decisions do not fully comport with the Constitution but because such decisions undermine the leftist views of the world and the radical agenda as described repeatedly today by those on the other side.” The clauses attribute motives and restate opponents’ position as purely political rather than legal, without evidence for unpopularity.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “We know their agenda is both unwise and unpopular amongst the American people and will only serve to politicize a body that was always meant to be independent and impartial.”
Because “and as the Supreme Court has correctly returned to its originalist roots, there are many on the left who have sought to politicize the Court.”
“They justify their actions not because the Court’s decisions do not fully comport with the Constitution but because such decisions undermine the leftist views of the world and the radical agenda as described repeatedly today by those on the other side.”
“Their solution to losing these constitutional legal arguments isn’t to seek to change the law but to attack the Supreme Court and threaten to pack it with judicial advocates.”
“They thus seek to upend and eradicate 150 years of precedent to further their political agenda, an agenda that they have been unable to pursue through the legislative process.”
Reason flawed The clauses attribute motives and restate opponents’ position as purely political rather than legal, without evidence for unpopularity.
Conclusion “and I urge all of my colleagues to support H.J.”
Because “The composition of the Supreme Court has consistently been maintained at nine members for over 150 years, a period of time during which the Court issued some of its most important constitutional jurisprudence.”
“and as the Founders intended, the Court has served as a vital check on government power, blocking those actions that violate the Constitution and threaten individual liberty.”
“Members of this body and the American public at large should recall that when one branch of government consumes another and controls its functions, the Republic ceases to exist and we descend into a state of tyranny,”
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 83
2 of 23 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “as the Supreme Court has correctly returned to its originalist roots” Declares the Court’s jurisprudence ‘correct’ as an accepted fact rather than offering a source or argument.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We know their agenda is both unwise and unpopular” Asserts certainty about public opinion and the merits of opponents’ agenda with no source offered.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “The composition of the Supreme Court has consistently been maintained at nine members for over 150 years” search
2 “FDR over half a century ago” search