Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Harriet M. Hageman

398 words · 16 sentences · 21 clauses

Statement grade
C–
Average 58 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 6%Claims 13%Reasoning 17%Positioning 58%Thanks 3%The ask 3%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 24 wordsI rise today in strong support of H.J. Res. 1, proposing a constitutional amendment to maintain nine Justices on the United States Supreme Court.Procedure Claims · 33 wordsThe composition of the Supreme Court has consistently been maintained at nine members for over 150 years, a period of time during which the Court issued some of its most important constitutional jurisprudence.1 Reasoning · 30 wordsThroughout these years, and as the Founders intended, the Court has served as a vital check on government power, blocking those actions that violate the Constitution and threaten individual liberty. Claims · 20 wordsWe must remember that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution. Positioning · 215 wordsIn recent years, however, and as the Supreme Court has correctly returned to its originalist roots, there are many on the left who have sought to politicize the Court.Unearned certainty They justify their actions not because the Court’s decisions do not fully comport with the Constitution but because such decisions undermine the leftist views of the world and the radical agenda as described repeatedly today by those on the other side.Off pointStraw man Their solution to losing these constitutional legal arguments isn’t to seek to change the law but to attack the Supreme Court and threaten to pack it with judicial advocates. They thus seek to upend and eradicate 150 years of precedent to further their political agenda, an agenda that they have been unable to pursue through the legislative process. We know their agenda is both unwise and unpopular amongst the American people and will only serve to politicize a body that was always meant to be independent and impartial.Unearned certainty Calls for packing the Supreme Court, whether it be from FDR over half a century ago or from elected Democrat officials in the 21st century, are designed to do one of two things: 2threaten and hold the Court hostage to control its decisions or to load it with political actors so as to change its nature entirely.Positioning Reasoning · 37 wordsMembers of this body and the American public at large should recall that when one branch of government consumes another and controls its functions, the Republic ceases to exist and we descend into a state of tyranny, Positioning · 14 wordswhich is what the Democrats are seeking and especially the Democratic Socialists of America.PositioningOff point Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 13 wordsI thank Representative Biggs and Chairman Jordan for their leadership on this legislation, ThanksThe ask · 12 wordsand I urge all of my colleagues to support H.J. Res. 1.

Analyzed on