Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Jared Huffman

552 words · 33 sentences · 40 clauses

Statement grade
A–
Average 88 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 3%Claims 68%Positioning 15%Promise 3%Reasoning 5%The ask 5%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 9 wordsI yield myself such time as I may consume.Procedure Mr. Speaker, Claims · 49 wordsthe Congress returned yesterday from a long district work period where most of us heard a lot of things from our constituents.1 They told us about the grinding cost of groceries, gas, and healthcare and the instability their small businesses face thanks to President Trump’s trade war with Canada.Off point Positioning · 8 wordsWhat is the House majority prioritizing this week?Positioning Claims · 47 wordsIt is a bill that will push a critically endangered whale closer to extinction. I don’t think many of us heard this as a priority from our constituents. H.R. 9436 would extend the regulatory pause on North Atlantic right whale protections from fishing gear entanglements through 2035.2 Positioning · 50 wordsThis bill sells our fishing communities a false promise. We may hear that kicking the can down the road saves the Maine lobster fleet. In reality, this bill would lock in a broken status quo that guarantees disaster for both our historic coastal industry and the critically endangered right whale.PositioningUnearned certainty Claims · 98 wordsRight now, fewer than 380 North Atlantic right whales remain on Earth, with only 70 breeding females.3 Over 85 percent have experienced at least one fishing gear entanglement, 4and since 2022, at least 31 whales have suffered severe injuries or death because of entanglements.5 In late 2022, Congress inappropriately paused all additional measures to protect these whales from fishing gear entanglements until 2029.6 This pause was advertised as a stakeholders’ window of opportunity to give NOAA time to partner with fishermen, States, and technology companies to gather data to test and deploy safer fishing gear, namely, ropeless gear. Positioning · 8 wordsInstead, that pause becomes a license for complacency.Positioning Claims · 106 wordsNOAA is lying down on the job, dragging its feet, firing staff, axing science, and deprioritizing ropeless gear, perhaps because they think Congress will bail them out and kick the can a little further down the road. All of this is illegal, and all of it is causing massive uncertainty for the lobster fishery. Now, 2 years ahead of the deadline, this bill would add another 7- year delay.7 Instead of holding NOAA accountable, House Republicans want to freeze action until 2035, abandoning accountability and setting up our fishermen for failure. The solution already exists. On-demand ropeless gear reduces deadly entanglements of whales without sacrificing catch. Promise · 18 wordsWe can have this fishing industry. We can protect it for the long haul with this win-win solution. Claims · 78 wordsFishermen are actively testing and using ropeless gear right now. They have landed over 1 million pounds of seafood using these methods.8 This bill, though, would destroy the market incentives to deploy these safer and innovative technologies, damaging consumer confidence in the environmental sustainability of American seafood. It would unfairly place greater conservation burdens on the other Atlantic coast communities, from Florida to Maine, who are actively trying to do their part to save this whale from extinction. Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 19 wordslet’s stop pretending that House Republicans and this administration care about the fishermen, coastal communities, or these iconic whales.PositioningOff point Reasoning · 28 wordsIf Congress can arbitrarily grant a decade-plus statutory exemption to bypass protections for a critically endangered species, then the Endangered Species Act is reduced to a hollow success. Mr. Speaker, The ask · 27 wordsI urge my colleagues to fight for strong, sustainable fisheries and to defend Federal wildlife protection laws, reject this dangerous precedent, and vote ``no’’ on H.R. 9436. Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsI reserve the balance of my time.Procedure

Analyzed on