Claims 70% Procedure 4% Positioning 1% Reasoning 13% The ask 13% The question 1%
Structure · 17 steps
Claims · 14
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. President, Claims · 11 words my fine State of Wisconsin has a gray wolf population problem, Procedure · 7 words but that was not always the case. Procedure Claims · 122 words Back in the eighties and nineties, we had the opposite problem. We had an endangered wolf population, as probably most of the lower 48 States did. So back in 1978, under the Endangered Species Act, the gray wolf was listed as one of those endangered species.1 The good news is, it worked. You can see from the chart here--that starts in 1980 to about the year 1999--our wolf population slowly started coming back, to the point that in 1999, the Wisconsin DNR agreed that once we hit 250 gray wolves in Wisconsin, that would be the point at which we could delist the gray wolf as no longer an endangered species.2 We didn’t delist them. The population continued to grow and grow, Procedure · 2 words and unfortunately, Procedure Claims · 74 words as much as we all value a healthy and sustainable gray wolf population, there is a point at which it gets too large and it starts threatening livestock, starts threatening people. I think the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recognized that fact, and so in 2007, the gray wolf was actually delisted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.3 The problem is, in 2008, it was relisted by a Federal court here in DC.4 Procedure · 8 words So in 2009, we took action once again. Procedure Claims · 112 words The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf.5 That same year, that same court relisted it.6 Three years later--again, looking at the science, looking at the growing population--in 2012, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted it.7 Three years later, the same DC court relisted it.8 In 2021, again, you can start seeing the explosion, quite honestly, in population. Our Wisconsin DNA states that about 1,250 is really the most population of gray wolf that the State can sustain.9 We had already hit that level, so U.S. Fish and Wildlife delisted it again, only to be overturned in 2022 by a Federal court decision in California this time, not DC.10 Positioning · 5 words Why is this a problem? Positioning Claims · 134 words We get report after report of families, farmers in Wisconsin who are bearing the burden of this back-and-forth, of the fact that the gray wolf is protected and the populations are really at the maximum level right now. It is threatening livestock. I mean, throughout Wisconsin, wolves are killing cows, horses, goats, sheep, cats, dogs. We have a sheep farm in Wisconsin, and a multigeneration herd of sheep was all wiped out except for one sheep, in one night.11 In Price County, a dairy farmer had to sell his entire herd because the wolves kept killing his cows.12 Wisconsinites have to carry firearms just to walk their dogs. A Wood County resident was forced to drive their children to school because the bus route changed because wolf tracks were there at the bus stop.13 Reasoning · 70 words So, Mr. President, you know, I am just asking what makes sense when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has--one, two, three, four, five-- four times taken the gray wolves off the endangered species list, which, again, we all agreed was required. Unearned certainty We should have all agreed it was successful. Unearned certainty We are way past the delisting baseline established by the Wisconsin DNR. We are at the maximum sustainable limit here. The ask · 19 words I am asking consent to pass a bill that would simply delist them so that Wisconsin farmers, Wisconsin families, Reasoning · 14 words and Wisconsin children can feel safe in their residences, in walking about their properties. Off point The ask · 63 words So, Mr. President, notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Environment and Public Works be discharged from further consideration of S.14 1306 and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration; further, that the bill be considered read a third time and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Procedure · 1 words Curtis). Procedure The question · 4 words Is there an objection? Procedure · 5 words The Senator from New Jersey. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×40 Procedure ×5 Unearned certainty ×2 Positioning
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 95
6 of 48 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “but that was not always the case.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “and unfortunately,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “So in 2009, we took action once again.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Why is this a problem?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Curtis).” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The Senator from New Jersey.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 10
40 of 48 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “my fine State of Wisconsin has a gray wolf population problem,” The speech turns to Wisconsin’s gray wolf population, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but that was not always the case.” Continues the wolf topic rather than the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Back in the eighties and nineties, we had the opposite problem.” Historical wolf population, unrelated to the legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We had an endangered wolf population,” Endangered wolf population in Wisconsin, not the bill before the Senate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as probably most of the lower 48 States did.” Wolf listing across the lower 48, unrelated to the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “So back in 1978, under the Endangered Species Act, the gray wolf was listed as one of those endangered species.” The 1978 ESA listing of the gray wolf is not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The good news is, it worked.” Commentary on the wolf recovery program, not the pending legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You can see from the chart here--that starts in 1980 to about the year 1999--our wolf population slowly started coming back, to the point that in 1999, the Wisconsin DNR agreed that once we hit 250 gray wolves in Wisconsin, that would be the point at which we could delist the gray wolf as no longer an endangered species.” Wisconsin DNR wolf delisting threshold, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We didn’t delist them.” Failure to delist wolves is not what the pending bill addresses.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The population continued to grow and grow,” Wolf population growth, unrelated to the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and unfortunately,” Transition in the wolf narrative, not the pending legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as much as we all value a healthy and sustainable gray wolf population, there is a point at which it gets too large and it starts threatening livestock, starts threatening people.” Wolves threatening livestock and people, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I think the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recognized that fact,” Fish and Wildlife Service’s view on wolves, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and so in 2007, the gray wolf was actually delisted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.” The 2007 wolf delisting is unrelated to the legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The problem is, in 2008, it was relisted by a Federal court here in DC.” A 2008 court relisting of wolves, not the bill before the Senate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “So in 2009, we took action once again.” Further wolf delisting action, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf.” The 2009 wolf delisting is not what the pending bill addresses.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That same year, that same court relisted it.” Court relisting of wolves, unrelated to the legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Three years later--again, looking at the science, looking at the growing population--in 2012, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted it.” The 2012 wolf delisting, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Three years later, the same DC court relisted it.” Another court relisting of wolves, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In 2021, again, you can start seeing the explosion, quite honestly, in population.” Wolf population growth in 2021, not the pending legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Our Wisconsin DNA states that about 1,250 is really the most population of gray wolf that the State can sustain.” Wisconsin’s sustainable wolf population figure, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We had already hit that level,” Wolf population at capacity, not the bill before the Senate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so U.S. Fish and Wildlife delisted it again, only to be overturned in 2022 by a Federal court decision in California this time, not DC.” The 2022 wolf relisting by a California court, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Why is this a problem?” Rhetorical question about the wolf listing, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We get report after report of families, farmers in Wisconsin who are bearing the burden of this back-and-forth, of the fact that the gray wolf is protected and the populations are really at the maximum level right now.” Burden on Wisconsin families and farmers from wolf listing, unrelated to the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is threatening livestock.” Livestock threats from wolves, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I mean, throughout Wisconsin, wolves are killing cows, horses, goats, sheep, cats, dogs.” Wolves killing animals across Wisconsin, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have a sheep farm in Wisconsin,” A Wisconsin sheep farm, unrelated to the pending legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and a multigeneration herd of sheep was all wiped out except for one sheep, in one night.” Sheep killed by wolves, not the bill before the Senate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In Price County, a dairy farmer had to sell his entire herd because the wolves kept killing his cows.” A dairy farmer losing his herd to wolves, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Wisconsinites have to carry firearms just to walk their dogs.” Residents carrying firearms against wolves, unrelated to the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A Wood County resident was forced to drive their children to school because the bus route changed because wolf tracks were there at the bus stop.” A school bus route change due to wolf tracks, not the legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “So, Mr. President, you know, I am just asking what makes sense when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has--one, two, three, four, five-- four times taken the gray wolves off the endangered species list,” The history of wolf delistings, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which, again, we all agreed was required.” Agreement on wolf delisting, not the pending bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We should have all agreed it was successful.” The success of the wolf recovery program, unrelated to the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are way past the delisting baseline established by the Wisconsin DNR.” Wolf population versus the delisting baseline, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are at the maximum sustainable limit here.” Maximum sustainable wolf population, not the bill before the Senate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am asking consent to pass a bill that would simply delist them so that Wisconsin farmers, Wisconsin families,” Request to pass a wolf-delisting bill instead of the AGOA Extension Act.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and Wisconsin children can feel safe in their residences, in walking about their properties.” Safety of Wisconsin residents from wolves, unrelated to the pending bill.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 97
2 of 48 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “we all agreed” Asserts a universal consensus as fact without citing who agreed or any record of it.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We should have all agreed it was successful” Presumes a shared judgment of success without offering any source or measure behind it.
Claims · 14
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “back in 1978, under the Endangered Species Act, the gray wolf was listed as one of those endangered species” In 1978 the gray wolf was listed as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. search
2 “in 1999, the Wisconsin DNR agreed that once we hit 250 gray wolves in Wisconsin, that would be the point at which we could delist the gray wolf” In 1999 the Wisconsin DNR set 250 gray wolves as the population level at which the wolf could be delisted in Wisconsin. search
3 “in 2007, the gray wolf was actually delisted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service” In 2007 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf. search
4 “in 2008, it was relisted by a Federal court here in DC” In 2008 a federal court in Washington, DC relisted the gray wolf. search
5 “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf” In 2009 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service again delisted the gray wolf. search
6 “That same year, that same court relisted it” In 2009 the same DC federal court relisted the gray wolf. search
7 “in 2012, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted it” In 2012 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf. search
8 “Three years later, the same DC court relisted it” In 2014 a DC federal court relisted the gray wolf. search
9 “Our Wisconsin DNA states that about 1,250 is really the most population of gray wolf that the State can sustain” The Wisconsin DNR states that about 1,250 gray wolves is the maximum sustainable population for the State. search
10 “U.S. Fish and Wildlife delisted it again, only to be overturned in 2022 by a Federal court decision in California this time, not DC” In 2021 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the gray wolf, and in 2022 a federal court in California overturned that delisting. search
11 “a multigeneration herd of sheep was all wiped out except for one sheep, in one night” A sheep farm in Wisconsin lost a multigeneration sheep herd in one night in a wolf attack, with only one sheep surviving. search
12 “In Price County, a dairy farmer had to sell his entire herd because the wolves kept killing his cows” A dairy farmer in Price County, Wisconsin sold his entire herd after wolves kept killing his cows. search
13 “A Wood County resident was forced to drive their children to school because the bus route changed because wolf tracks were there at the bus stop” A Wood County, Wisconsin bus route was changed due to wolf tracks at the bus stop, requiring a resident to drive their children to school. search
14 “So, Mr. President, notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Environment and Public Works be discharged from further consideration of S.” S. 1306, relating to gray wolf delisting, was under consideration by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works as of August 2026. search