Thanks 9% Claims 52% Promise 4% The ask 11% Reasoning 7% Procedure 5% Positioning 11% Aside 1%
Structure · 41 steps
Claims · 13
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. President, Thanks · 125 words before I begin my remarks today, I must say that with a heavy heart I am grieving today for town marshal Brad Fisher, a 25-year law enforcement veteran who was tragically killed today in the line of duty in Indiana.1 Marshal Fisher was assisting other officers in stopping a fleeing suspect when the suspect hit Marshal Fisher and ultimately killed him.2 I am praying for Marshal Fisher, for his family, everyone in the town of Lynn, IN, and Randolph County. What a devastating loss, a tragic loss. May he rest in peace. And may we always remember the sacrifice that all of our men and women of law enforcement make when they keep us safe. I just want to take a minute and remember him. Thanks Off point Mr. President, Claims · 48 words President Trump recently confirmed what many of us already knew: Unearned certainty that foreign adversaries like China are working daily to interfere in our elections and our democratic society. China especially seeks America’s decline in hopes that they can establish a world order that runs through the Chinese Communist Party, Promise · 15 words and we must do everything possible that we can to stop them from doing that. Vague promise Claims · 36 words Historically, when countries have held that kind of ambition, they have started big, catastrophic wars. It should come as no surprise that the People’s Liberation Army is undertaking the largest peacetime military buildup in human history. The ask · 37 words That is why it is incumbent upon this body to fully fund our military--including President Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense budget request that he has made of this body--so that we can deter exactly that kind of conflict.3 Claims · 34 words It is outrageous that our colleagues on the other side of the aisle-- the Democrats--are holding up this bipartisan NDAA and budget request to fund our military when our military desperately needs our support. Reasoning · 16 words Yet, even if we successfully deter a hot conflict, we could still lose in other ways. Claims · 57 words That is because every day the CCP is waging economic and political warfare against us. The CCP is trying to nurture dependency, exploit our divisions, cause us to question the justness of our cause, and erode our democracy. This political warfare campaign is not confined to the shadows. In many cases, it operates out in the open. Procedure · 8 words Just take a look at Neville Roy Singham. Procedure Claims · 57 words Singham is a 72-year-old American tech mogul who sold his company and immediately fled to China.4 From his Shanghai office--which he shares with a CCP propaganda outlet--whose avowed mission, by the way, is ``to tell China’s story well’’--Singham began funding a complex network of leftwing NGOs and nonprofits that advance the interests of the Chinese Communist Party.5 Procedure · 33 words Take a look at some of the radical organizations on this chart that he supports through the billions of dollars that he made selling his tech company to a Chinese Communist Party business. Procedure Claims · 156 words This is all a matter of public record. Even the New York Times has marveled at the hundreds of millions of dollars that Singham-linked groups have funneled to radical nonprofits that ``mix progressive advocacy with Chinese Government talking points.’’6 Take one example that you and I know well--CODEPINK--you know, the radical organization that chases many of us around the hallways--around this building and our office buildings. You see, CODEPINK used to condemn CCP human rights abuses. But after Singham started lavishly funding the group--and then, by the way, he married its cofounder--CODEPINK stopped criticizing the Chinese Government and started defending it.7 In fact, in recent years, CODEPINK has even provided cover for the CCP’s shocking genocide in Xinjiang. Meanwhile, a newer Singham nonprofit called No Cold War is entirely dedicated to advocacy designed to ensure America is defenseless against the CCP’s economic, military, and political warfare. But the Singham network is not limited to China-specific advocacy. Positioning · 24 words Singham groups advance a wide variety of causes that are united only by their hatred of America, our allies, and the rule of law. Positioning Claims · 27 words From anti-ICE boycotts, violence against law enforcement, rioting, obstruction, and support for Hamas’ attempted genocide of Jews in Israel, Singham groups and their members advance division, chaos, Positioning · 12 words and hatred. All of this advances CCP interests and poisons our society. Positioning Claims · 26 words Thankfully, under President Trump’s leadership, the Department of Justice is now investigating this and whether Singham has been fueling this lawlessness in violation of U.S. law.8 Positioning · 7 words It has been a long time coming. Positioning Claims · 104 words At the same time, the State Department under Secretary Rubio is leading from the front in identifying leftwing violence and building an international coalition to confront it. It should come as no surprise that, as the CCP seeks to interfere in our society, it also seeks to interfere in our elections. As President Trump disclosed before the American people in a prime-time address earlier this month, China perpetrated the largest known compromise of United States voter information in history: 9 stealing the personal data of over 220 million Americans in the 2020 election.10 The President also exposed ongoing vulnerabilities when it comes to America’s elections, Aside · 6 words and thank God he did that. Aside Procedure · 7 words As one newly declassified intelligence assessment found: 11 Procedure Claims · 8 words Our adversaries are actively coming for our elections, Positioning · 74 words and if that is not enough to sound the alarm--what you just heard from President Trump in his prime-time press conference and what I just shared with you--I don’t know what else is. All Americans--especially my colleagues in this body--should be outraged by this vulnerability. We know that our adversaries like the CCP seek to do us harm and yet we stand by and often do nothing about it. Our inaction has no excuse. Positioning Promise · 14 words We need to safeguard our democracy, Vague promise and we need to do it right now. The ask · 74 words If this Chamber does anything at all this year, it must ensure that American elections are for Americans only--now and always. That is precisely why we have got to pass the SAVE America Act, and we have to pass it now, ASAP. In the face of the CCP’s coordinated campaign, we need more election integrity--not less. Vague promise We need to ensure that all votes in American elections come from Americans--not illegal aliens or foreign manipulation. Procedure · 22 words And by the way, it is not only because of our international adversaries that we need to pass the SAVE America Act. Procedure Claims · 42 words Just last week, a huge story hardly got any notice in the mainstream media. But the new Democrat Governor of New Jersey--a former colleague of mine in the House--she announced that 6,600 noncitizens were ``accidentally added to the New Jersey voter rolls.’’12 Aside · 7 words That is a hell of an accident. Aside Claims · 101 words But not only that, she also told us that nearly 400 of those voters, who were accidentally placed on their voter rolls, actually voted in the last two elections in New Jersey.13 Some of my colleagues keep saying that stories like this are a figment of our imagination. It doesn’t really happen. Illegals don’t vote in American elections. The Democratic Governor of New Jersey just told us it did happen. They keep saying that these stories are just, I suppose, ``accidents’’ or ``software glitches’’ is what the Governor called it. The fact of the matter is that these stories keep happening, Unearned certainty Promise · 15 words and we need to do everything that we can to put an end to it. Vague promise Reasoning · 13 words It destroys trust in our elections when Americans read about stories like that. The ask · 20 words If we have to cancel the August recess to pass the SAVE America Act, so be it. Let’s do it. Positioning · 18 words Protecting our elections from fraud and international interference is a lot more important to me than vacation time. Positioning Claims · 24 words Our adversaries--like the Chinese Communist Party--will stop at nothing to distract, divide, disrupt, and destroy America. Their campaign is not confined to election day. Positioning · 8 words Election day is our last line of defense. Positioning Reasoning · 68 words Americans must always be free to reject the CCP and its values, while choosing a path that embraces the timeless truths that have always been at America’s core. The day that the CCP chooses the outcome of our elections will be the day that it won. And by then, it will be way too late to correct course and pass a commonsense bill like the SAVE America Act. Promise · 6 words We cannot wait for that day. The ask · 27 words I urge all of my colleagues to wake up. It is time to pass the SAVE America Act to save our elections, protect our country, save America. Positioning · 4 words It is fundamentally important. Positioning Off point Procedure · 4 words I yield the floor. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×92 Positioning ×12 Thanks ×8 Procedure ×5 Vague promise ×4 Unearned certainty ×2 Aside ×2
Off topic None of this speech addressed the bill under debate and what it would change.
Reasons given This statement drew 9 conclusions and gave a reason for each one.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 68
27 of 125 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “before I begin my remarks today, I must say that with a heavy heart I am grieving today for town marshal Brad Fisher, a 25-year law enforcement veteran who was tragically killed today in the line of duty in Indiana.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “Marshal Fisher was assisting other officers in stopping a fleeing suspect when the suspect hit Marshal Fisher and ultimately killed him.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I am praying for Marshal Fisher, for his family, everyone in the town of Lynn, IN,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “and Randolph County.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “What a devastating loss, a tragic loss.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “May he rest in peace.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “And may we always remember the sacrifice that all of our men and women of law enforcement make when they keep us safe.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I just want to take a minute and remember him.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Just take a look at Neville Roy Singham.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Take a look at some of the radical organizations on this chart that he supports through the billions of dollars that he made selling his tech company to a Chinese Communist Party business.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Singham groups advance a wide variety of causes that are united only by their hatred of America, our allies,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and the rule of law.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and hatred.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “All of this advances CCP interests and poisons our society.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It has been a long time coming.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “and thank God he did that.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “As one newly declassified intelligence assessment found:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and if that is not enough to sound the alarm--what you just heard from President Trump in his prime-time press conference and what I just shared with you--I don’t know what else is.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “All Americans--especially my colleagues in this body--should be outraged by this vulnerability.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We know that our adversaries like the CCP seek to do us harm and yet we stand by and often do nothing about it.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Our inaction has no excuse.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “And by the way, it is not only because of our international adversaries that we need to pass the SAVE America Act.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “That is a hell of an accident.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Protecting our elections from fraud and international interference is a lot more important to me than vacation time.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Election day is our last line of defense.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is fundamentally important.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield the floor.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 0
92 of 125 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “before I begin my remarks today, I must say that with a heavy heart I am grieving today for town marshal Brad Fisher, a 25-year law enforcement veteran who was tragically killed today in the line of duty in Indiana.” A tribute to a fallen town marshal, unrelated to the Maxwell clemency bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Marshal Fisher was assisting other officers in stopping a fleeing suspect when the suspect hit Marshal Fisher and ultimately killed him.” Describes the circumstances of Marshal Fisher’s death, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am praying for Marshal Fisher, for his family, everyone in the town of Lynn, IN,” Prayers for Marshal Fisher and his community, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and Randolph County.” Continues the tribute to Randolph County, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What a devastating loss, a tragic loss.” Laments the marshal’s death, not the subject of debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “May he rest in peace.” Part of the tribute to Marshal Fisher, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And may we always remember the sacrifice that all of our men and women of law enforcement make when they keep us safe.” A general salute to law enforcement, unrelated to the Maxwell clemency measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I just want to take a minute and remember him.” Concludes the tribute to the marshal, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “President Trump recently confirmed what many of us already knew:” Pivots to Chinese election interference, a different subject from the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “that foreign adversaries like China are working daily to interfere in our elections and our democratic society.” About foreign adversaries interfering in elections, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “China especially seeks America’s decline in hopes that they can establish a world order that runs through the Chinese Communist Party,” Discusses China’s world-order ambitions, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and we must do everything possible that we can to stop them from doing that.” A call to stop China, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Historically, when countries have held that kind of ambition, they have started big, catastrophic wars.” Historical claims about wars, not the subject of debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It should come as no surprise that the People’s Liberation Army is undertaking the largest peacetime military buildup in human history.” About China’s military buildup, not the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is why it is incumbent upon this body to fully fund our military--including President Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense budget request that he has made of this body--so that we can deter exactly that kind of conflict.” Argues for defense funding, a different topic from the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is outrageous that our colleagues on the other side of the aisle-- the Democrats--are holding up this bipartisan NDAA and budget request to fund our military when our military desperately needs our support.” Political attack about Democrats holding up the NDAA, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Yet, even if we successfully deter a hot conflict, we could still lose in other ways.” About losing to China in other ways, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is because every day the CCP is waging economic and political warfare against us.” Claims CCP economic and political warfare, not the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The CCP is trying to nurture dependency, exploit our divisions, cause us to question the justness of our cause,” Continues the CCP warfare theme, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and erode our democracy.” About eroding democracy, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This political warfare campaign is not confined to the shadows.” About CCP political warfare being open, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In many cases, it operates out in the open.” Continues the China topic, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Just take a look at Neville Roy Singham.” Introduces Neville Roy Singham, a subject unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Singham is a 72-year-old American tech mogul who sold his company and immediately fled to China.” Biography of Singham, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “From his Shanghai office--which he shares with a CCP propaganda outlet--whose avowed mission, by the way, is ``to tell China’s story well’’--Singham began funding a complex network of leftwing NGOs and nonprofits that advance the interests of the Chinese Communist Party.” About Singham funding NGOs from Shanghai, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Take a look at some of the radical organizations on this chart that he supports through the billions of dollars that he made selling his tech company to a Chinese Communist Party business.” About Singham-funded organizations, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is all a matter of public record.” Public record claim about Singham, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Even the New York Times has marveled at the hundreds of millions of dollars that Singham-linked groups have funneled to radical nonprofits that ``mix progressive advocacy with Chinese Government talking points.’’” Cites the New York Times on Singham groups, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Take one example that you and I know well--CODEPINK--you know, the radical organization that chases many of us around the hallways--around this building and our office buildings.” About CODEPINK, a subject unrelated to the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You see, CODEPINK used to condemn CCP human rights abuses.” About CODEPINK’s past positions, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But after Singham started lavishly funding the group--and then, by the way, he married its cofounder--CODEPINK stopped criticizing the Chinese Government and started defending it.” About Singham funding changing CODEPINK, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In fact, in recent years, CODEPINK has even provided cover for the CCP’s shocking genocide in Xinjiang.” About CODEPINK and Xinjiang, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Meanwhile, a newer Singham nonprofit called No Cold War is entirely dedicated to advocacy designed to ensure America is defenseless against the CCP’s economic, military,” About the No Cold War nonprofit, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and political warfare.” Continues the No Cold War discussion, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But the Singham network is not limited to China-specific advocacy.” About the Singham network’s breadth, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Singham groups advance a wide variety of causes that are united only by their hatred of America, our allies,” Characterizes Singham groups, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and the rule of law.” Continues characterizing Singham groups, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “From anti-ICE boycotts, violence against law enforcement, rioting, obstruction,” Lists causes of Singham groups, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and support for Hamas’ attempted genocide of Jews in Israel, Singham groups and their members advance division, chaos,” Continues the Singham discussion, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and hatred.” About division and hatred from Singham groups, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “All of this advances CCP interests and poisons our society.” Claims Singham activity advances CCP interests, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Thankfully, under President Trump’s leadership, the Department of Justice is now investigating this and whether Singham has been fueling this lawlessness in violation of U.S. law.” About a DOJ investigation of Singham, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It has been a long time coming.” Comment on the Singham investigation, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “At the same time, the State Department under Secretary Rubio is leading from the front in identifying leftwing violence and building an international coalition to confront it.” About the State Department and leftwing violence, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It should come as no surprise that,” Transitions within the China topic, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as the CCP seeks to interfere in our society, it also seeks to interfere in our elections.” About CCP election interference, unrelated to the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As President Trump disclosed before the American people in a prime-time address earlier this month, China perpetrated the largest known compromise of United States voter information in history:” About a voter-data compromise attributed to China, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “stealing the personal data of over 220 million Americans in the 2020 election.” Details of the alleged data theft, unrelated to the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The President also exposed ongoing vulnerabilities when it comes to America’s elections,” About election vulnerabilities, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and thank God he did that.” Thanks the President on election disclosures, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As one newly declassified intelligence assessment found:” Introduces an intelligence assessment on elections, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Our adversaries are actively coming for our elections,” About adversaries coming for elections, unrelated to the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and if that is not enough to sound the alarm--what you just heard from President Trump in his prime-time press conference and what I just shared with you--I don’t know what else is.” Rhetoric on election alarms, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “All Americans--especially my colleagues in this body--should be outraged by this vulnerability.” Calls for outrage over election vulnerability, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We know that our adversaries like the CCP seek to do us harm and yet we stand by and often do nothing about it.” Criticizes inaction on the CCP, unrelated to the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Our inaction has no excuse.” About inaction on election threats, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We need to safeguard our democracy,” Call to safeguard democracy, unrelated to the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and we need to do it right now.” Urgency about election security, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If this Chamber does anything at all this year, it must ensure that American elections are for Americans only--now and always.” Advocates ensuring elections are for Americans, a different measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is precisely why we have got to pass the SAVE America Act,” Urges passage of the SAVE America Act, not the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and we have to pass it now, ASAP.” Urgency for the SAVE America Act, not the measure under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In the face of the CCP’s coordinated campaign, we need more election integrity--not less.” About election integrity versus the CCP, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We need to ensure that all votes in American elections come from Americans--not illegal aliens or foreign manipulation.” About votes from Americans only, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And by the way, it is not only because of our international adversaries that we need to pass the SAVE America Act.” Introduces more reasons to pass the SAVE America Act, a different bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Just last week, a huge story hardly got any notice in the mainstream media.” About a New Jersey voter-rolls story, unrelated to the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But the new Democrat Governor of New Jersey--a former colleague of mine in the House--she announced that 6,600 noncitizens were ``accidentally added to the New Jersey voter rolls.’’” Details noncitizens added to voter rolls, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is a hell of an accident.” Commentary on the New Jersey story, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But not only that, she also told us that nearly 400 of those voters, who were accidentally placed on their voter rolls, actually voted in the last two elections in New Jersey.” About noncitizens voting in New Jersey, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Some of my colleagues keep saying that stories like this are a figment of our imagination.” About colleagues dismissing such stories, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It doesn’t really happen.” Continues the voter-fraud discussion, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Illegals don’t vote in American elections.” Repeats the illegal-voting claim, unrelated to the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Democratic Governor of New Jersey just told us it did happen.” Cites the New Jersey governor on voting, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They keep saying that these stories are just, I suppose, ``accidents’’ or ``software glitches’’ is what the Governor called it.” About explanations for voter-roll errors, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The fact of the matter is that these stories keep happening,” Claims such stories keep happening, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and we need to do everything that we can to put an end to it.” Call to end noncitizen voting, unrelated to the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It destroys trust in our elections when Americans read about stories like that.” About trust in elections, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If we have to cancel the August recess to pass the SAVE America Act,” Advocates canceling recess to pass the SAVE America Act, a different bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so be it.” Continues the SAVE America Act advocacy, not the measure under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let’s do it.” Exhortation to pass the other bill, unrelated to the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Protecting our elections from fraud and international interference is a lot more important to me than vacation time.” Prioritizes election protection over recess, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Our adversaries--like the Chinese Communist Party--will stop at nothing to distract, divide, disrupt,” About CCP efforts to destroy America, unrelated to the Maxwell bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and destroy America.” Continues the CCP threat discussion, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Their campaign is not confined to election day.” About the campaign beyond election day, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Election day is our last line of defense.” Calls election day a last line of defense, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Americans must always be free to reject the CCP and its values,” About Americans rejecting CCP values, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “while choosing a path that embraces the timeless truths that have always been at America’s core.” About America’s core truths, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The day that the CCP chooses the outcome of our elections will be the day that it won.” Hypothetical about the CCP choosing election outcomes, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And by then, it will be way too late to correct course and pass a commonsense bill like the SAVE America Act.” Urges the SAVE America Act, not the Maxwell measure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We cannot wait for that day.” Warning about waiting, tied to the other bill, not this one.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I urge all of my colleagues to wake up.” Urges colleagues to wake up on elections, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is time to pass the SAVE America Act to save our elections, protect our country, save America.” Explicit call to pass the SAVE America Act, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is fundamentally important.” Asserts importance of the other bill, unrelated to the Maxwell measure.
Reasoning · 100
0 of 125 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Nothing lost points.
Conclusions found · 9
Conclusion “and we must do everything possible that we can to stop them from doing that.”
Because “President Trump recently confirmed what many of us already knew:”
“that foreign adversaries like China are working daily to interfere in our elections and our democratic society.”
“China especially seeks America’s decline in hopes that they can establish a world order that runs through the Chinese Communist Party,”
Conclusion “That is why it is incumbent upon this body to fully fund our military--including President Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense budget request that he has made of this body--so that we can deter exactly that kind of conflict.”
Because “Historically, when countries have held that kind of ambition, they have started big, catastrophic wars.”
“It should come as no surprise that the People’s Liberation Army is undertaking the largest peacetime military buildup in human history.”
Conclusion “It is outrageous that our colleagues on the other side of the aisle-- the Democrats--are holding up this bipartisan NDAA and budget request to fund our military when our military desperately needs our support.”
Because “That is why it is incumbent upon this body to fully fund our military--including President Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense budget request that he has made of this body--so that we can deter exactly that kind of conflict.”
Conclusion “We need to safeguard our democracy,”
Because “That is because every day the CCP is waging economic and political warfare against us.”
“The CCP is trying to nurture dependency, exploit our divisions, cause us to question the justness of our cause,”
“and erode our democracy.”
“as the CCP seeks to interfere in our society, it also seeks to interfere in our elections.”
“As President Trump disclosed before the American people in a prime-time address earlier this month, China perpetrated the largest known compromise of United States voter information in history:”
“stealing the personal data of over 220 million Americans in the 2020 election.”
“Our adversaries are actively coming for our elections,”
Conclusion “If this Chamber does anything at all this year, it must ensure that American elections are for Americans only--now and always.”
Because “as the CCP seeks to interfere in our society, it also seeks to interfere in our elections.”
“As President Trump disclosed before the American people in a prime-time address earlier this month, China perpetrated the largest known compromise of United States voter information in history:”
“stealing the personal data of over 220 million Americans in the 2020 election.”
“Our adversaries are actively coming for our elections,”
“We need to ensure that all votes in American elections come from Americans--not illegal aliens or foreign manipulation.”
Conclusion “That is precisely why we have got to pass the SAVE America Act,”
Because “If this Chamber does anything at all this year, it must ensure that American elections are for Americans only--now and always.”
“We need to ensure that all votes in American elections come from Americans--not illegal aliens or foreign manipulation.”
“And by the way, it is not only because of our international adversaries that we need to pass the SAVE America Act.”
“But the new Democrat Governor of New Jersey--a former colleague of mine in the House--she announced that 6,600 noncitizens were ``accidentally added to the New Jersey voter rolls.’’”
Conclusion “and we need to do everything that we can to put an end to it.”
Because “But the new Democrat Governor of New Jersey--a former colleague of mine in the House--she announced that 6,600 noncitizens were ``accidentally added to the New Jersey voter rolls.’’”
“But not only that, she also told us that nearly 400 of those voters, who were accidentally placed on their voter rolls, actually voted in the last two elections in New Jersey.”
Conclusion “If we have to cancel the August recess to pass the SAVE America Act,”
Because “It destroys trust in our elections when Americans read about stories like that.”
“Protecting our elections from fraud and international interference is a lot more important to me than vacation time.”
Conclusion “It is time to pass the SAVE America Act to save our elections, protect our country, save America.”
Because “If this Chamber does anything at all this year, it must ensure that American elections are for Americans only--now and always.”
“That is precisely why we have got to pass the SAVE America Act,”
“In the face of the CCP’s coordinated campaign, we need more election integrity--not less.”
“We need to ensure that all votes in American elections come from Americans--not illegal aliens or foreign manipulation.”
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 92
6 of 125 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “what many of us already knew” Asserts that a claim was already known without citing any source for it.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we must do everything possible that we can to stop them” A commitment with no specific action, measure, or success condition.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We need to safeguard our democracy” States a goal with no actor, action, or measure attached.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we need more election integrity--not less” Calls for improvement with no defined action or success condition.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “The fact of the matter is” A formula asserting certainty in place of a source.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we need to do everything that we can to put an end to it” A commitment with no specific actor, action, or measure.
Claims · 13
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “town marshal Brad Fisher, a 25-year law enforcement veteran who was tragically killed today in the line of duty in Indiana” Brad Fisher, a town marshal in Indiana with 25 years in law enforcement, was killed in the line of duty on July 29, 2026. search
2 “assisting other officers in stopping a fleeing suspect when the suspect hit Marshal Fisher and ultimately killed him” Marshal Brad Fisher was struck and killed by a fleeing suspect while assisting other officers. search
3 “President Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense budget request” President Trump submitted a defense budget request of $1.5 trillion to Congress. search
4 “Singham is a 72-year-old American tech mogul who sold his company and immediately fled to China” Neville Roy Singham is a 72-year-old American tech entrepreneur who sold his company and moved to China. search
5 “he shares with a CCP propaganda outlet--whose avowed mission, by the way, is ``to tell China’s story well’’” Singham’s Shanghai office is shared with a CCP propaganda outlet whose stated mission is “to tell China’s story well”. search
6 “the New York Times has marveled at the hundreds of millions of dollars that Singham-linked groups have funneled to radical nonprofits that ``mix progressive advocacy with Chinese Government talking points.’’” The New York Times reported that groups linked to Singham have funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to nonprofits that mix progressive advocacy with Chinese government talking points. search
7 “he married its cofounder” Neville Roy Singham married a cofounder of CODEPINK. search
8 “the Department of Justice is now investigating this and whether Singham has been fueling this lawlessness in violation of U.S. law” The Department of Justice is investigating whether Neville Roy Singham has violated U.S. law. search
9 “President Trump disclosed before the American people in a prime-time address earlier this month” President Trump gave a prime-time address earlier in July 2026 in which he discussed Chinese interference. search
10 “stealing the personal data of over 220 million Americans in the 2020 election” China stole the personal data of over 220 million Americans in connection with the 2020 election, in what the speaker calls the largest known compromise of U.S. voter information. search
11 “newly declassified intelligence assessment” A newly declassified U.S. intelligence assessment says adversaries are actively targeting American elections. search
12 “But the new Democrat Governor of New Jersey--a former colleague of mine in the House--she announced that 6,600 noncitizens were ``accidentally added to the New Jersey voter rolls.’’” New Jersey’s new Democratic governor announced that 6,600 noncitizens were accidentally added to the state’s voter rolls. search
13 “nearly 400 of those voters, who were accidentally placed on their voter rolls, actually voted in the last two elections in New Jersey” Nearly 400 of the noncitizens accidentally added to New Jersey’s voter rolls voted in the last two New Jersey elections, per the governor’s announcement. search