Claims 75% Reasoning 9% Positioning 10% Promise 4% The ask 1% Procedure 1%
Structure · 12 steps
Claims · 9
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. President, Claims · 370 words Americans are aware that many of the products we buy and sell in this country are manufactured in China, but fewer may know that most of the Chinese goods come across the ocean and into our ports on Chinese ships--whether they are flying the Chinese flag, whether they are owned or operated by Chinese companies, or are even built in Chinese shipyards. But what may come as a shock is that those same ships could also carry deadly weapons. Off point That is right. Hidden among the shipping containers carrying appliances, clothing, and household goods, might well be missile launchers and drone launching systems. Arriving undetected, they could target our cities, destroy our infrastructure, and kill our citizens. This is a possibility American leaders must prepare for now. Naval analysts confirm that China is retrofitting cargo ships with deadly weapons: 1 long-range strike and surface-to-air missiles, drone launching systems, and radar and tracking systems. A large percentage of these vessels coming in and out of our ports are owned and operated by firms with direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party. What if one of these ships arrived in one of America’s largest ports? Now, the best case scenario is our intelligence community would detect the weapons, enabling the Coast Guard to intercept and seize the Chinese ship. Off point That is the best case scenario. But there is a far more alarming possibility: An armed Chinese cargo carrier slips in, undetected, and it launches devastating attacks on the port, destroying vital infrastructure and killing hundreds, and possibly many, many more. The Port of Houston is, for example, one of the largest by tonnage in our country.2 It is home to the world’s largest petrochemical complex and a quarter of America’s oil refining capacity.3 The explosions caused by a Chinese attack on the port would send clouds of carcinogens into the air and over nearby communities. Meanwhile, America’s energy supply would be devastated, causing painful shortages and draining the economy of millions of dollars a day. A similar disaster could play out at any of our other major ports-- Los Angeles, for example, our hub for transpacific trade; or Hampton Roads, VA, the east coast’s deepest harbor and home to the world’s largest naval base.4 Reasoning · 23 words Now, neither of these situations is inevitable if we cut our reliance on Chinese vessels and we decide to make American ships again. Claims · 58 words You see, the United States was once home to the world’s largest commercial fleet, numbering 4,000 ships.5 Today, we manufacture only a handful of commercial vessels each year. China can build over a thousand. In total, the United States has fewer than 100 ocean-going commercial vessels; 6 while China, they have nearly 6,000, the largest fleet in the world.7 Reasoning · 44 words Letting our maritime industrial base continue to rust is a great risk. It doesn’t just give China control over global supply chains and levers to constrain America’s policy options; it presents the Chinese Communist Party opportunities every day to sneak weapons into our cities. Positioning · 53 words We have a choice. We can do nothing and invite a potential economic and national security disaster, or we can rebuild our fleet. We can end our dependence on Chinese ships, and we can open up a new era of American ship building. I choose the latter. I choose restoring American maritime dominance. Positioning Claims · 89 words The SHIPS for America Act is the best way to accomplish this. The bill will encourage the construction of new ships and shipyards through tax incentives. It will deliver deregulation and permitting reform to reduce costs and speed the delivery of new vessels. It also will modernize training programs at our maritime academies and recruit a new generation of mariners. And the SHIPS Act will establish a maritime security trust fund to finance these programs, plus an expansion of the U.S.-flagged international fleet to 250 ships by the mid-2030s.8 Positioning · 18 words Now, we have a strong champion in President Trump, whose Maritime Action Plan is consistent with this bill. Positioning Claims · 38 words China is retrofitting its commercial ships into covert warships.9 The evidence is clear. Unearned certainty So too is the risk of allowing these vessels to dominate global trade and fill our ports because we have no ships of our own. Promise · 27 words But we have a plan to protect our ports and people, to build and launch a new fleet manned by American mariners, flying the Stars and Stripes. The ask · 9 words And Congress should pass the SHIPS Act without delay. Off point Procedure · 11 words I yield the floor. I suggest the absence of a quorum. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×52 Positioning ×8 Procedure ×2 Unearned certainty
Off topic Only 1% of this speech directly addressed the bill under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 87
10 of 63 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We have a choice.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We can do nothing and invite a potential economic and national security disaster,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “or we can rebuild our fleet.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We can end our dependence on Chinese ships,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and we can open up a new era of American ship building.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I choose the latter.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I choose restoring American maritime dominance.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Now, we have a strong champion in President Trump, whose Maritime Action Plan is consistent with this bill.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield the floor.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I suggest the absence of a quorum.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 1
52 of 63 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Americans are aware that many of the products we buy and sell in this country are manufactured in China,” Turns to Chinese-manufactured goods, a subject unrelated to the Maxwell clemency resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but fewer may know that most of the Chinese goods come across the ocean and into our ports on Chinese ships--whether they are flying the Chinese flag, whether they are owned or operated by Chinese companies,” Discusses Chinese shipping of consumer goods rather than the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “or are even built in Chinese shipyards.” Continues the Chinese shipyards topic, not the Maxwell resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But what may come as a shock is that those same ships could also carry deadly weapons.” Raises cargo ships carrying weapons, a subject outside the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Hidden among the shipping containers carrying appliances, clothing,” Describes shipping containers, unrelated to the resolution before the Senate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and household goods, might well be missile launchers and drone launching systems.” Discusses missile launchers on cargo ships, not the Maxwell clemency question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Arriving undetected, they could target our cities, destroy our infrastructure,” Describes hypothetical attacks on cities, unrelated to the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and kill our citizens.” Continues the hypothetical attack scenario rather than the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is a possibility American leaders must prepare for now.” Calls for preparation against shipborne weapons, a different subject from the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Naval analysts confirm that China is retrofitting cargo ships with deadly weapons:” Cites naval analysts on Chinese ship retrofits, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “long-range strike and surface-to-air missiles, drone launching systems,” Details Chinese missile systems, not the Maxwell clemency question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and radar and tracking systems.” Describes radar systems on Chinese vessels, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A large percentage of these vessels coming in and out of our ports are owned and operated by firms with direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party.” Discusses Chinese Communist Party ties to shipping firms, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What if one of these ships arrived in one of America’s largest ports?” Poses a hypothetical about an armed ship at a US port, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now, the best case scenario is our intelligence community would detect the weapons, enabling the Coast Guard to intercept and seize the Chinese ship.” Describes intelligence and Coast Guard interception scenarios, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But there is a far more alarming possibility:” Introduces an attack scenario rather than addressing the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “An armed Chinese cargo carrier slips in, undetected,” Continues the hypothetical undetected Chinese carrier, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and it launches devastating attacks on the port, destroying vital infrastructure and killing hundreds,” Describes port attacks and casualties, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and possibly many, many more.” Continues the casualty scenario rather than the Maxwell question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Port of Houston is, for example, one of the largest by tonnage in our country.” Describes the Port of Houston, a subject unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is home to the world’s largest petrochemical complex and a quarter of America’s oil refining capacity.” Details Houston’s petrochemical capacity, not the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The explosions caused by a Chinese attack on the port would send clouds of carcinogens into the air and over nearby communities.” Discusses carcinogen clouds from a hypothetical attack, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Meanwhile, America’s energy supply would be devastated, causing painful shortages and draining the economy of millions of dollars a day.” Describes energy supply damage from an attack, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A similar disaster could play out at any of our other major ports-- Los Angeles, for example, our hub for transpacific trade;” Discusses other US ports as potential targets, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “or Hampton Roads, VA, the east coast’s deepest harbor and home to the world’s largest naval base.” Describes Hampton Roads and its naval base, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now, neither of these situations is inevitable if we cut our reliance on Chinese vessels and we decide to make American ships again.” Advocates reducing reliance on Chinese vessels, a different subject from the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “You see, the United States was once home to the world’s largest commercial fleet, numbering 4,000 ships.” Recounts the historical US commercial fleet, not the Maxwell question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Today, we manufacture only a handful of commercial vessels each year.” Cites current US shipbuilding rates, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “China can build over a thousand.” Cites Chinese shipbuilding output, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In total, the United States has fewer than 100 ocean-going commercial vessels;” Gives figures on US commercial vessels, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “while China, they have nearly 6,000, the largest fleet in the world.” Compares Chinese and US fleet sizes, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Letting our maritime industrial base continue to rust is a great risk.” Warns about the maritime industrial base, a different subject from the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It doesn’t just give China control over global supply chains and levers to constrain America’s policy options;” Discusses supply chain control by China, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “it presents the Chinese Communist Party opportunities every day to sneak weapons into our cities.” Returns to weapons smuggling on Chinese ships, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have a choice.” Frames a policy choice about shipbuilding, not the Maxwell resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We can do nothing and invite a potential economic and national security disaster,” Warns of economic and security disaster tied to shipping, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “or we can rebuild our fleet.” Advocates rebuilding the fleet rather than addressing the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We can end our dependence on Chinese ships,” Calls for ending dependence on Chinese ships, a different subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and we can open up a new era of American ship building.” Advocates American shipbuilding, unrelated to the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I choose the latter.” States the speaker’s preference on shipbuilding, not the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I choose restoring American maritime dominance.” Endorses maritime dominance, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The SHIPS for America Act is the best way to accomplish this.” Promotes the SHIPS for America Act, a different measure from the resolution under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The bill will encourage the construction of new ships and shipyards through tax incentives.” Describes tax incentives in the SHIPS Act, not the Maxwell clemency bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It will deliver deregulation and permitting reform to reduce costs and speed the delivery of new vessels.” Details permitting reform from the SHIPS Act, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It also will modernize training programs at our maritime academies and recruit a new generation of mariners.” Describes maritime training programs, a subject outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And the SHIPS Act will establish a maritime security trust fund to finance these programs, plus an expansion of the U.S.-flagged international fleet to 250 ships by the mid-2030s.” Details the SHIPS Act’s trust fund and fleet targets, not the resolution under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now, we have a strong champion in President Trump, whose Maritime Action Plan is consistent with this bill.” Discusses President Trump’s Maritime Action Plan, unrelated to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “China is retrofitting its commercial ships into covert warships.” Restates the Chinese warship retrofit claim, off the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The evidence is clear.” Asserts evidence about Chinese ships, unrelated to the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “So too is the risk of allowing these vessels to dominate global trade and fill our ports because we have no ships of our own.” Warns of risks from Chinese vessels dominating trade, not the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “But we have a plan to protect our ports and people, to build and launch a new fleet manned by American mariners, flying the Stars and Stripes.” Presents a shipbuilding plan as protection, a different subject from the resolution.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “And Congress should pass the SHIPS Act without delay.” Calls for passage of the SHIPS Act rather than the Maxwell clemency resolution.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 99
1 of 63 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “The evidence is clear” Asserts certainty without naming any evidence or source, where the earlier claim in c12 was attributed to naval analysts.
Claims · 9
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Naval analysts confirm that China is retrofitting cargo ships with deadly weapons” Naval analysts have confirmed that China is retrofitting cargo ships with weapons including long-range strike and surface-to-air missiles and drone launching systems. search
2 “The Port of Houston is, for example, one of the largest by tonnage in our country” The Port of Houston is one of the largest ports in the United States by tonnage. search
3 “It is home to the world’s largest petrochemical complex and a quarter of America’s oil refining capacity” The Port of Houston area hosts the world’s largest petrochemical complex and a quarter of America’s oil refining capacity. search
4 “Hampton Roads, VA, the east coast’s deepest harbor and home to the world’s largest naval base” Hampton Roads, Virginia has the east coast’s deepest harbor and is home to the world’s largest naval base. search
5 “the United States was once home to the world’s largest commercial fleet, numbering 4,000 ships” The United States once had the world’s largest commercial fleet, numbering 4,000 ships. search
6 “the United States has fewer than 100 ocean-going commercial vessels” The United States currently has fewer than 100 ocean-going commercial vessels. search
7 “China, they have nearly 6,000, the largest fleet in the world” China has nearly 6,000 commercial vessels, the largest fleet in the world. search
8 “establish a maritime security trust fund to finance these programs, plus an expansion of the U.S.-flagged international fleet to 250 ships by the mid-2030s” The SHIPS for America Act would establish a maritime security trust fund and expand the U.S.-flagged international fleet to 250 ships by the mid-2030s. search
9 “China is retrofitting its commercial ships into covert warships” China is retrofitting its commercial ships into covert warships. search